Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12611001021965
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/09/2011
Date registered
23/09/2011
Date last updated
10/07/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
10/07/2019
Date results provided
10/07/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A pilot trial of a hypertonic saline bolus in early sepsis
Query!
Scientific title
A pilot randomised trial comparing the inflammatory response to hypertonic saline versus normal saline as the initial fluid bolus in adults presenting to the emergency department with presumed early sepsis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
263088
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1124-7095
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Sepsis
270839
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
271019
271019
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
271023
271023
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Single intravenous bolus of 5ml/kg of hypertonic (3%) saline solution
Query!
Intervention code [1]
269437
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Single intravenous bolus of 10ml/kg of normal (0.9%) saline solution
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
279680
0
Circulating levels of interleukin-1 (used as an indicative inflammatory cytokine) compared to baseline level before fluid bolus. 3.5 mL serum tubes are collected from the patients at the requisite timepoints, allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 minutes to clot then centrifuged at 800g for 10 minutes at 4 deg C. Serum and plasma samples are aliquotted, stored immediately at -80 deg C and subsequently analysed using ELISA.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
279680
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
279680
0
1, 3 and 24 hours after fluid bolus
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
294186
0
Inflammatory gene activation and expression measured using qPCR compared to baseline level before fluid bolus. At the requisite timepoints 2.5mL PAXGene tubes are collected. The PAXgene tube is placed immediately at 4 deg C before being transferred to -20 deg C with 72 hours, and then transferred to -80 deg C for long-term storage and subsequent qPCR analysis.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294186
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294186
0
1, 3 and 24 hours after fluid bolus
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
294187
0
Bacterial load compared to baseline level before fluid bolus. Bacterial load is measured from PAXGene tubes as above.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
294187
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
294187
0
1, 3 and 24 hours after fluid bolus
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
294188
0
Haemodynamic parameters (e.g. mean arterial pressure, systolic pressure, heart rate measured non-invasively using standard equipment) compared to baseline level before fluid bolus
Query!
Assessment method [3]
294188
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
294188
0
1, 3 and 24 hours after fluid bolus
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
294189
0
Mortality measured by review of medical records and, where necessary, telephone follow up
Query!
Assessment method [4]
294189
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
294189
0
28 days from enrolment
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Suspected or proven infection
2. Two or more SIRS criteria (HR>90/min, RR>20/min, T>38 deg C, WCC>12 (or temp<36 deg C and WCC<4))
3. Fluid bolus indicated clinically
4. Informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Contraindication to volume loading (e.g. coexistent acute pulmonary oedema)
2. Severe hypotension (SBP<90) requiring immediate resuscitation
3. Plasma sodium concentration outside normal range (135-145 mEq/L)
4. Established significant metabolic acidosis (venous pH <7.25)
5. Established significant renal failure eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73m2
6. Pregnancy
7. Age less than 16 years of age
8. Deemed for palliative/supportive care only
9. Received prehospital IV fluids >500 mL in total
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Eligible patients will be identified by clinical staff working in the emergency department and , once informed consent is obtained, allocation will occur by logging on to a secure website that will randomise the patient to their treatment group. The staff identifying inclusion criteria is therefore unaware to which arm the patient will be randomised until after they consent the patient and log on to the website.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Patients will be randomised in real time utilising a web based randomisation system
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/11/2011
Query!
Actual
19/11/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/04/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/05/2015
Query!
Sample size
Target
70
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
65
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
269910
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
269910
0
Royal Perth Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
269910
0
GPO Box X2213
Perth WA
6847
Query!
Country [1]
269910
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Perth Hospital
Query!
Address
GPO Box X2213
Perth WA
6847
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
268922
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
268922
0
Query!
Address [1]
268922
0
Query!
Country [1]
268922
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
271878
0
Royal Perth Hospital HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
271878
0
GPO Box X2213 Perth WA 6847
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
271878
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
271878
0
06/07/2011
Query!
Approval date [1]
271878
0
12/09/2011
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
271878
0
EC 2011-091
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Patients with sepsis have the potential to become very unwell in a rapid period. The progression from being moderately unwell to severely unwell may be due to the body’s immune system responding to the infection, rather than the infection itself. A fundamental and accepted practice in the management of patients with suspected sepsis is the administration of intravenous fluids. There is no consensus that any particular fluid is better than the other. In particular, we do not know whether any time of fluid has a beneficial effect on this immune response to infection. Hypertonic saline fluid has been shown in some animal and human studies to influence the immune response to infection. In this pilot study we will assess whether hypertonic saline has an advantage over normal saline in producing beneficial immunomodulation. If this can be shown, it will inform the design of a larger multicentre trial with clinical endpoints.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
33190
0
A/Prof Glenn Arendts
Query!
Address
33190
0
CCREM Emergency Department, Royal Perth Hospital GPO Box X2213 Perth WA 6847
Query!
Country
33190
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
33190
0
61 8 92248458
Query!
Fax
33190
0
Query!
Email
33190
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
16437
0
Sophie Damianopoulos
Query!
Address
16437
0
CCREM
Emergency Department, Royal Perth Hospital
GPO Box X2213
Perth WA 6847
Query!
Country
16437
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
16437
0
61 8 92248458
Query!
Fax
16437
0
Query!
Email
16437
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
7365
0
Glenn Arendts
Query!
Address
7365
0
CCREM
Emergency Department, Royal Perth Hospital
GPO Box X2213
Perth WA 6847
Query!
Country
7365
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
7365
0
61 8 92248458
Query!
Fax
7365
0
Query!
Email
7365
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Trial was envisaged, designed and approved before these requirements became commonplace.The PICF for this trial clearly states that only the investigators will have access to participant data, and it is unethical to now share these data
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Bolus therapy with 3% hypertonic saline or 0.9% saline in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis: A pilot randomised controlled trial.
2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.03.009
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF