Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01602341
Registration number
NCT01602341
Ethics application status
Date submitted
17/05/2012
Date registered
21/05/2012
Date last updated
6/03/2017
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and Safety of AN2728 Topical Ointment to Treat Adolescents With Atopic Dermatitis
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Four-Week, Bilateral Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Concentrations of AN2728 Ointment Administered Once or Twice a Day in Adolescents With Atopic Dermatitis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
AN2728-AD-204
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Dermatitis, Atopic
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Dermatological conditions
Query!
Skin
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other skin conditions
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% QD
Treatment: Drugs - AN2728 Topical Ointment, 0.5% QD
Treatment: Drugs - AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% BID
Treatment: Drugs - AN2728 Topical Ointment, 0.5% BID
Experimental: AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% QD vs 0.5% QD - AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% applied once daily for 29 days to a target lesion, and AN2728 Topical Ointment, 0.5% applied once daily for 29 days to a target lesion
Treatments will be randomly assigned to target lesions A and B.
Experimental: AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% BID vs 0.5% BID - AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% applied twice daily for 29 days to a target lesion, and AN2728 Topical Ointment, 0.5% applied twice daily for 29 days to a target lesion.
Treatments will be randomly assigned to target lesions A and B.
Treatment: Drugs: AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% QD
AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% QD
Treatment: Drugs: AN2728 Topical Ointment, 0.5% QD
AN2728 Topical Ointment, 0.5% QD
Treatment: Drugs: AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% BID
AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% BID
Treatment: Drugs: AN2728 Topical Ointment, 0.5% BID
AN2728 Topical Ointment, 0.5% BID
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Improvement From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) Score at Day 8
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ADSI was used to assess the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) based on five subscale scores of erythema, pruritus, exudation, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity of each subscale was measured on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), where higher scores indicating more severity. ADSI was calculated as the sum of these 5 subscale scores with a total possible score range of 0 (none) to 15 (most severe) where, higher scores indicating more severity. Improvement from Baseline was calculated as Baseline score minus follow-up score.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, Day 8
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Improvement From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) Score at Day 15
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
ADSI was used to assess the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) based on five subscale scores of erythema, pruritus, exudation, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity of each subscale was measured on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), where higher scores indicating more severity. ADSI was calculated as the sum of these 5 subscale scores with a total possible score range of 0 (none) to 15 (most severe) where, higher scores indicating more severity. Improvement from Baseline was calculated as Baseline score minus follow-up score.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, Day 15
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Improvement From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) Score at Day 22
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
ADSI was used to assess the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) based on five subscale scores of erythema, pruritus, exudation, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity of each subscale was measured on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), where higher scores indicating more severity. ADSI was calculated as the sum of these 5 subscale scores with a total possible score range of 0 (none) to 15 (most severe) where, higher scores indicating more severity. Improvement from Baseline was calculated as Baseline score minus follow-up score.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline, Day 22
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Improvement From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) Score at Day 29
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
ADSI was used to assess the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) based on five subscale scores of erythema, pruritus, exudation, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity of each subscale was measured on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), where higher scores indicating more severity. ADSI was calculated as the sum of these 5 subscale scores with a total possible score range of 0 (none) to 15 (most severe) where, higher scores indicating more severity. Improvement from Baseline was calculated as Baseline score minus follow-up score.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline, Day 29
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Vital signs (temperature, respiratory rate, pulse, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Clinical significance of vital signs was determined at the investigator's discretion.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline up to Day 29
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Abnormalities
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Laboratory parameters included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, platelet and white blood cell count, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes), chemistry (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, sodium, potassium, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, total protein and serum pregnancy test \[for all female participants\]) and urine (urine pregnancy test \[for all female participants\]). Clinical significance of laboratory parameters was determined at the investigator's discretion.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline up to Day 29
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; Initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug to the end of study treatment (Day 29), that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline up to Day 29
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events By Severity
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed on basis of severity as follows: mild=does not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate=interferes to some extent with participant's usual function; severe=interferes significantly with participant's usual function. Number of participants with mild, moderate and severe treatment-emergent AEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline up to Day 29
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Participants With Local Tolerability Symptoms
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Participants who experienced local tolerability symptoms: mild itching or burning/stinging at sites of study drug application were reported in this measure.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline up to Day 29
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Improvement From Baseline in ADSI Component Scores (Erythema, Pruritus, Exudation, Excoriation and Lichenification) at Day 8, 15, 22 and 29
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
ADSI was used to assess the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) based on five subscale scores of erythema, pruritus, exudation, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity of each subscale was measured on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), where higher scores indicating more severity. ADSI was calculated as the sum of these 5 subscale scores with a total possible score range of 0 (none) to 15 (most severe) where, higher scores indicating more severity. Improvement from baseline was calculated as baseline evaluation minus the follow-up evaluation.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, Day 8, 15, 22, 29
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Male or female 12 to 17 years of age, inclusive
* Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (according to the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka)
* Total body surface area (BSA) of atopic dermatitis involvement =35%
* Presence of two comparable target lesions
* Willing and able to comply with study instructions and commit to attending all visits
* Females of childbearing potential must use a highly effective method of birth control. Males with partners of childbearing potential should inform them of their participation in this clinical study and use a highly effective method of birth control during the study.
* Parent/guardian has the ability to understand, agree to and sign the study Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to initiation of any protocol-related procedures; subject has the ability to give assent
Query!
Minimum age
12
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
17
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Significant confounding conditions as assessed by study doctor
* Unstable or actively infected AD
* Active or potentially recurrent dermatologic condition other than atopic dermatitis in the target lesion area that may confound evaluation
* History or evidence of allergies requiring acute or chronic treatment (except seasonal allergic rhinitis)
* Concurrent or recent use of certain topical or systemic medications or phototherapy without a sufficient washout period
* Treatment for any type of cancer (except squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, or carcinoma in situ of the skin, curatively treated with cryosurgery or surgical excision only) within the last 5 years
* Current pregnancy or lactation, or intent to become pregnant during the study
* Known sensitivity to any of the components of the study drug
* Participated in any other trial of an investigational drug or device within 30 days or participation in a research study concurrent with this study
* Participated in a previous AN2728 clinical study
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/08/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2013
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
86
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,QLD,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Anacor Investigational Site - Phillip
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Anacor Investigational Site - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Anacor Investigational Site - Wooloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Anacor Investigational Site - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Anacor Investigational Site - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Anacor Investigational Site - Fremantle
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2606 - Phillip
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Wooloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
6160 - Fremantle
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Pfizer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of AN2728 Topical Ointment, 2% and 0.5%, administered once a day (QD) or twice a day (BID), in the treatment of adolescents with atopic dermatitis (AD)
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01602341
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Query!
Address
0
0
Pfizer
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01602341
Download to PDF