Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00299494
Registration number
NCT00299494
Ethics application status
Date submitted
2/03/2006
Date registered
6/03/2006
Date last updated
8/03/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study Evaluating Inotuzumab Ozogamicin [CMC-544] Administered In Combination With Rituximab In Subjects With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase 1/2 Study Of Cmc-544 Administered In Combination With Rituximab In Subjects With Follicular Or Diffuse Large B-cell Non-hodgkin's Lymphoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
B1931004
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
3129K3-101
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
B-Cell Lymphoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - inotuzumab ozogamicin
Treatment: Drugs - inotuzumab ozogamicin
Treatment: Drugs - inotuzumab ozogamicin
Treatment: Drugs - Rituximab
Experimental: INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (FOLLICULAR) - Follicular
Experimental: INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (DLBCL) - Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Experimental: INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (REFRACTORY) - Refractory Aggressive NHL
Treatment: Drugs: inotuzumab ozogamicin
IV, 1.8 mg/m2, q4w
Treatment: Drugs: inotuzumab ozogamicin
IV, 1.8 mg/m2, q4w
Treatment: Drugs: inotuzumab ozogamicin
IV, 1.8 mg/m2, q4w
Treatment: Drugs: Rituximab
rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 via IV infusion on Day 1
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With Rituximab (375 mg/m^2 )
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Inotuzumab ozogamicin was dose escalated (3 to 6 evaluable participants enrolled per dose cohort) during the first 28 days after the first administration of inotuzumab ozogamicin + rituximab. Enrollment at the next dose level or enrollment of additional subjects into a cohort proceeded according to the following criteria: 0 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) by Day 28 of first dose move to higher dose, 1 participant reporting DLT but no others in cohort by Day 28 of first dose move to higher dose, greater than 2 participants reporting DLT by Day 28 of first dose stop and prior dose level considered MTD. The worldwide medical monitor and investigators reviewed all significant study drug-related toxicities to determine if the dose escalation rules were satisfied and whether the dose escalation schedule required modification.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
First 28-day cycle
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Safety Population)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
A TEAE is any event that occurred after the first dose of study drug up to 56 days post the last dose of study drug (either rituximab or inotuzumab ozogamicin).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Protocol reporting period of from informed consent to at least 28 days after the last dose. This outcome measure time frame: From the first dose of study drug to up to 56 days after the last dose of either study drug.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Unconfirmed CR (CRu), or Partial Response (PR)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
CR: a. Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms, and normalization of NHL assignable biochemical abnormalities ; b. lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size; c. Spleen regressed in size and not palpable on physical exam, size of other organs enlarged due to disease decreased in size; d. Repeat bone marrow infiltrate clear. CRu: CR but allows for a. Residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter has regressed by more than 75% in diameter. Individual nodes that were previously confluent regressed more than 75 % in their product diameters; b. Indeterminate bone marrow. PR: a. =50 % decrease in product of the diameters (SPD) of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; b. No increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen, c. Liver or spleen nodules regressed =50% in the SPD; d. Other organs usually assessable, no measurable disease present.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Approximately every 2 (during treatment) or 3 (during follow-up) to 6 months for up to 5 years from 1st dose
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine PFS. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression. Relapsed or Progressive Disease (PD) requires the following: a. Appearance of any new lesions, b. Increase by \>= 50% in the size of previously involved sites, c. \>= 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node, d. \>= 50% increase from nadir in the product diameter of any previously identified abnormal node for PRs or nonresponders, e. Enlarging spleen or liver.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From the date of first dose of test article until the first date on which disease progression or death was documented or new anticancer start, any of which could be reported up to 5 years post last dose
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Progression Free at 6 Months
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Progression Free Survival is defined as the time interval from the first dose of test article until the first date on which relapsed disease, progression, initiation of new anti-cancer treatment due to persistent/refractory disease, or death was documented, censored at the last tumor evaluation.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From the first dose to 6 months after first dose
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From the first dose up to 5 years post last dose
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Survival at 6 Months
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine OS. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From the first dose to 6 months after first dose.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
TTP is defined as the interval from the first dose of the test article until the first date on which relapsed disease or progression, or death secondary to progression is documented, censored at the last disease assessment. Relapsed or Progressive Disease (PD) requires the following: a. Appearance of any new lesions, b. Increase by \>= 50% in the size of previously involved sites, c. \>= 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node, d. \>= 50% increase from nadir in the product diameter of any previously identified abnormal node for PRs or nonresponders, e. Enlarging spleen or liver. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine TTP. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From the date of first dose of test article until the first date on which disease progression or death was documented, any of which could be reported up to 5 years post last dose.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Event Free at 6 Months
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Time-to-Tumor Progression (TTP): is defined as the interval from the first dose of the test article until the first date on which relapsed disease or progression, or death secondary to progression is documented, censored at the last disease assessment. Relapsed or Progressive Disease (PD) requires the following: a. Appearance of any new lesions, b. Increase by \>=50% in the size of previously involved sites, c. \>= 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node, d. \>= 50% increase from nadir in the product diameter of any previously identified abnormal node for PRs or nonresponders, e. Enlarging spleen or liver. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determineTTP. 95% 2-sided confidence interval were calculated using stratified Cox proportional hazard regression.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From enrollment to up to 6 months from 1st dose.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Duration of Response (CR+CRu+PR)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Time from date measurement criteria met for CR, CRu, or PR (whichever occurred first) until first date relapsed disease/date of death. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical, radiographic evidence of disease, disease-related symptoms, normalization of NHL assignable biochemical abnormalities; lymph nodes, nodal masses regressed to normal size; spleen size regressed, not palpable on physical exam, size of other organs enlarged due to disease. CRu: CR but allows for: residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that regressed \>75% in product diameter. Individual nodes previously confluent, regressed by \>75% in their product diameters; Indeterminate bone marrow. PR: =50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes/nodal masses; No increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; Splenic/hepatic nodules regressed by =50% in SPD; Except splenic/hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs assessable and no measurable disease present.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Time from date measurement criteria are met for CR, CRu, or PR (whichever status is recorded first) until the first date relapsed disease or date of death (whichever occurs first) is objectively documented.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Serum concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 30 and 58 were measured. AUCinf of inotuzumab ozogamicin was reported. AUCinf: AUClast (area under the serum concentration-time profile for inotuzumab ozogamicin from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration) +(Clast \[last quantifiable concentration\]/kel \[elimination rate constant\]) where Clast is the predicted serum concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin at the last quantifiable timepoint estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
AUClast of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Serum concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 1, 30 and 58 were measured. AUC of inotuzumab ozogamicin was reported. AUClast is area under the serum concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the Clast, using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Time of the Last Quantifiable Serum Concentration in a Dosing Interval (Tlast) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Tlast of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 1, 30, and 58 was reported. Tlast: Time of last quantifiable concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin. Observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Area Under the Steady-state Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUCtau) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Steady-state serum concentrations of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 1, 30 and 58 were measured. AUCtau of inotuzumab ozogamicin was reported. AUCtau=AUC over dosage interval tau calculated using Linear/log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Peak Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Serum concentration of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 1, 30, and 58 were measured. Cmax of inotuzumab ozogamicin was reported. Cmax was observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Tmax: Time at which Cmax occurs. Observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Average Serum Concentration at Steady State (Cav) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Cav: AUCtau (Area under the concentration time profile)/tau for Dosing Day 30 Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab+Rituximab on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Cmin: Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval tau. Observed directly from data from Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Clearance (CL) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab+Rituximab on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Clearance is defined as Dose/AUCinf. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Steady-state Volume of Distribution (Vss) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Serum in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab MTD+Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Vss of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Dosing Days 30 and 58 were reported. Vss=CL\*MRT (mean residence time). Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
MRT of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Serum in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
MRT: AUMCinf/AUCinf - DOF (degrees of freedom)/2, where AUMCinf is the area under the first moment curve derived using the linear/log trapezoidal method, and DOF is the duration of the IV infusion dose. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Serum Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Termnial half-life (t½): Loge(2)/kel, where kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.
Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
AUCinf of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated + Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
AUCinf: AUClast+(Clast/kel) where Clast is the predicted serum concentration at the last quantifiable timepoint estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
AUClast of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
AUClast: AUC over dosage interval through last measurable time point, Tlast, using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration in a Dosing Interval (Tlast) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Tlast: Time of last quantifiable concentration. Observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Area Under the Steady-state Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUCtau) for Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30, and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
AUCtau=AUC over dosage interval tau calculated using Linear/log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Peak Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Cmax: Observed directly from data Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Time of Observed Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated+Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
Tmax: Time at which Cmax occurs. Observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.
Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Average Serum Concentration (Cav) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Cav: AUCtau/tau for Dosing Day 30 Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Cmin: Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval tau. Observed directly from data from Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Clearance (CL) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
Clearance defined as Dose/AUCinf. Corresponds to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Steady-state Volume (Vss) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) Distribution in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
Vss: Steady-state volume of distribution CL\*MRT of inotuzumab ozogamicin Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
MRT: AUMCinf/AUCinf - DOF/2, where AUMCinf is the area under the first moment curve derived using the linear/log trapezoidal method, and DOF is the duration of the IV infusion dose. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Serum Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Total Calicheamicin (Conjugated Plus Unconjugated) in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Termnial half-life (t½): Loge(2)/kel, where kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.
Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [33]
0
0
Area Under the Steady-state Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUClast) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [33]
0
0
AUClast: AUC over dosage interval through last measurable time point, Tlast, using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [33]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [34]
0
0
Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration in a Dosing Interval (Tlast) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [34]
0
0
Tlast: Time of last quantifiable concentration. Observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [34]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [35]
0
0
Peak Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [35]
0
0
Cmax: Observed directly from data Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [35]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [36]
0
0
Time of Observed Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin + Rituximab on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [36]
0
0
Tmax: Time at which Cmax occurs. Observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [36]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [37]
0
0
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Unconjugated Calicheamicin in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin+Rituximab on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [37]
0
0
Cmin: Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval tau. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [37]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [38]
0
0
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [38]
0
0
AUCinf: AUClast+(Clast/kel) where Clast is the predicted serum concentration at the last quantifiable timepoint estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [38]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [39]
0
0
Area Under the Steady-state Concentration-time Curve (AUClast) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [39]
0
0
AUClast: AUC over dosage interval through last measurable time point, Tlast, using Linear/Log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [39]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [40]
0
0
Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration in a Dosing Interval (Tlast) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [40]
0
0
Tlast: Time of last quantifiable concentration. Observed directly from data. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [40]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [41]
0
0
Serum Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [41]
0
0
Termnial half-life (t½): Loge(2)/kel, where kel is the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.
Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [41]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [42]
0
0
Area Under the Steady-state Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUCtau) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD+ Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30, and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [42]
0
0
AUCtau=AUC over dosage interval tau calculated using Linear/log trapezoidal method. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [42]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [43]
0
0
Peak Concentration (Cmax) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [43]
0
0
Cmax: Observed directly from data Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [43]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [44]
0
0
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 1, Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [44]
0
0
Tmax: Time at which Cmax occurs. Observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. Study Days Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 1 for Cycle 1; Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [44]
0
0
Cycle 1, Days 1 (0 hour), 2 (0, 1, 4 hours), 4, 8, 10, 15, and 29; Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [45]
0
0
Average Serum Concentration (Cav) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [45]
0
0
Cav: AUCtau/tau for Dosing Day 30 Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [45]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [46]
0
0
Minimum Observed Serum Trough Concentration (Cmin) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [46]
0
0
Cmin: Lowest concentration observed during the dosing interval tau. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [46]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [47]
0
0
Clearance (CL) of Serum Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [47]
0
0
Clearance defined as Dose/AUCinf. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [47]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Secondary outcome [48]
0
0
Steady-state Volume (Vss) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Antibody Distribution in Participants Receiving Inotuzumab Ozogamicin MTD + Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 on Dosing Day 30 and Day 58
Query!
Assessment method [48]
0
0
Vss: Steady-state volume of distribution CL\*MRT of inotuzumab ozogamicin Day 30 for Cycle 2; and Day 58 for Cycle 3. Study Days Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57 and Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85 correspond to Dosing Day 30 for Cycle 2 and Dosing Day 58 for Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [48]
0
0
Cycle 2, Days 30 (0, 1, 4 hours), 32, 36, 38, 43, 50, and 57; Cycle 3, Days 58 (0, 1, 4 hours), 60, 64, 66, 71, 78, and 85
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subjects with CD20 and CD22-positive, follicular or diffuse large B-cell NHL who have not responded or progressed after 1 or 2 prior therapies; or subjects with CD20 and CD22-positive intermediate/aggressive NHL (diffuse large B-cell, mantle cell, transformed follicular or follicular grade 3b NHL) who have not responded or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies and are refractory to a previous rituximab containing therapy.
* Prior therapy must contain at least one course of rituximab therapy, as single agent or in combination.
* Measurable disease.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Subjects who are candidates for other potentially curative therapies.
* Subjects must not have received previous radioimmunotherapy.
* Subjects who have undergone a prior bone marrow transplantation within the last 6 months.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Factorial
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 1
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/05/2006
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
2/06/2014
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
119
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Brisbane, QL
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
4029 - Herston
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Vlaams-brabant
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Le Chesnay
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Pierre Benite
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Bonn
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Mainz
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Shatin N.T.
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Zuid-holland
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Zurich
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Devon
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Hampshire
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Pfizer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
UCB Pharma
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the tolerability, the initial safety profile and maximum tolerated dose, and to obtain preliminary information on the antitumor activity of inotuzumab ozogamicin \[CMC-544\] in combination with rituximab in subjects with follicular, diffuse large B-Cell, or mantle cell NHL.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00299494
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Fayad L, Offner F, Smith MR, Verhoef G, Johnson P, Kaufman JL, Rohatiner A, Advani A, Foran J, Hess G, Coiffier B, Czuczman M, Gine E, Durrant S, Kneissl M, Luu KT, Hua SY, Boni J, Vandendries E, Dang NH. Safety and clinical activity of a combination therapy comprising two antibody-based targeting agents for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a phase I/II study evaluating the immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin with rituximab. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):573-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.7211. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Query!
Address
0
0
Pfizer
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00299494
Download to PDF