Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609000597291
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
13/07/2009
Date registered
20/07/2009
Date last updated
8/03/2016
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A pilot study evaluating the effect of platelet transfusion using an electromechanical infusion pump versus conventional gravity flow method
Query!
Scientific title
A pilot study evaluating the effect of platelet
transfusion method administered via an electromechanical infusion pump versus conventional gravity flow method on quality and quantity of transfused platelets
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
288711
0
nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
PLATTRANS
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Platelet transfusion
236921
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Blood
237279
237279
0
0
Query!
Haematological diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Our current practice at the Launceston General Hospital (LGH) and many other medical centres in Australia is to administer platelets via a free flowing gravity line. However there are a few reports that employ a pump during platelet-administration as an acceptable practice. Administration of platelets via a pump would ensure the platelets are infused in a timely fashion but in the meantime, we should ensure that the pumping action will not damage the platelets. There are 4 methods for platelets transfusion including 3 pumps currently available on the oncology ward at the LGH and used for red cell transfusion; 1. The Graseby 3000 2. the Imed Gemini PC-1 and PC-2 (double pump) and 3. Baxter Pump. Furthermore the pump offers well controlled infusion rate, accurate volume measurement and an alarm system for monitoring infusion.
1. gravity flow method - platelets transfused over approximately 30 minutes; 2. Transfusion using the Graseby 3000 takes approximately 15-20 minutes; 3. Transfusion using the Imed Gemini PC-1 and PC-2 (double pump) takes approximately 20 minutes.
4.Transfusion using the baxter pump takes approximately 20 minutes
There is very little data, if any, comparing the effect of the above two recognised methods on platelet-increment after transfusion.
This pilot study is aiming to determine whether infusion method influences the quality and quantity of platelets transfused. Also to determine the most efficient procedure for the administration of platelets either via electromechanical pump or through gravity method. The study will take place until end of Dec 2009.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
236710
0
Other interventions
Query!
Intervention code [2]
236924
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Although both methods for platelets transfusion utilising both either electromechanical pump or through free flowing gravity are well recognised and considered as standard treatment, there is little data available regarding a comparison of the two methods, which their applications vary according the treatment centre in Australia and the rest of the world.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
238092
0
The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate whether infusion method influences the quality and quantity of platelets transfused.
Platelets count and function will be assessed after transfusion via full blood count and flow cytometry techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
238092
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
238092
0
Main outcome will be measured by platelet count prior to transfusion and platelet count increment after 60 min of completion of transfusion as well as 24 hours post platelet transfusion recovery as per current
standard practice.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
242293
0
To determine the most efficient procedure for the administration of platelets.
Also whether the rate and method of transfusion influences the quality and quantity of platelets transfused. Platelets count and function will be assessed after transfusion via full blood count and flow cytometry techniques.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
242293
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
242293
0
Until the end of study Dec 2009
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
244812
0
Other factors that might influence platelet recovery include presence of infection/ Dissiminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), drugs administration and occurrence of transfusion reactions. These will be studied and recorded as per protocol for correlation with platelet recovery.
Studying the effect of the rate of transfusion via a pump will also be examined and recorded.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
244812
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
244812
0
Until the end of study Dec 2009
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients requiring a platelet infusion.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patients with severe infection/ sepsis with temperature>38.5 C.
2. Patients with coagulopathy / DIC
3. Patients with platelet refractoriness e.g. platelet antibody or human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody.
4. Patients under the age of 18 years.
5. Patients with an intellectual or mental impairment.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
We anticipate that almost 120 participants could be enrolled in our trial per year; 30-40 in each arm. Patients will be randomised 1:1:1 into three groups with an equal male to female ratio as possible. Group 1: gravity flow, Group 2: electromechanical pump used at LGH for platelts transfusion and Group 3: other electromechanical pump that used at LGH for platelts transfusion.
Allocation was randomly concealed with random numbered containers at the central administration site.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2007
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
31/01/2012
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
240
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
171
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
TAS
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
237098
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
237098
0
Clifford Craig Medical Trust Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
237098
0
PO Box 1963
Launceston
Tasmania, 7250
Query!
Country [1]
237098
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name
Clifford Craig Medical Trust Foundation
Query!
Address
PO Box 1963
Launceston
Tasmania, 7250
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
4602
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
4602
0
Launceston General Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
4602
0
Charles Street, Launceston
Tasmania, 7250
Query!
Country [1]
4602
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
239197
0
Tasmania Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee EC00337
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
239197
0
Executive Officer University of Tasmania (UTAS) Research and Development Office GPO Box 252-01 Hobart Tasmania 7001
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
239197
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
239197
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
239197
0
03/03/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
239197
0
H0009779
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Our current practice at the Launceston General Hospital (LGH) and many centres in Australia is to administer platelets via a free flowing gravity line. However there are a few reports that employ a pump during platelet-administration as an acceptable practice. Administration of platelets via a pump would ensure the platelets are infused in a timely fashion but in the meantime, we should ensure that the pumping action will not damage the platelets. There are 2 pumps currently available on the oncology ward at the LGH and used for red cell transfusion; the Graseby 3000 and the Imed Gemini PC-1 and PC-2 (double pump). Furthermore the pump offers wellcontrolled infusion rate, accurate volume measurement and an alarm system for monitoring infusion. There is very little data, if any, comparing the effect of the above two recognised methods on platelet-increment after transfusion. This pilot study is aiming to determine whether infusion method influences the quality and quantity of platelets transfused. Also to determine the most efficient procedure for the administration of platelets.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Alhossain A. Khalafallah, Abdul Majeed Al-Barzan, Annette Camino, Iain K. Robertson, Gerald Bates Dawn Richardson, Catherine Austen, David Seaton, Wolfgang Heller and Terry Brain. An Open-Labelled, Randomized Cross-Over Study of the Effect of Electromechanical Pumps versus Conventional Gravity Flow on Platelet Transfusion in Adult Haematology Patients. Transfus Med Hemother 2013;40:22–26. DOI: 10.1159/000345681. http://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/345681 http://scholar.google.com.au/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=7Ntik6EAAAAJ&cstart=20&citation_for_view=7Ntik6EAAAAJ:Se3iqnhoufwC
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
29699
0
Prof Alhossain A. Khalafallah
Query!
Address
29699
0
Launceston General Hospital,
Charles Street, Launceston, TAS 7250
Query!
Country
29699
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
29699
0
+61367776777
Query!
Fax
29699
0
Query!
Email
29699
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
12946
0
Assoc Prof Alhossain Khalafallah
Query!
Address
12946
0
Launceston General Hospital
Charles St
Launceston
Tasmania 7250
Query!
Country
12946
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
12946
0
+613 6348 7111
Query!
Fax
12946
0
Query!
Email
12946
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
3874
0
Assoc Prof Alhossain Khalafallah
Query!
Address
3874
0
Launceston General Hospital
Charles St
Launceston
Tasmania 7250
Query!
Country
3874
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
3874
0
+613 6348 7111
Query!
Fax
3874
0
Query!
Email
3874
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
An open-labelled, randomized cross-over study of the effect of electromechanical pumps versus conventional gravity flow on platelet transfusion in adult haematology patients.
2013
https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000345681
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF