Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Show all queries
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00351468
Registration number
NCT00351468
Ethics application status
Date submitted
10/07/2006
Date registered
12/07/2006
Date last updated
17/04/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study)
Query!
Scientific title
EXTEND (Eltrombopag Extended Dosing Study): An Extension Study of Eltrombopag Olamine (SB-497115-GR) in Adults, With Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Previously Enrolled in an Eltrombopag Study.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
TRA105325
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
EXTEND
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Purpura, Thrombocytopaenic, Idiopathic
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Autoimmune diseases
Query!
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other blood disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR)
Experimental: Eltrombopag - Open-label eltrombopag
Treatment: Drugs: eltrombopag olamine (SB-497115-GR)
Eltrombopag with starting dose of 50mg daily, max dose of 75mg daily and min dose of 25mg daily or less frequently. Modifications were given to maintain platelet count in range of 50 to 200 Gi/L.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Summary of On-Therapy Adverse Events (Safety Population)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
All safety evaluation findings considered to be adverse events are reported in the Adverse Event section.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Start date was the first dose of investigational product and up to the day after the last dose . Post-therapy: start date was more than 1 day after the last dose and up to 30 days after last dose of investigational product up to week 364
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Subjects Achieving Maximum Platelet Counts Greater Than or Equal to 30 Gi/L or 50 Gi/L in the Absence of Rescue Medication
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Subjects who achieved maximum platelet count at least once during treatment. All platelet counts after an on-study splenectomy are not classed as responses.
Platelet counts within 7 days after a platelet transfusion are not classed as responses.
Platelet counts while taking an increased ITP medication or within 6 weeks after the end of an increased ITP medication are not classed as responses.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline up to 2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Summary of Subjects Achieving Platelet Count Levels by Week, in the Absence of Rescue Medication
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
If a subject has more than 1 platelet count result within a week, the lowest value observed is used to determine response. All platelet counts after an on-study splenectomy are not classed as responses. Platelet counts within 7 days after a platelet transfusion are not classed as responses.
Platelet counts while taking an increased ITP medication or within 6 weeks after the end of an increased ITP medication are not classed as responses.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline up to Year 7/Week 364
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Subjects Who Responded to Eltrombopag in a Previous Study and Who Respond to Retreatment With a Rise in Platelet Count to Either = 50,000/µL or =30,000/µL
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Responder in TRA100773: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL) at last on-treatment assessment. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL), 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time. Responder in RAISE: Platelet count 50GI/L and 2 x baseline at Week 6 assessment. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline, 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time. Responder in REPEAT: Platelet count 50 GI/L and 2 x baseline (BL) at Week 6 assessment in Cycle 1. Responders in EXTEND: Platelet count 50 Gi/L and 2 x baseline (BL) 50 Gi/L, and 30 Gi/L at any time.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline up to 2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Reduction and/or Sparing of Concomitant ITP Therapies, While Maintaining a Platelet Count = 50,000/mL.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Sustain reduct: Sustained reduction 1 Denominator is number of subjects taking an ITP medication at baseline. 2 Denominator is number of subjects with a sustained reduction. Note: Sustained reduction defined as reduction from baseline in dose and/or frequency which is maintained for at least 4 weeks. Excludes sustained reductions started more than 1 day after last dose.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline up to 2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Subjects Who Required Rescue Therapy During Treatment With Eltrombopag.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Rescue treatment is defined as a composite of: new ITP medication, increased dose of a concomitant ITP medication, platelet transfusion, and splenectomy. Subjects may have received more than 1 type of rescue therapy
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline up to 2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Maximum ITP Bleeding Score at Any Time During the Study During All Stages.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The ITP bleeding score is a tool which has been designed specifically to assess the bruising and bleeding in patients with ITP across body sites, ranging from mild to severe. The WHO Grades were dichotomized into the following categories: - Grade 0, No bleeding -Grade 1 to 4, Any bleeding -Grade 0 to 1: No clinically significant bleeding -Grade 2 to 4 Clinically significant bleeding
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline up to 2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Best Post-Baseline Change in SF-36v2 Questionnaire Score From Any Time Point Compared With Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The SF-36v2 assessment tool was used to obtain information about subjects' general health status and health-related quality of life. Until a formal assessment of minimal clinically important differences (MCID) is performed, changes from baseline of more than 0.5 standard deviations are suggested as clinically meaningful. Scores were transformed to a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing more positive answers. Scores were normalized to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 to allow for comparison with outcomes from other chronic diseases. Recall period is the past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline, beginning of each stage, change in therapy and minimum frequency of every 3 months during stages, prior to early discontinuation, up to 2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Best Post-Baseline Change in the Short Form of the Motivation and Energy Scale (MEI-SF) From Any Time Point Compared With Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The MEI-SF (18 questions) was used to measure the reductions in mental energy, physical energy, and social motivation, either as symptoms of chronic ITP or as a side effect of pharmacotherapy. Minimal clinically important differences are estimated as 0.5 standard deviations or 7.5 points. All items use either a 7-level (0 to 6) or 5-level (0 to 4) response scale; items with a 5-level response scale were rescaled to 7-levels, and items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL Total score ranges from 0 to 108 points. Recall period is past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, beginning of each stage, change in therapy and minimum frequency of every 3 months during stages, prior to early discontinuation, up to 2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Best Post-Baseline Change in the FACIT-Fatigue 13 Item Subscale Score From Any Time Point Compared to Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
The FACIT-Fatigue consists of 13 questions in which patients rate the frequency (0-4) of symptoms of fatigue, in terms of tiredness, weakness, and fatigue Items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL Total score ranges from 0 to 52.Using anchor-based estimates, the minimally important difference in this subscale is 3.0 points.
Recall period is past week prior to administration. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, beginning of each stage, change in therapy and minimum frequency of every 3 months during stages, prior to early discontinuation, up to 2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Best Post-Baseline Change in the FACT-TH6 at Any Time Point Compared to Baseline
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The FACT-TH6 consists of 6 questions in which patients rate (0-4) their general degree of worry related to bleeding and bruising, and resulting activity impairment and frustration. Although the six items do not constitute a formal domain or subscale of the FACT-Th assessment tool, these items had been identified by focus groups of patients with chronic ITP as important indicators of their HRQoL. Items were reverse-scored as necessary such that higher scores represent higher HRQoL. Total scores ranged from 0 to 24. Recall period is not specified. The change in scores was measured at the transitioning period and immediately prior to withdrawal/completion over 2 years, and the mean of these measurements was recorded to calculate the change from baseline and the best post baseline change score was reported for the entire group
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, beginning of each stage, change in therapy and minimum frequency of every 3 months during stages, prior to early discontinuation, up to 2 years
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subject has signed and dated a written informed consent.
* Adults (=18 years) diagnosed with ITP according to the American Society for Hematology/British Committee for Standards in Haematology (ASH/BCSH) guidelines [George, 1996; BCSH, 2003]. In addition, a peripheral blood smear should support the diagnosis of ITP with no evidence of other disease causative of thrombocytopenia (e.g., pseudo thrombocytopenia, myelofibrosis). The physical examination should not suggest any disease which may cause thrombocytopenia other than ITP.
* Prior completion of treatment and follow up periods in an ITP study of eltrombopag (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT).
* Subjects previously enrolled in Study TRA100773 must have completed the prescribed follow-up ophthalmic assessment at 6 months.
* Subjects previously enrolled in TRA102537/RAISE or other studies that may lead into EXTEND (e.g., TRA108057/REPEAT) must have completed the treatment and follow-up periods as defined in that protocol.
* Subject experienced no eltrombopag-related toxicity or other drug intolerance on prior eltrombopag study (e.g., TRA100773 or TRA102537/RAISE or TRA108057/REPEAT) even if resolved; subjects discontinued from previous study due to toxicity will not be eligible unless they received placebo.
* Subject has no intercurrent medical event, including thrombosis.
* Subjects must have either initially responded (platelet count > 100,000/mL) to a previous ITP therapy or have had a bone marrow examination consistent with ITP within 3 years to rule out myelodysplastic syndromes or other causes of thrombocytopenia
* Previous therapy for ITP with immunoglobulins (IVIg and anti-D) must have been completed at least 1 week prior to first dose of study medication and the platelet count must show a clear downward trend after the last treatment with immunoglobulins. Previous treatment for ITP with splenectomy, rituximab and cyclophosphamide must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, or clearly be ineffective.
* Subjects treated with concomitant ITP medication (e.g. corticosteroids or azathioprine) must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects treated with cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil or danazol must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 3 months prior to the first dose of study medication.
* Prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) must be within 80 to 120% of the normal range with no history of hypercoagulable state.
* A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range (including WBC differential not indicative of a disorder other than ITP), with the following exceptions:
* Hemoglobin: Subjects with hemoglobin levels between 10.0 g/dL and the lower limit of normal are eligible for inclusion, if anemia is clearly attributable to ITP (excessive blood loss).
* ANC=1500/mL (1.5 x 10^9/L) is required for inclusion (elevated WBC/ANC due to steroid treatment is acceptable).
* The following clinical chemistries MUST NOT exceed the upper limit of normal (ULN) reference range by more than 20%: creatinine, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase. In addition, total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%.
* Subject is practicing an acceptable method of contraception (documented in chart). Female subjects (or female partners of male subjects) must either be of non-childbearing potential (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or post-menopausal > 1 year), or of childbearing potential and use one of the following highly effective methods of contraception (i.e., Pearl Index <1.0%) from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study:
* Complete abstinence from intercourse;
* Intrauterine device (IUD);
* Two forms of barrier contraception (diaphragm plus spermicide, and for males condom plus spermicide);
* Male partner is sterile prior to entry into the study and is the only partner of the female;
* Systemic contraceptives (combined or progesterone only).
* Subject is able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply:
* Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination, or any other medical condition or circumstance, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study or suggests another diagnosis.
* Concurrent malignant disease and/or history of cancer treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
* Any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), AND=two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, etc), or any other family history of arterial or venous thrombosis
* Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (including congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association [NYHA] Grade III/IV), or arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or subjects with a QTc >450 msec.
* Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine b-human chorionic gonadotrophin (b-hCG) pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
* History of alcohol/drug abuse.
* Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication.
* Subject treated with drugs that affect platelet function (including but not limited to aspirin, clopidogrel and/or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants for > 3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study.
* History of platelet agglutination abnormality that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
* All subjects with secondary immune thrombocytopenia, including those with laboratory or clinical evidence of HIV infection, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, chronic hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C virus infection, or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. If a potential subject has no clinical history that would support HIV infection or hepatitis infection, no further laboratory screening is necessary; however, standard medical practice would suggest further evaluation of patients who have risk factors for these infections.
* A subject is planning to have cataract surgery.
* In France, a subject is neither affiliated with nor a beneficiary of a social security category.
Other Eligibility Criteria Considerations:
To assess any potential impact on subject eligibility with regard to safety, the investigator must refer to the following document(s) for detailed information regarding warnings, precautions, contraindications, adverse events, and other significant data pertaining to the investigational product(s) being used in this study: CIB, SPM.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/06/2006
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/07/2015
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
302
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Novartis investigative Site - Garran
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2606 - Garran
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Jiang Su Province
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Tianjin
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Olomouc
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Praha 2
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Odense
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Kuopio
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Caen cedex 9
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Créteil
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Pessac
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Bayern
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Hessen
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Niedersachsen
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Saarland
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Shatin, New Territories
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Emilia-Romagna
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Lazio
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Lombardia
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Veneto
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Amersfoort
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Den Haag
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Nijmegen
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Rotterdam
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Grafton
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Takapuna, Auckland
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Pakistan
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Karachi
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Pakistan
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Lahore
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Peru
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Lima
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Slupsk
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Torun
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Bucharest
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Novosibirsk
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
St Petersburg
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Kosice
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Presov
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Slovenia
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Ljubljana
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Badalona/Barcelona
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Palma de Mallorca
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Pamplona
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Santiago de Compostela
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Göteborg
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Khon Kaen
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Montfleury
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Sfax
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Sousse
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Tunisia
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Tunis
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Dnipropetrovsk
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Lviv
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Devon
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Somerset
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Liverpool
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Reading
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Swansea
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Vietnam
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Ho Chi Minh
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
An open-label, dose-adjustment, extension study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for the treatment of subjects with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have previously been enrolled in an eltrombopag trial. This study will allow adjustment of the eltrombopag dose to achieve an individualized dose and schedule for each subject. In addition, the ability to reduce the dose of concomitant ITP medications in the presence of eltrombopag, while maintaining platelet counts = 50,000/µL will be investigated.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00351468
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Wong RSM, Saleh MN, Khelif A, Salama A, Portella MSO, Burgess P, Bussel JB. Safety and efficacy of long-term treatment of chronic/persistent ITP with eltrombopag: final results of the EXTEND study. Blood. 2017 Dec 7;130(23):2527-2536. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-748707. Epub 2017 Oct 17. Erratum In: Blood. 2018 Feb 8;131(6):709. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-12-823252. Tarantino MD, Fogarty P, Mayer B, Vasey SY, Brainsky A. Efficacy of eltrombopag in management of bleeding symptoms associated with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013 Apr;24(3):284-96. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835fac99. Saleh MN, Bussel JB, Cheng G, Meyer O, Bailey CK, Arning M, Brainsky A; EXTEND Study Group. Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia: results of the long-term, open-label EXTEND study. Blood. 2013 Jan 17;121(3):537-45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-425512. Epub 2012 Nov 20. Fogarty PF, Tarantino MD, Brainsky A, Signorovitch J, Grotzinger KM. Selective validation of the WHO Bleeding Scale in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):79-87. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.644849. Epub 2011 Dec 20. Signorovitch J, Brainsky A, Grotzinger KM. Validation of the FACIT-fatigue subscale, selected items from FACT-thrombocytopenia, and the SF-36v2 in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1737-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9912-9. Epub 2011 May 1.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00351468
Download to PDF
Show all queries