Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12612001060831
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
28/09/2012
Date registered
4/10/2012
Date last updated
22/10/2012
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Treadmill Training in Infants At-Risk for Neuromotor Delay
Query!
Scientific title
Infants at risk for neurodevelopmental delay with and without treadmill training: frequency of alternating steps and toe contacts
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
281243
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1134-8321
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Infant born with low birth weight (<1500g).
287491
0
Query!
Periventricular leukomalacia.
287494
0
Query!
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
287495
0
Query!
Neonatal seizures.
287496
0
Query!
Neurodevelopmental delay.
287560
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
287822
287822
0
0
Query!
Physiotherapy
Query!
Neurological
287884
287884
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treadmill training; frequency: 5 days/week; duration: 8 minutes/session; belt speed: 0.2m/s.
The intervention started when infants were able to produce 10 supported steps on a treadmill within 1 minute trial (as long as it happened before turning 13 months corrected age, if they were to be included in this study). Treadmill training continued until the infant was observed walking 3 independent steps over ground, or the infant turned 24 months corrected age.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
285756
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
285757
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The control group did not receive treadmill training. All families were visited on a monthly basis to videotape five 1-minute trials of the infants stepping while being supported on a treadmill.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
288044
0
Primary outcome 1: Age of onset of independent walking.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
288044
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
288044
0
Timepoint: whenever families reported their infants being able to take 3 steps over ground.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
288045
0
Primary outcome 2: percent of alternating steps.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
288045
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
288045
0
Timepoint: monthly from starting the training or entering the study until walking onset (termination of intervention), and 6 months follow-up for gait analysis.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
288046
0
Primary outcome 3: percent of toe contact (Video analysis of foot placement at the initiation of the stance phase in the treadmill step).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
288046
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
288046
0
Timepoint: monthly from starting the training or entering the study until walking onset (termination of intervention), and 6 months follow-up for gait analysis.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
299331
0
Secondary outcome 1: Gross Motor Function Measure
Query!
Assessment method [1]
299331
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
299331
0
Timepoint: Termination of the intervention: when the infant was observed walking 3 independent steps over ground. Same timepoint for the control group.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
299379
0
Secondary outcome 2: Motor development (Bayley motor)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
299379
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
299379
0
Timepoint: Termination of the intervention: when the infant was observed walking 3 independent steps over ground. Same timepoint for the control group.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
299380
0
Secondary outcome 3: Cognitive development (Bayley mental)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
299380
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
299380
0
Timepoint: Termination of the intervention: when the infant was observed walking 3 independent steps over ground. Same timepoint for the control group.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
299381
0
Secondary outcome 4: Spasticity (Ashworth)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
299381
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
299381
0
Timepoint: Termination of the intervention: when the infant was observed walking 3 independent steps over ground. Same timepoint for the control group.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Mild to moderate hypo/hypertonia or developmental delay when examined by their pediatrician; no congenital musculoskeletal deficits or other genetic disorders.
Query!
Minimum age
6
Months
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
13
Months
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Severe hypo/hypertonia, genetic disorders such as spina bifida or Down syndrome, and genetic musculoskeletal deficits.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Recruitment via high risk clinics of local hospital, doctors referred potential subjects, and after checking exclusion/inclusion criteria, the assigned ID was entreted into a computer program for group allocation by a statistician unaware to which group the subject would be allocated (central randomisation)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation was conducted via a computer program considering 3 stratification factors: age, gender, birth weight
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
18/10/2004
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
4560
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
4560
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
286075
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
286075
0
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services
Query!
Address [1]
286075
0
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washinghton, D.C. 20202-2575
Query!
Country [1]
286075
0
United States of America
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Michigan University
Query!
Address
401 Washtenaw Ave
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Query!
Country
United States of America
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
284891
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
284891
0
University of Barcelona - INEFC
Query!
Address [1]
284891
0
Avda de l'Estadi 12-22
08038 Barcelona
Query!
Country [1]
284891
0
Spain
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
288103
0
Institutional Review Board, University of Michigan Medical Center
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
288103
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
288103
0
United States of America
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
288103
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
288103
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
288103
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to examine the potential benefits of treadmill training in infants who are at risk of having delays related to their movement development. In addition, previous research has suggested that there might be a relationship between how infants perform their steps on the treadmill and the age of onset of independent walking. Therefore, this has also been explored. Hypotheses: treadmill training in infants at risk for developmental delays may: a) lead to earlier onset of walking; b) increase the number of steps taken per minute; and c) improve correct foot positioning during stepping relative to an untrained control group.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
34721
0
Query!
Address
34721
0
Query!
Country
34721
0
Query!
Phone
34721
0
Query!
Fax
34721
0
Query!
Email
34721
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
17968
0
Rosa Angulo-Barroso
Query!
Address
17968
0
Department of Health and Applied Sciences
INEFC, University of Barcelona
Ave de L'Estadi 12-22
08038 Barcelona
Query!
Country
17968
0
Spain
Query!
Phone
17968
0
+34 93 4255445
Query!
Fax
17968
0
+34 93 4263617
Query!
Email
17968
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
8896
0
Rosa Angulo-Barroso
Query!
Address
8896
0
Department of Health and Applied Sciences
INEFC, University of Barcelona
Ave de L'Estadi 12-22
08038 Barcelona
Query!
Country
8896
0
Spain
Query!
Phone
8896
0
+34 93 4255445
Query!
Fax
8896
0
Query!
Email
8896
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF