Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01668784
Registration number
NCT01668784
Ethics application status
Date submitted
16/08/2012
Date registered
20/08/2012
Date last updated
9/08/2022
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Pre-Treated Advanced or Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (CheckMate 025)
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Received Prior Anti-Angiogenic Therapy
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2011-005132-26
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CA209-025
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Non melanoma skin cancer
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Kidney
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional(has expanded access)
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: Arm 1: Nivolumab - Nivolumab 3 mg/kg solution intravenously every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends
Active comparator: Arm 2: Everolimus - Everolimus 10 mg tablets by mouth daily until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p \< 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Randomization until 398 deaths, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ORR is defined as Percentage of participants with a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by number of randomized participants. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Tumor assessments began at 8 weeks following randomization and continued every 8 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death. CIs used Clopper and Pearson.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Duration of objective response is defined as the time from study start date to response, CR or partial response, PR) to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by the investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For participants who neither progress nor die, the duration of objective response were censored at the same time they were censored for the primary definition. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From randomization to date of disease progression or death or censoring if no progression or death occurred (approximately 105 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Investigator-assessed Time to Objective Response
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Time to objective response is defined as the time from randomization to first response (complete response, CR or partial response, PR). CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Randomization to date of first response (approximately 105 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
PFS=time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression as determined by investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without subsequent anti-cancer therapy were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessments and did not die were censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who received any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation date of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Progressive disease: \>=20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters and sum must show absolute increase of \>=5mm; smallest sum on study as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Quantifiable PD-L1 expression=percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified it was classified as: indeterminate=tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to biology of tumor biopsy specimen and not due to improper sample preparation or handling; not evaluable=tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared. Not evaluable determined from H\&E process before the tumor biopsy specimen was sent for evaluation or from H\&E process during PD-L1 evaluation; baseline PD-L1 expression=if more than one tumor biopsy specimen was available, the most recently collected specimen with a quantifiable result. If all specimens for a given participant are either indeterminate or not evaluable, then the PD-L1 expression was considered indeterminate as long as at least one specimen is indeterminate. Otherwise, PD-L1 expression was considered not evaluable.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Randomization to date of death or date of last contact for patients without documentation of death, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Adverse event (AE) defined: any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) defined: a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Day of first dose to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Disease-related symptom progression rate (DRSPR)=a decrease of two points in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index - Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaire relative to the participant's baseline FKSI-DRS score with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. The 9 items of the FKSI-DRS were summarized into a symptom scale ranging in score from 0 to 36, with 0 being the worst possible score and 36 being the best possible score. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered disease-related symptom progression only if it was the last one available for the participant. In order to consider a questionnaire received as valid, over 50% of the items were to be completed. Calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method for each treatment group.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Aspartate aminotransferase, AST. Alanine aminotransaminase, ALT. Total bilirubin, tBIL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, TSH. Upper limit of normal (ULN). Units per Liter (U/L). Results reported in International System of Units (SI).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) version 4.0 in International System of Units (SI); Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling. Hematology parameters=Hemoglobin (Gr 3: \< 8.0 g/dL), Platelet Count (Gr 3: 25.0 -\< 50.0\*10\^9 c/L; Gr 4: \< 25.0\*10\^9 c/L), Leukocyte Count (Gr 3: 1.0 -\< 2.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr4: \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Lymphocyte Count (Gr 3: 0.2 -\< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.2\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Neutrophil Count (Gr 3: 0.5 - \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL). Liver Function parameters=Alkaline Phosphatase (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), AST (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), ALT (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), tBIL (Gr 3: \> 3.0 - 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN). Renal parameter=Creatinine (Grade: Gr3: \> 3.0 - 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN; Gr4: \> 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN). Cells per microliter (c/µL). Cells per Liter (c/L). Grams per deciliter (g/dL). Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Men & women =18 years of age
* Histologic confirmation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear-cell component
* Advanced/metastatic RCC
* Measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria
* Received 1 or 2 prior anti-angiogenic therapy regimens in advanced or metastatic setting
* No more than 3 total prior systemic treatment regimens in the advanced or metastatic setting, and evidence of progression on or after last treatment regimen received and within 6 months of enrollment
* Karnofsky Performance Score =70%
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Any Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases or history of CNS metastases
* Prior therapy with an Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor
* Any active known or suspected autoimmune disease
* Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency
* Active chronic liver disease
* Prior malignancy active within past 3 years, except for locally curable cancers
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
9/10/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/07/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
821
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,SA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Local Institution - 0095 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Local Institution - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Local Institution - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Local Institution - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Local Institution - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
5011 - Woodville South
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3128 - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Tucuman
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Linz
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
RIO Grande DO SUL
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
New Brunswick
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Nova Scotia
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Montreal
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Olomouc
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Prague 5
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Aarhus N
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Herlev
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Odense
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Helsinki
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Lorraine
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Bordeaux
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Lyon Cedex
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Marseille Cedex 9
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Poitiers
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Saint Herblain Cedex
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Toulouse Cedex 9
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Vandoeuvre Les Nancy
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Villejuif Cedex
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Aachen
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Hannover
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Heidelberg
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Munich
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Tuebingen
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Thessaloniki
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Dublin
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Haifa
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Petah Tikva
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Ramat-gan
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Tel Aviv
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Arezzo
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Meldola (fc)
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Rimini
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Rozzano
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Siena
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Terni
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Akita
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Chiba
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Iwate
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Kyoto
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Shizuoka
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Tokushima
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Yamagata
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Kobe-city, Hyogo
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Kumamoto
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Bergen
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Lorenskog
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Rybnik
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Bucharest
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Craiova
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Iasi
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Timisoara
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
St Petersburg
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Navarra
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Hospitalet De Llobregat
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Gothenberg
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Solna
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Cambridgeshire
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Carmarthenshire
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Greater London
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical benefit, as measured by duration of overall survival, of Nivolumab vs. Everolimus in subjects with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01668784
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Klijn SL, Fenwick E, Kroep S, Johannesen K, Malcolm B, Kurt M, Kiff C, Borrill J. What Did Time Tell Us? A Comparison and Retrospective Validation of Different Survival Extrapolation Methods for Immuno-Oncologic Therapy in Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Mar;39(3):345-356. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00989-1. Epub 2021 Jan 11. Ambavane A, Yang S, Atkins MB, Rao S, Shah A, Regan MM, McDermott DF, Michaelson MD. Clinical and economic outcomes of treatment sequences for intermediate- to poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma. Immunotherapy. 2020 Jan;12(1):37-51. doi: 10.2217/imt-2019-0199. Epub 2020 Jan 29. Shah R, Botteman M, Solem CT, Luo L, Doan J, Cella D, Motzer RJ. A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC). Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):356-365.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 31. Long GV, Tykodi SS, Schneider JG, Garbe C, Gravis G, Rashford M, Agrawal S, Grigoryeva E, Bello A, Roy A, Rollin L, Zhao X. Assessment of nivolumab exposure and clinical safety of 480 mg every 4 weeks flat-dosing schedule in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2208-2213. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy408. Escudier B, Motzer RJ, Sharma P, Wagstaff J, Plimack ER, Hammers HJ, Donskov F, Gurney H, Sosman JA, Zalewski PG, Harmenberg U, McDermott DF, Choueiri TK, Richardet M, Tomita Y, Ravaud A, Doan J, Zhao H, Hardy H, George S. Treatment Beyond Progression in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab in CheckMate 025. Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):368-376. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Apr 12. Escudier B, Sharma P, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Gurney H, Donskov F, Peltola K, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Zhao H, Waxman IM, Motzer RJ; CheckMate 025 investigators. CheckMate 025 Randomized Phase 3 Study: Outcomes by Key Baseline Factors and Prior Therapy for Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):962-971. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 3. Erratum In: Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):e116-e118. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.016. Cella D, Grunwald V, Nathan P, Doan J, Dastani H, Taylor F, Bennett B, DeRosa M, Berry S, Broglio K, Berghorn E, Motzer RJ. Quality of life in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma given nivolumab versus everolimus in CheckMate 025: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):994-1003. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30125-5. Epub 2016 Jun 6. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):e270. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30232-7. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Choueiri TK, Gurney H, Donskov F, Bono P, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Tomita Y, Schutz FA, Kollmannsberger C, Larkin J, Ravaud A, Simon JS, Xu LA, Waxman IM, Sharma P; CheckMate 025 Investigators. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Address
0
0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01668784
Download to PDF