Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01583374
Registration number
NCT01583374
Ethics application status
Date submitted
20/04/2012
Date registered
24/04/2012
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Apremilast to Treat Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
Query!
Scientific title
A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL-GROUP STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF APREMILAST (CC-10004) IN THE TREATMENT OF ACTIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2011-001555-37
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CC-10004-AS-001
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
POSTURE
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Apremilast tablet 20 mg
Treatment: Drugs - Apremilast tablet 30 mg BID
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: Apremilast 20 mg - Apremilast 20 mg was taken orally twice a day (BID)
Experimental: Apremilast 30 mg - Apremilast 30 mg was taken orally twice a day
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Identically matched placebo tablets were taken orally twice a day
Treatment: Drugs: Apremilast tablet 20 mg
Apremilast 20 mg was taken orally twice a day (BID)
Treatment: Drugs: Apremilast tablet 30 mg BID
Apremilast 30 mg was taken orally twice a day
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Identically matched placebo tablets were taken orally twice a day during the placebo controlled phase.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20 (ASAS 20) Response at Week 16
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ASAS 20 was defined as achieving an improvement from baseline of = 20% and = 1 unit in at least 3 of 4 ASAS domains on a scale of 0 to 10 units and no worsening from baseline of = 20% and = 1 unit in the remaining ASAS domain on a scale of 0 to 10 units. The 4 ASAS domains are:
1. Patient Global Assessment of Disease (0 - 10 unit Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\]); participant marks a box with an X on a 0 - 10 unit NRS; the left-hand box of 0 = not active and the right-hand box = very active
2. Total Back Pain (0 to 10 unit NRS); participant marks a box with an X on a 0 - 10 unit NRS; the left-hand box of 0 = "no pain" and the right-hand box = "most severe pain"
3. Function (Bath AS Functional Index \[BASFI\] NRS 0 - 10 unit); participant provides a self-administered survey of 10 questions assessing for degree of mobility and functional ability
4. Inflammation domain is determined by the mean of 2 Bath AS Disease Activity Index NRS Questions #5 and #6 for morning stiffness) (0 - 10 unit)
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and Week 16
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The BASFI is a composite score based on a self-administered survey of 10 questions using a 0 to 10 unit numerical rating scale (NRS) that assesses the degree of mobility and functional ability. The survey consists of 8 questions regarding function in AS and the last 2 reflect the ability to manage everyday life. The patient marks a box with an X on a 0 to 10 unit NRS for 10 questions; the left-hand box of 0 = easy; the right-hand box = impossible. The resulting 0 to 100 score is divided by 10 to give a final 0 to 10 BASFI score. The overall score is the mean of the 10 items and ranges from 0 to 10. A higher score correlates to reduced functional ability.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline and Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The BASDAI is a composite score based on a participant self-administered survey of six questions measured using a 0 to 10 unit numerical rating scale (NRS) that assessed the participants' five major symptoms of AS: 1) fatigue; 2) spinal pain; 3) peripheral joint pain/swelling; 4) areas of localized tenderness; 5a) morning stiffness severity upon wakening; 5b) morning stiffness duration upon wakening. The participant was asked to mark the box with an X on a 0 to 10 unit NRS for each of the 6 questions. To give each of the five symptoms equal weighting, the mean of the two scores relating to morning stiffness was taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score was divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI score. A BASDAI score of 4 or greater was considered to be indicative of active AS disease.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline and Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20 (ASAS) Response at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
ASAS 20 was defined as achieving an improvement from baseline of = 20% and = 1 unit in at least 3 of 4 ASAS domains on a scale of 0 to 10 units and no worsening from baseline of = 20% and = 1 unit in the remaining ASAS domain on a scale of 0 to 10 units. The 4 ASAS domains are:
1. Patient Global Assessment of Disease (0 - 10 unit Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\]); participant marks a box with an X on a 0 - 10 unit NRS; the left-hand box of 0 = not active and the right-hand box = very active
2. Total Back Pain (0 to 10 unit NRS); participant marks a box with an X on a 0 - 10 unit NRS; the left-hand box of 0 = "no pain" and the right-hand box = "most severe pain"
3. Function (Bath AS Functional Index \[BASFI\] NRS 0 - 10 unit); participant provides a self-administered survey of 10 questions assessing for degree of mobility and functional ability
4. Inflammation domain is determined by the mean of 2 Bath AS Disease Activity Index NRS Questions #5 and #6 for morning stiffness) (0 - 10 unit)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline and Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Summary Score at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The ASQoL is a validated disease specific patient reported outcomes instrument to assess the impact of ankylosing spondylitis on the quality of life of individuals with emphasis on the ability of the person to fulfill his or her needs. It consisted of 18 items requesting a yes (score=1) or no (score=0) response to questions related to the impact of pain on sleep, mood, motivation, ability to cope, activities of daily living, independence, relationships, and social life. The summary score ranges 0-18 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline and Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) was a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores (based on US general population with mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10) were used in analyses. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The PCS encompasses physical functioning, role-physical, and bodily pain, as well as general health and vitality. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline and Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index-Linear (BASMI-Linear) at Week 24
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The BASMI-Linear was designed to assess axial status (ie, cervical, dorsal and lumbar spine, hips, and pelvic soft tissue) and to define clinically significant changes in spinal movement. Five dimensions of movement (lateral lumbar flexion, tragus to wall, forward lumbar flexion, maximal intermalleolar distance, and cervical rotation) were measured and normalized on 0 to 10 unit NRS. The average of these scores was the total BASMI score, ranging from 0-10 with higher values indicating more severe limitation in spinal mobility.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline and Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Radiographic Score Using the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (m-SASSS) at Week 104 and Week 260
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score is a scoring method used to determine the amount or degree of ankylosing spondylitis disease that is in the spine based on x-ray radiographs of the spine. The m-SASSS scores 0-3.
0 = No abnormality, 1 = Erosion, Sclerosis or Squaring, 2 = Syndesmophyte, 3 = Total bony Bridging at each Site. An increase in the m-SASSS indicated a worsening of AS disease.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline to Week 104 and 260
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo Controlled Phase
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
A TEAE was an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of IP and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP for participants who discontinued early. A serious AE = results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed based on the following scale: Mild = asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only; Moderate = symptoms cause moderate discomfort; Severe = symptoms causing severe pain discomfort.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From Week 0 to Week 24; the median duration of exposure was 23.57 weeks for the placebo arm, 23.71 weeks for the apremilast 20 mg arm and 24.00 weeks for the apremilast 30 mg arm.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Apremilast Exposure Period
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
A TEAE was an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of IP and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP for participants who discontinued early. A serious AE = results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs was assessed based on the following scale: Mild = asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only; Moderate = symptoms cause moderate discomfort; Severe = symptoms causing severe pain discomfort.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Week 0 to week 260; overall mean duration of exposure to apremilast 20 mg and 30 mg BID was 160.96 weeks
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Must have a documented diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis as defined by low back pain and stiffness, which improves with exercise, but is not relieved by rest for more than 3 months prior to screening. At the completion of screening procedures, a documented diagnosis of definite active AS, as defined by the modified New York criteria (1984) whereby both criteria, at least 1 radiographic criterion and at least 1 clinical criterion, must be met
* Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) is = 4
* Total back pain is = 4
* On stable dose of AS medication (or lack of medication) prior to randomization and through week 24
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Prior treatment with a Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) blocker and any biologic treatment for AS
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
2/05/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/10/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
490
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
TAS,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Southern Clinical Research - Hobart
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Emeritus Research - Camberwell
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Coastal Joint Care - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Royal Perth Hospital - Perth
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
7000 - Hobart
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3124 - Camberwell
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4558 - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
6849 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
5011 - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Pleven
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Varna
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Newfoundland and Labrador
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Hostivice
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Pardubice
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Praha 11
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Praha 4
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Praha
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Sokolov
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Zlin
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Estonia
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Tallinn
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Estonia
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Tartu
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Boulogne
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Créteil
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Orléans Cedex 2
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Frankfurt
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Heidelberg
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Herne
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Kistarcsa
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Veszprém
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Leiden
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Maastricht
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Bialystok
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Bydgoszcz
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Gdynia
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Lublin
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Torun
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Braila
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Bucharest
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Cluj-Napoca
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Galati
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Iasi
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Ekaterinburg
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Kazan
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Kemerovo
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Nizhniy Novgorod
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Smolensk
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Vladimir
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Piestany
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Poprad
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
A Coruña
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Sabadell
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Santiago de Compostela
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Malmö
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Barnsley
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Bath
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Leeds
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Oxford
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Amgen
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Apremilast is a new, orally available, small molecule drug that specifically inhibits phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), an enzyme that modulates inflammatory cytokines. This clinical study tests whether apremilast can improve the signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01583374
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Gladman DD, Kavanaugh A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Wollenhaupt J, Cutolo M, Schett G, Lespessailles E, Guerette B, Delev N, Teng L, Edwards CJ, Birbara CA, Mease PJ. Therapeutic benefit of apremilast on enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis of the PALACE 1-3 studies. RMD Open. 2018 Jun 27;4(1):e000669. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000669. eCollection 2018. Kavanaugh A, Gladman DD, Edwards CJ, Schett G, Guerette B, Delev N, Teng L, Paris M, Mease PJ. Long-term experience with apremilast in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 5-year results from a PALACE 1-3 pooled analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 10;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1901-3. Taylor PC, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, McCue S, Cheng S, Boonen A. A Phase III Randomized Study of Apremilast, an Oral Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor, for Active Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2021 Aug;48(8):1259-1267. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.201088. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
MD
Query!
Address
0
0
Amgen
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Informed consent form (ICF), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
Query!
Available to whom?
Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors. If not approved, a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel will arbitrate and make the final decision. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: http://www.amgen.com/datasharing
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01583374