Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612000545864
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/05/2012
Date registered
22/05/2012
Date last updated
25/12/2012
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on the pain after subtotal gastrectomy
Query!
Scientific title
In patients undergoing subtotal gastrectomy, is intravenous lidocaine infusion effective in reducing post-operative pain?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
280535
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
pain following subtotal gastrectomy
286531
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
286796
286796
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
286797
286797
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusion:group: IV administration of 1mg/ml lidocaine was performed 2 minute before orotracheal intubation. Patients in arm1 received an IV bolus injection of lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) followed by a continuous IV infusion of lidocaine at 2 mg/kg/hr during the operation (150-180 min).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
284910
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control group: patients in control group received an intravenous bolus injection of normal saline (1.5 ml/kg) followed by a continuous IV infusion of saline at 2 ml/kg/hr during the operation (150-180 min).
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
287169
0
Pain score assessed using 100 point-visual analogue scale
Query!
Assessment method [1]
287169
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
287169
0
at 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 24hr, 48hr postoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
297547
0
Frequency to push the button of patient controlled analgesia machine recorded by computerized patient controlled analgesia machine
Query!
Assessment method [1]
297547
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
297547
0
at 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 24hr, 48hr postoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
297548
0
fentanyl consumption recorded by nurse
Query!
Assessment method [2]
297548
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
297548
0
at 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 24hr, 48hr postoperatively
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
patients undergoing subtotal gastrectomy
Query!
Minimum age
20
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
body weight lower than 45 kg or greater than 100 kg, history of severe underlying cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal or hepatic disease, or allergy to local anaesthetics
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The details of the series are kept in a set of sealed envelopes, each bearing only the case number on the outside. After admitting into the operating room and just before the induction of anaesthesia, the numbered envelope was opened and the card inside determined which group the patient would be affiliated to.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomization into one of the two groups was based on Excel random-number generation.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2012
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
4328
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
State/province [1]
4328
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
285296
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
285296
0
Chung-Ang University
Query!
Address [1]
285296
0
224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul, 156-755
Query!
Country [1]
285296
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Chung-Ang University
Query!
Address
224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul, 156-755
Query!
Country
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
284156
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
284156
0
Query!
Address [1]
284156
0
Query!
Country [1]
284156
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
287306
0
Institutional Board of Chung-Ang University School of Medicine
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
287306
0
Chung-Ang University College of Medicine 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul, 156-755, Korea
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
287306
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
287306
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
287306
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
287306
0
C2010074(369)
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Intravenous lidocaine infusion in various type of surgery is known to effective in reducing post-operative pain, analgesic requirements, the stress response and lengthens the period to first post-operative analgesic requirement. We hypothesized that intravenous lidocaine infusion reduce the pain after subtotal gastrectomy. Therefore we performed a study to investigate the effectiveness of lidocaine on pain after subtotal gastrectomy .
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34213
0
Query!
Address
34213
0
Query!
Country
34213
0
Query!
Phone
34213
0
Query!
Fax
34213
0
Query!
Email
34213
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
17460
0
Hyun Kang
Query!
Address
17460
0
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine Chung-Ang University College of Medicine 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul, 156-755, Korea
Query!
Country
17460
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Phone
17460
0
+82-2-6299-2571, 2579, 2586
Query!
Fax
17460
0
+82-2-6299-2585
Query!
Email
17460
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
8388
0
Hyun Kang
Query!
Address
8388
0
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine Chung-Ang University College of Medicine 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul, 156-755, Korea
Query!
Country
8388
0
Korea, Republic Of
Query!
Phone
8388
0
+82-2-6299-2571, 2579, 2586
Query!
Fax
8388
0
+82-2-6299-2585
Query!
Email
8388
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Dimensions AI
Intraoperative systemic lidocaine for pre-emptive analgesics in subtotal gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
2014
https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.009613
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF