Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05360394
Registration number
NCT05360394
Ethics application status
Date submitted
26/04/2022
Date registered
4/05/2022
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Stent Graft and Drug Coated Balloon Treatment for Recurrent Cephalic Arch Stenosis in Dysfunctional Arteriovenous-venous Fistula
Query!
Scientific title
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Stent Graft and Drug Coated Balloon Treatment for Recurrent Cephalic Arch Stenosis in Dysfunctional Arteriovenous-venous Fistula
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2021/2044
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
PREDATOR
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Neointimal Hyperplasia
0
0
Query!
Dialysis Access Malfunction
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Other
0
0
0
0
Query!
Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
Treatment: Devices - Paclitaxel Coated Balloon and Stent Graft
Active comparator: PCB Only - Cephalic arch stenosis is first treated with conventional plain balloon angioplasty. Once treated adequately (\<30% residual stenosis), CAS will be treated with PCB angioplasty.
Experimental: Stent Graft and PCB angioplasty of stent edges - CAS is first treated with conventional plain balloon angioplasty. Once treated adequately (\<30% residual stenosis), CAS will be treated with PCB first to avoid geographical miss. After which, stent graft will be deployed. Length of PCB shall be long enough to cover stent edges.
Treatment: Devices: Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
CAS treated with PCB only
Treatment: Devices: Paclitaxel Coated Balloon and Stent Graft
CAS treated with PCB first before deployment of stent graft
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Primary Patency of Target Lesion (Cepahlic Arch)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Freedom from any re-intervention at target lesion that is clinically driven or indicated on surveillance scan
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
6-months post-op
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Primary Patency of Access Circuit
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Percentage of patients who do not need to undergo another re-intervention at the dialysis access circuit
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
6-months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Primary Patency of Target Lesion
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Percentage of patients who do not need to undergo another re-intervention at the target lesion
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
3 and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Primary Patency of Access Circuit
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Freedom from any re-intervention that is clinically driven or indicated on surveillance scan
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
3 and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Assisted Primary Patency of Target Lesion
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Percentage of patients who do not need to undergo another thrombolysis or thrombectomy at target lesion.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
3 and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Assisted Primary Patency of Access Circuit
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Percentage of patients who do not need to undergo another thrombolysis or thrombectomy at dialysis access circuit
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
3 and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Secondary Patency
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Percentage of patients who will not need creation of a new AVF or an alternative dialysis access site.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
3 and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Time taken to next intervention
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
12-months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Number of repeat interventions to target lesion
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
6 and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Number of repeat interventions to maintain access circuit
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
6 and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Rate of late lumen loss of the cephalic arch, proximal and distal stent edge
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Complication Rate
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-op
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Age 21 - 90 years
* Patients who requires balloon angioplasty for dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula, can be de novo lesions or recurrent CAS stenosis within six months of interventions. Suitability will be determined with a baseline ultrasound assessment.
* Matured AVF, defined as being in use for at least 1 month prior to angioplasty
* Successful angioplasty of the underlying stenosis, defined as less than 30% residual stenosis on Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA).
Query!
Minimum age
21
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
90
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Patient unable to provide informed consent
* Thrombosed or partially thrombosed AVF
* Immature AVF
* Insignificant CAS defined as <50% stenosis and no clinical indicator such as high V pressure.
* Presence of central vein stenosis with more than 30% residual stenosis post-angioplasty
* Patient who had underwent stent placement within the CAS previously
* Patients who are allergic to both aspirin or clopidogrel
* Patient who are currently enrolled in other drug eluting balloon trials
* Sepsis or active infection
* Recent intracranial bleed or gastrointestinal bleed within the past 12 months.
* Allergy to iodinated contrast media, heparin or paclitaxel
* Pregnancy
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Factorial
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
UNKNOWN
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
20/04/2022
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/04/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
80
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Flinders Medical Center - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
5042 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Singapore General Hospital
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) is a surgically created circuit used for hemodialysis in patient with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). A functioning dialysis vascular access is critical to the delivery of life-saving hemodialysis (HD) treatment for these patients. Unfortunately, neointimal hyperplasia frequently occurs within the dialysis vascular access, resulting in stenosis, poor flow and thrombosis with loss of function. The cephalic vein forms the outflow conduit for radiocephalic (RC) and brachiocephalic (BC) AVF. At the perpendicular portion of the cephalic vein, the cephalic arch is often prone to developing hemodynamically significant stenosis. The prevalence of cephalic arch stenosis is reported to be 39% in brachiocepahlic and 2% in radiocephalic AVF. The current gold standard therapy for treatment of AVF stenosis is plain balloon angioplasty (BA). Paclitaxel coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty has also been shown recently to be superior to plain BA in the treatment of stenosis in dialysis vascular access. By releasing paclitaxel, which is an anti-proliferation drug, locally into the vessel wall during balloon contact, it will blunt the acceleration of intimal hyperplasia response, resulting in improved primary patency after angioplasty. The use of stent grafts for recurrent CAS has been demonstrated to increase patency of AVF compared to BA and bare stents. However, stent grafts are prone to edge restenosis that tend to occur within 5mm of each end of SG due to neointimal hyperplasia from the end of the stent migrating towards the center. We postulate that stent graft with PCB angioplasty of the stent edge is more effective than PCB alone in maintaining the patency of AVF with cephalic arch stenosis. Therefore, we aim to perform a randomized controlled trial to compare the 6-month unassisted patency rate of treatment of recurrent CAS with stent graft and PCB angioplasty of both stent edge versus PCB alone.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05360394
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Roy-Chaudhury P, Sukhatme VP, Cheung AK. Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: a cellular and molecular viewpoint. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Apr;17(4):1112-27. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050615. Rajan DK, Clark TW, Patel NK, Stavropoulos SW, Simons ME. Prevalence and treatment of cephalic arch stenosis in dysfunctional autogenous hemodialysis fistulas. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 May;14(5):567-73. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000071090.76348.bc. Trerotola SO, Roy-Chaudhury P, Saad TF. Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Failing Arteriovenous Fistulas: More Data, Less Clarity. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Jul;78(1):13-15. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.02.331. Epub 2021 May 8. No abstract available. Irani FG, Teo TKB, Tay KH, Yin WH, Win HH, Gogna A, Patel A, Too CW, Chan SXJM, Lo RHG, Toh LHW, Chng SP, Choong HL, Tan BS. Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula and Graft Stenoses: Randomized Trial Comparing Drug-eluting Balloon Angioplasty with Conventional Angioplasty. Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):238-247. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170806. Epub 2018 Jul 24. Swinnen JJ, Hitos K, Kairaitis L, Gruenewald S, Larcos G, Farlow D, Huber D, Cassorla G, Leo C, Villalba LM, Allen R, Niknam F, Burgess D. Multicentre, randomised, blinded, control trial of drug-eluting balloon vs Sham in recurrent native dialysis fistula stenoses. J Vasc Access. 2019 May;20(3):260-269. doi: 10.1177/1129729818801556. Epub 2018 Sep 18. Shemesh D, Goldin I, Zaghal I, Berlowitz D, Raveh D, Olsha O. Angioplasty with stent graft versus bare stent for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1524-31, 1531.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.071. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Rajan DK, Falk A. A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes of Angioplasty versus VIABAHN Stent-Graft Placement for Cephalic Arch Stenosis in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Accesses. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.001. Ginsburg M, Lorenz JM, Zivin SP, Zangan S, Martinez D. A practical review of the use of stents for the maintenance of hemodialysis access. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Jun;32(2):217-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549844. No abstract available.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Tang Tjun Yip
Query!
Address
0
0
Singapore General Hospital
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Charyl Yap
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
6576 7986
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05360394