Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12609000922279
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/10/2009
Date registered
27/10/2009
Date last updated
9/07/2012
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison of plantar pressure and of osteomuscular symptoms by means the use of customized and prefabricated arch supports in the work environment
Query!
Scientific title
The effect of customised and prefabricated arch supports on plantar pressure and osteomuscular symptoms in female assembly line workers
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
1120
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1112-2063
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
osteomuscular symptoms
252047
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
252237
252237
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
252238
252238
0
0
Query!
Occupational therapy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
ethylvinylacetate arch supports that were individually customized for participants allocated to this intervention, during eight weeks at work (5 days per week for approximately 8 hours per day)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
241445
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
pre-fabricated arch supports during work days (5 days per week for approximately 8 hours per day) for a total duration of 8 weeks.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
253111
0
The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was administered and plantar pressure was determined using a computerized baropodometric system (FootWork). Plantar pressure values were obtained using an electronic plantar pressure plate (FootWork, AM3-IST, France), connected to a microcomputer (Pentium III). The system has 2704 active surface sensors, with a frequency of 150 Hz
Query!
Assessment method [1]
253111
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
253111
0
before intervention, 4 weeks and 8 weeks following randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
257982
0
nil
Query!
Assessment method [1]
257982
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
257982
0
nil
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
women remain standing throughout their daily work shift, wearing the same shoes and cutting leather for the confection of dog chew bones, with signs and symptoms of work-related musculoskeletal conditions in the lumbar region or lower limbs developed while performing the current bone-confection job were included in the study.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
37
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
were excluded for symptoms the onset of which occurred prior their work activities at the firm, systemic diseases, structural deformity or previous trauma
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
central randomisation by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
computerised sequence numbers
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
10/08/2007
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
27
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
2291
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [1]
2291
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
243915
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
243915
0
To the Brazilian agency Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior for financial support, based on the Postgraduate Social Demand Program in Health Sciences of the Faculdade de Medicina de Sao Jose do Rio Preto.
Query!
Address [1]
243915
0
Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 5416 - Vila Sao Pedro - 15090-000
Sao Jose do Rio Preto - SP
Query!
Country [1]
243915
0
Brazil
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Josiane Schadeck de Almeida
Query!
Address
Rua 22, 2111 – Centro, Jales, SP, Brazil CEP: 15700-000
Query!
Country
Brazil
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
251264
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
251264
0
Guaracy Carvalho Filho
Query!
Address [1]
251264
0
Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 5416 - Vila Sao Pedro - 15090-000
Sao Jose do Rio Preto - SP
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Query!
Country [1]
251264
0
Brazil
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [2]
251265
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
251265
0
Carlos Marcelo Pastre
Query!
Address [2]
251265
0
Physiotherapy Department, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Roberto Simonsen, 305. CEP:19060-900, Presidente Prudente, SP
Query!
Country [2]
251265
0
Brazil
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [3]
251266
0
Individual
Query!
Name [3]
251266
0
Carlos Roberto Padovani
Query!
Address [3]
251266
0
Departament of Biostatistics, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade Estadual Paulista,
18618970 Botucatu - SP
Distrito de Rubiao Junior
Query!
Country [3]
251266
0
Brazil
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [4]
251267
0
Individual
Query!
Name [4]
251267
0
Rodrigo Alberto Mendes Dispato Martins
Query!
Address [4]
251267
0
Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 5416 - Vila Sao Pedro - 15090-000
Sao Jose do Rio Preto - SP
Query!
Country [4]
251267
0
Brazil
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
244029
0
Research Ethics Committee of Faculdade de Medicina de Sao Jose do Rio Preto
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
244029
0
CEP - Comite de Etica em Pesquisa Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 5416 Bairro: Sao Pedro Sao Jose do Rio Preto -SP CEP: 15090-000
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
244029
0
Brazil
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
244029
0
10/08/2005
Query!
Approval date [1]
244029
0
07/11/2005
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
244029
0
6032/2005
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
OBJECTIVE: Compare the effect of the use of two types of arch supports (customized and prefabricated) on the behavior of plantar weight load and osteomuscular symptoms in assembly line workers. METHODS: A randomized trial was carried out with 27 female workers who worked in an orthostatic position, with a mean age of 30.3 ± 7.09 years and weight of 64.85 ± 13.65 Kg, and had osteomuscular symptoms. The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was administered and plantar pressure was determined using a computerized baropodometric system (FootWork). The sample was then divided into control group, which wore pre-fabricated arch supports, and intervention group, with wore ethylvinylacetate arch supports during eight weeks. Baropodometric data were collected and the questionnaire was administered again.RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison between groups and baropodometric data. However, a change was noted in the behavior of the load variables between evaluations, with an increase in mean load pressure and maximal plantar pressure (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between groups for any anatomical site in the different evaluations. Within each group, there was a reduction in foot pain and back pain between evaluations (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Both types of arch support reduced pain symptoms in the lumbar region and feet. After eight weeks of use, there was an increase in maximal and mean plantar pressure and a reduction in plantar surface area with both types of arch support.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
30410
0
Query!
Address
30410
0
Query!
Country
30410
0
Query!
Phone
30410
0
Query!
Fax
30410
0
Query!
Email
30410
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
13657
0
Josiane Schadeck de Almeida
Query!
Address
13657
0
Av, João Amadeu, 2160 Centro, Jales, SP, Brazil CEP: 15700-000
Query!
Country
13657
0
Brazil
Query!
Phone
13657
0
+55 1736323010
Query!
Fax
13657
0
+55 1736323010
Query!
Email
13657
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
4585
0
Josiane Schadeck de Almeida
Query!
Address
4585
0
Av, João Amadeu, 2160 Centro, Jales, SP, Brazil CEP: 15700-000
Query!
Country
4585
0
Brazil
Query!
Phone
4585
0
+55 1736323010
Query!
Fax
4585
0
Query!
Email
4585
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Comparison of two types of insoles on musculoskeletal symptoms and plantar pressure distribution in a work environment: A randomized clinical trial.
2016
https://dx.doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2016.1301
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF