Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12611000486921
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
4/04/2011
Date registered
10/05/2011
Date last updated
10/05/2011
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The PASS study: A performance assessment system for success in residential aged care
Query!
Scientific title
Performance assessment system for success (PASS) in residential aged care
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
259628
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
The PASS trial
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Quality of care
265517
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
265687
265687
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Three monthly benchmarking information for selected quality indicators provided at month six then three monthly to month 15 to both arms of the study. In addition quality improvment activites interventions were provided to the intervention arm including: one individual site visit by an advanced practice gerontological nurse to explain the benchmarking; how the results could be used to improve resident outcomes and provide support with the intervention; a best practice quality tool kit for the prevention harm; voiced over power point education sessions of best practice in the prevention of harm that could be used at any time by facility staff and two quality forums by telephone conferencing. the intervention was implemented after six months of data collection over a three month period. The resources provided were designed to be able to be used by the hospital over the final 6 months of the study as well
Query!
Intervention code [1]
264332
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Three monthly benchmarking information for selected quality indicators provided at month 6, 9,12 and 15. Quality indicator for fall, pressure ulcers, restraint use, urinary tract infections and indwelling urinary catheters was analysed using means for each facility and graphed. The three monthly benchmarking reports were placed on the password protected website for ease of access by the facilities. The facilites identified their data by their confidential research ID. All particpants were able to access webiste for the benckmarking reports.
At months 6 and 15 staffing hours per resident per day for all direct care staff were benchmarked and a Shortells staff survey was also benchmarked at months 6 and 15.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
266446
0
Reduction in adverse outcomes for the residents in residential aged care hospitals from pre to post intervention as measure by significance for the quality improvement activities group measured at individual resident level
Query!
Assessment method [1]
266446
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
266446
0
6 months pre intervention of data collection, 3 months intervention and 6 months post intervention of data collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
273794
0
Reduction in adverse outcomes for the residents in residential aged care hospitals from pre to post intervention as measure by significance for the benchmarking measured at individual resident level
Query!
Assessment method [1]
273794
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
273794
0
6 months pre intervention of data collection, 3 months intervention and 6 months post intervention of data collection
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All RAC providers that were listed as a’ hospital’ from the Northland, Waitemata, Auckland, Counties Manukau, Waikato, and the Bay of Plenty District Health Boards on the Ministry of Health certification list, June 2008 and held an Age Related Residential Care Service Provider Agreement with their local District Health Board and provided continuing hopsital level care.
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Continuing care Hospitals operated by District Health Boards were excluded as they have additional funding streams and different case mix.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Continuing care hospitals were recruited, rather than individual residents, as the intervention was focused on influencing the actions of staff in caring out care processes provided to residents. To ensure that the sampling frame was as large as possible it was decided to invite all 137 eligible continuing hospitals to participate. once recruitment was completed and consents were obtained blinding of researchers to allocation status was achieved by providing a biostatistician with the participants’ research numbers and the number of beds in each facility and she undertook the process of cluster randomisation
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Cluster randomisation was used to achieve a probability sampling strategy that involved successive random sampling of the hospitals progressing from large to small in bed numbers. Cluster sampling requires computing the mean for the individual sampling unit and multiplying this by the number of units in the population to determine the population's estimated value. The precision limit on this estimate was also be computed.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2008
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
3208
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
3208
0
Auckland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
264796
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
264796
0
University of Auckland
Query!
Address [1]
264796
0
The School of Nursing
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92019
Auckland Mail Centre 1142, New Zealand
Query!
Country [1]
264796
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Auckland
Query!
Address
The School of Nursing
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92019
Auckland Mail Centre 1142, New Zealand
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
263908
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
263908
0
Query!
Address [1]
263908
0
Query!
Country [1]
263908
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
266770
0
New Zealand Ministry of Health Multi-Regional Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
266770
0
c/- Ministry of Health 1-3 The Terrace Level 1 Wellington 6011
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
266770
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
266770
0
01/04/2008
Query!
Approval date [1]
266770
0
01/05/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
266770
0
MEC/08/16/EXP
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study seeks to identify how providers of hospital level residential aged care can improve their performance in keeping residetns free from harm. This will be achieved by gaining an understanding of good outcomes for residents and what measures these outcomes, then using selected quality indicators to measure the quality of basic care provided to indivdual residents. The study will establish if benchmarking quality indicator data alone or whether additional quality improvement activities support increases the number of days residents are free from harm or and adverse event. Finally this information will be utilised to develop a balanced score card for success.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
32232
0
Query!
Address
32232
0
Query!
Country
32232
0
Query!
Phone
32232
0
Query!
Fax
32232
0
Query!
Email
32232
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
15479
0
Noeline Whitehead
Query!
Address
15479
0
1/38 Tawhiri Rd
One Tree Hill
Auckland 1061
Query!
Country
15479
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
15479
0
64 9 6366296
Query!
Fax
15479
0
Query!
Email
15479
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
6407
0
Noeline Whitehead
Query!
Address
6407
0
1/38 Tawhiri Rd
One Tree Hill
Auckland 1061
Query!
Country
6407
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
6407
0
64 9 6366296
Query!
Fax
6407
0
Query!
Email
6407
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF