Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12611001029987
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
27/09/2011
Date registered
28/09/2011
Date last updated
17/03/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Validation of a Checklist for Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills Assessment
Query!
Scientific title
Validation of a Checklist for Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills Assessment
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
263117
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Workplace based assessment tool
270869
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
279047
279047
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Validation of a direct observed procedural skills assessment tool for regional anaesthesia. This tool is constructed as a checklist with objective criteria for satisfactory completion of procedural tasks in the performance of a nerve block. This checklist is completed immediately after the nerve block is performed.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
269458
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
expert assessors using scripted videos versus clinical videos
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
279699
0
validation of checklist by inter-rater comparison between expert assessors
Query!
Assessment method [1]
279699
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
279699
0
immediately after procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
294253
0
nil
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294253
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294253
0
nil
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All patients presenting for surgery and labour ward requiring regional anaesthesia
All anaesthesia trainees
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
incapacity, inability, and/or refusal to give informed consent for participation
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Psychosocial
Query!
Duration
Cross-sectional
Query!
Selection
Random sample
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
inter-rater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients and kappa statistic
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/02/2012
Query!
Actual
3/06/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
29/08/2014
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
70
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
70
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
269941
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
269941
0
Nil
Query!
Address [1]
269941
0
Nil
Query!
Country [1]
269941
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Liverpool Hospital
Query!
Address
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool, Sydney
NSW 2170
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
268939
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
268939
0
Nil
Query!
Address [1]
268939
0
Nil
Query!
Country [1]
268939
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
271915
0
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
271915
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
271915
0
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
271915
0
01/10/2011
Query!
Approval date [1]
271915
0
29/06/2012
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
271915
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary outcome of this study is to establish construct validity and reliability of the RAPS checklist. Construct validity describes the ability of the tool to measure the criteria under assessment, and its discriminatory power to differentiate novice versus skilled proceduralists. Reliability of the tool is its ability to be reproducible between different assessors.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Chuan A et al. Design and validation of the Regional Anaesthesia Procedural Skills Assessment Tool. Anaesthesia 2015; 70(12): 1401-1411
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
33205
0
Dr Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
33205
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Level 1
New Clinical Building
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country
33205
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
33205
0
+61 407 743 668
Query!
Fax
33205
0
Query!
Email
33205
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
16452
0
Dr Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
16452
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Level 1
New Clinical Building
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country
16452
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
16452
0
+61 407743668
Query!
Fax
16452
0
Query!
Email
16452
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
7380
0
Dr Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
7380
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Level 1
New Clinical Building
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country
7380
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
7380
0
+61 407743668
Query!
Fax
7380
0
Query!
Email
7380
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF