Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Show all queries
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00310570
Registration number
NCT00310570
Ethics application status
Date submitted
2/04/2006
Date registered
4/04/2006
Date last updated
4/04/2006
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison of Splinting Interventions for Treating Mallet Finger Injuries
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of Splinting Interventions for Minimising Extensor Lag in Mallet Finger Injuries
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
Project 58/06
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Mallet Finger
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Degree of extensor lag at distal inter-phalangeal (DIP)joint
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Active range of motion at DIP
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Patient compliance with splinting regime, based on self-report (as described above)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Patient satisfaction with result on 5-point likert scale
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Complications
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Pain, measured by 10 point Visual Analogue Scale
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- All referrals of patients with mallet finger injuries will be considered for inclusion with the exception of the following exclusion criteria.
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* open injuries
* mallet injury to thumb
* co-existing rheumatologic illness
* time from injury to presentation greater than 2 weeks
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
UNKNOWN
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/05/2006
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
The Alfred Hospital - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3004 - Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Government body
Query!
Name
Bayside Health
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Stubbing of the finger-tip is a common injury in sports such as basketball, volleyball, cricket and football. This can result in a Mallet finger deformity, where the end joint of a finger cannot be actively straightened out. In most mallet finger cases seen at The Alfred, the skin remains intact, and the impairment results from a tear of the extensor tendon or an avulsion (a small fracture where the tendon attaches to the bone). Treatment commonly involves immobilising the end joint of the finger in a splint for six or more weeks so patient compliance is a major factor in the quality of the outcome achieved. This study aims to compare two different types of splintage (the commonly used thermoplastic thimble splint and the aluminium-foam "Mexican hat" splint which is in use in Britain) with a control splint (thermoplastic prefabricated "stack splint" with tape). Outcome measures will include patient compliance with the splint, degree of extensor lag, active movement of the joint, and any complications. The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in outcome between different methods of conservative splinting treatment for mallet finger.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00310570
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Wilson SW, Khoo CT. The Mexican hat splint--a new splint for the treatment of closed mallet finger. J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Oct;26(5):488-9. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0590. Handoll HH, Vaghela MV. Interventions for treating mallet finger injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD004574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004574.pub2. O'Brien LJ, Bailey MJ. Single blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing dorsal aluminum and custom thermoplastic splints to stack splint for acute mallet finger. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Feb;92(2):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.035.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Lisa O'Brien, M.Clin.Sci
Query!
Address
0
0
The Alfred
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Richard Bloom, MBBS, FRACS
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
+613 9276 2000
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Handoll HH, Vaghela MV. Interventions for treating...
[
More Details
]
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00310570
Download to PDF
Show all queries