Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612000426886
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
13/04/2012
Date registered
16/04/2012
Date last updated
28/08/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A randomised controlled trial of Strain-Counterstrain
treatment for people with neck pain selected using a
treatment based classification system
Query!
Scientific title
A randomised controlled trial of Strain-Counterstrain
treatment for people with neck pain selected using a
treatment based classification system with the Neck Disability Index as primary outcome measure
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
280321
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U111-1129-9316
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Non-specific acute neck pain
286285
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
286517
286517
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Strain-Counterstrain treatment treatment will involve passive positioning of the participant, with varying degrees of cervical flexion/extension, lateral flexion and rotation, such that there is a two-thirds reduction in tenderness at a monitored digitally tender point (Jones et al 1995). This is to be determined by having participants rate their tenderness to palpation at digitally tender points on a numerical pain scale where 10 represented initial tenderness and 0 no tenderness. In addition to reported tenderness with intermittent digital probing, perceived tissue tension will be used to guide the experimenter to the appropriate passive position (Jones et al 1995). The participant will be passively maintained at this point by the experimenter for approximately 90 seconds, with intermittent digital probing at 30-sec intervals to ensure correct positioning, before being slowly and passively returned to a neutral position (Jones et al 1995, Kusunose and Wendorff 1990, Kusunose 1993). Treatment using a digitally tender point will be considered successful if tenderness is reduced by 70% or more (3/10 or less with digital probing) (Kusunose 1993, Kusunose and Wendorff 1990), however the intention will be to reduce tenderness to a numerical pain rating of 1/10 or less with digital probing. This treatment is to be provided in two half hour sessions in a one week period.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
284675
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Placebo Strain-Counterstrain treatment is to be the same as Strain-Counterstrain treatment except, that once the appropriate passive position is reached, the participant will be passively, deliberately and significantly moved out of this position. Intermittent digital probing of the digital tender point will not be performed since this has been shown to significantly reduce tenderness at digitally tender points identified using Strain-Counterstrain procedures (Lewis et al 2010). This intervention is to be provided in two half hour sessions in a one week period.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
286947
0
Neck Disability Index
Query!
Assessment method [1]
286947
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
286947
0
Initial assessment, 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
297040
0
SF-36 health questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [1]
297040
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
297040
0
Initial assessment, 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
297041
0
Visual analogue scale for pain rating
Query!
Assessment method [2]
297041
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
297041
0
Initial assessment, 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
297042
0
Global rating of change
Query!
Assessment method [3]
297042
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
297042
0
1 week
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
297043
0
Fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [4]
297043
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
297043
0
Initial assessment
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1) Neck pain (Merskey and Bogduk 1994) of less than 30 days duration
2) Between 18 and 60 years
3) Initial VAS pain rating less than 7/10
4) Initial neck disability index score between 20 and 52
5) Able to lie supine for 10 minutes
6) Displaying a minimum of four digitally tender points at examined sites (Kusunose and Wendorff 1990) at their initial assessment.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1) Whiplash mechanism of injury
2) Signs of nerve root compression
3) Symptoms distal to the elbow
4) Chief complaint of headaches with neck pain
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Participants will be referred by public and private medical practitioners for treatment of neck pain or will be recruited through posted notices and advertisement in local papers. Randomised group allocation will be achieved by consecutively- numbered sealed opaque envelopes containing randomly generated numbers, prepared by an independent investigator.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
A computer is to be used to provide randomly generated numbers. These will be placed in consecutively numbered envelopes.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/08/2012
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
85
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
285094
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
285094
0
Cynan Lewis
Query!
Address [1]
285094
0
PO Box 273
Stanthorpe
Qld 4380
Query!
Country [1]
285094
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Stanthorpe Health Services
Query!
Address
8 McGregor Terrace
Stanthorpe
Qld 4380
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
283954
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
283954
0
Query!
Address [1]
283954
0
Query!
Country [1]
283954
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
260732
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
260732
0
Professor Michele Sterling
Query!
Address [1]
260732
0
Edith Cavell Building
RBWH
Herston
Qld 4209
Query!
Country [1]
260732
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
287105
0
HREC Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
287105
0
HREC Coordinator The Undercroft Mount Lofty Heights Nursing Home Cnr Stuart St and Rifle Range Road MOUNT LOFTY QLD 4350
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
287105
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
287105
0
10/05/2012
Query!
Approval date [1]
287105
0
25/07/2012
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
287105
0
(EC00182)
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Question: Is Strain-Counterstrain treatment (manual therapy treatment using passive positioning) more effective than sham Strain-Counterstrain intervention in reducing levels of pain and disability in people with neck pain selected using a treatment-based classification system? Design: Randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: 85 participants (male and female) between 18 and 60 years experiencing non-specific neck pain for less than 30 days. Intervention: Participants are to attend two treatments in a week. The experimental group is to receive Strain-Counterstrain treatment and the control group sham Strain-Counterstrain intervention. Following the initial intervention period, participants are to receive standard Physiotherapy treatment for neck pain for up to 6 weeks. Outcome measures: The primary outcome is to be the Neck disability questionnaire, measured at 1 week (ie, end of initial intervention), 6 weeks, and 28 weeks. Secondary outcome measures are to include the Fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire, SF-36, visual analogue scale pain ratings and a 7-point global rating of change.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34062
0
Query!
Address
34062
0
Query!
Country
34062
0
Query!
Phone
34062
0
Query!
Fax
34062
0
Query!
Email
34062
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
17309
0
Cynan Lewis
Query!
Address
17309
0
PO Box 273
Stanthorpe
Qld 4380
Query!
Country
17309
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
17309
0
+61 7 46815250
Query!
Fax
17309
0
Query!
Email
17309
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
8237
0
Cynan Lewis
Query!
Address
8237
0
PO Box 273
Stanthorpe
Qld 4380
Query!
Country
8237
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
8237
0
+61 7 46815250
Query!
Fax
8237
0
Query!
Email
8237
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF