Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000141741
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
31/01/2013
Date registered
6/02/2013
Date last updated
19/07/2018
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Feasibility and safety of a new device (Odon device) for assisted vaginal deliveries
Query!
Scientific title
In pregnant women, is the use of the Odon device during the second stage of labour feasible and safe for maternal and perinatal outcomes?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
281873
0
A65711
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Nil
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Prolonged second stage of labour
288255
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
288607
288607
0
0
Query!
Fetal medicine and complications of pregnancy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
New device (Odon Device) to deliver the fetus. The Odon device is technological innovation to facilitate operative vaginal delivery. The Odon Device is made of two main components: a plastic sleeve and an inserter. The sleeve is made of flexible polyethylene, with an internal fold in contact with the fetal head and the external fold in contact with the vaginal wall.. The inserter consists of a handle with four pronged flexible spatulas that slide around the fetal head and help to position the sleeve
The device will be applied to women without labour complications under non-emergency/normal delivery conditions. The device is applied on second stage of labour (i.e. cervix fully dilated) and on a station level equivalent to 2 cm or more below the spines.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
286434
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No comparator is used. The device was tested for safety and feasibility in terms of ease of application and successful delivery under non-emergency/normal delivery conditions
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
288758
0
Primary outcome 1: Time from application of device to delivery of the cephalic pole.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
288758
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
288758
0
During labour and delivery
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
288759
0
Primary outcome 2: Failure rate of device application (only one attempt will be made)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
288759
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
288759
0
During labour and delivery
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
288760
0
Primary outcome 3: Incidence of: (i) Operative delivery with forceps or vacuum; (ii) caesarean section
Query!
Assessment method [3]
288760
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
288760
0
During labour and delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
300917
0
Time taken to apply the device (in seconds; from the start to the removal of the inserter)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300917
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300917
0
During labour
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
300959
0
Successful application and inflation
Query!
Assessment method [2]
300959
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
300959
0
During labour
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
300960
0
Any slipping of the device
Query!
Assessment method [3]
300960
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
300960
0
During labour
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
300961
0
Number of contractions after application
Query!
Assessment method [4]
300961
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
300961
0
During labour
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
300962
0
Integrity of the air chamber after expulsion. Assessment method: Once the device has been used and before discarding it, it is checked for integrity. The integrity of the air chamber is examine by pumping air into the chamber again and testing that there is not an air leak.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
300962
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
300962
0
After delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
300963
0
Incidence of episiotomy
Query!
Assessment method [6]
300963
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
300963
0
During delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
300964
0
Incidence of perineal lacerations including cervical laceration and incidence of third or fourth degree perineal tear
Query!
Assessment method [7]
300964
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
300964
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
300965
0
Incidence of uterine rupture
Query!
Assessment method [8]
300965
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
300965
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
300966
0
Incidence of pelvic, perineal or vaginal hematoma
Query!
Assessment method [9]
300966
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
300966
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
300967
0
Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage as routinely monitored at the centers
Query!
Assessment method [10]
300967
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
300967
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
300968
0
Incidence of postpartum endometritis or infection as routinely monitored at the centers
Query!
Assessment method [11]
300968
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
300968
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
300969
0
Incidence of maternal blood transfusion
Query!
Assessment method [12]
300969
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
300969
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
300970
0
Maternal pain during insertion of the device measured by a standardized questionnaire. Assessment method: The Visual Analoge Scale (VAS) will be used (from 0 to 10). Reference: Leeman L, Fullilove AM, Borders N, Manocchio R, Albers LL, Rogers RG.(2009) Postpartum perineal pain in a low episiotomy setting: association with severity of genital trauma, labor care, and birth variables. Birth. Dec;36(4):283-8.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
300970
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
300970
0
At time of device application
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
300971
0
Maternal satisfaction measured by a standardized questionnaire. Assessment method: Three closed questions were developed to assess maternal satisfaction with: (i) How do you feel about the information received on the Odon Device?; (ii) Are you satisfied with the Odon Device application? (iii) Do you think you might want to apply the Odon device again if you have another delivery?
Query!
Assessment method [14]
300971
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
300971
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
300972
0
Newborn respiratory rate at 3 or 6 hours. Assessment: By counting the number of breaths in one minute (by counting how many times the chest rises). It will be measured 3 hours after birth but if this couldn't be done, it will be measure at hour 6.
Query!
Assessment method [15]
300972
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
300972
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
300973
0
Incidence of birth trauma or injuries (skull fracture, caput succedaneum, cephalohematoma, cutaneous facial lesions and facial palsy, scalp, extracranial hemorrhages, subgaleal hemorrhage, subaponeurotic haemorrhage, intracranial injuries)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
300973
0
Query!
Timepoint [16]
300973
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
300974
0
Incidence of low Apgar Scores (less than 7 at 1st minute and less than 7 at 5th minute)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
300974
0
Query!
Timepoint [17]
300974
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
300975
0
Incidence of admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and length of stay (> 7 days) in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Query!
Assessment method [18]
300975
0
Query!
Timepoint [18]
300975
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
300976
0
Incidence of retinal hemorrhage as routinely diagnosed at the centers
Query!
Assessment method [19]
300976
0
Query!
Timepoint [19]
300976
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
300977
0
Incidence of anaemia anemia as routinely diagnosed at the centers
Query!
Assessment method [20]
300977
0
Query!
Timepoint [20]
300977
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
300978
0
Incidence of jaundice as routinely diagnosed at the centers
Query!
Assessment method [21]
300978
0
Query!
Timepoint [21]
300978
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
300979
0
Evidence of infection by local standards as routinely diagnosed at the centers
Query!
Assessment method [22]
300979
0
Query!
Timepoint [22]
300979
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
300980
0
Phototherapy
Query!
Assessment method [23]
300980
0
Query!
Timepoint [23]
300980
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
300981
0
Incidence of fetal or neonatal death
Query!
Assessment method [24]
300981
0
Query!
Timepoint [24]
300981
0
Immediate postpartum period
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Age more or equal to 18 years, and less or equal 35 years
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestational age equal to or more than 37 weeks
- Live fetus
- Fully dilated cervix
- Membranes ruptured (spontaneous or artificial).
- Any anterior occiput presentation.
- Station level equivalent to 2 cm or more below the spines
- Fetal Heart Rate Pattern recorded by continuous fetal electronic monitoring meeting the following criteria: (i) stable baseline rate between 110 and 160 beats/min, (ii) normal short and long term variability, (iii) absence of late decelerations.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
35
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Suspected or confirmed maternal infection
- Prolonged rupture of membranes (>24 hours)
- Meconium stained
- History of coagulation disorder
- Previous uterine surgery
- Intrapartum hemorrhage
- Absolute cephalopelvic disproportion
- Known recto-vaginal Streptoccocus B Haemolyticcus positive culture
- Known HIV positive women
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Women will be approached during antenatal visits by a midwife who will explain the study objective and procedures. If the woman agrees to receive more information about the study, she will be fully briefed by a member of the study team who will review the consent form and show her the Odon device and how it functions. An explanatory video will also be made available. She will take the information home to think about it and discuss with family members if she wishes. She can sign the consent form when she returns for the next antenatal visit. Consent will be obtained before the initiation of labor.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
This is a medical device pilot trial and women are not randomized to the intervention.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Descriptive analysis will be carried out to show the frequencies of maternal and fetal complications, which will be reported as rates or means and 95% confidence intervals.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Data analysis is complete
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons/comments
Query!
Other reasons
After the 49th patient a decision was made by the company to end the pilot study in favor of a randomized pivotal clinical study
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/03/2011
Query!
Actual
1/03/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/06/2017
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/06/2017
Query!
Sample size
Target
130
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
49
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
4831
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [1]
4831
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [2]
10671
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [2]
10671
0
Pretoria, Johannesburg and Cape Town
Query!
Country [3]
10672
0
Kenya
Query!
State/province [3]
10672
0
Nairobi
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
286656
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
286656
0
World Health Organization
Query!
Address [1]
286656
0
Avenue Appia 21
1211 Geneva 27
Query!
Country [1]
286656
0
Switzerland
Query!
Funding source category [2]
300184
0
Other
Query!
Name [2]
300184
0
Saving Lives at Birth: A Grand Challenge for Development Rounds 1 and 5
Query!
Address [2]
300184
0
Ronald Reagan Bldg and International Trade Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20004
Query!
Country [2]
300184
0
United States of America
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
World Health Organization
Query!
Address
Avenue Appia 21
1211 Geneva 27
Query!
Country
Switzerland
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
285435
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
285435
0
Query!
Address [1]
285435
0
Query!
Country [1]
285435
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
288728
0
WHO Research Ethics Review Committee (ERC)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
288728
0
Avenue Appia 21 1211 Geneva
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
288728
0
Switzerland
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
288728
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
288728
0
28/09/2010
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
288728
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Intrapartum complications are responsible for approximately half of all maternal deaths and two million stillbirth and neonatal deaths per year. Prolonged second stage of labor is associated with potentially fatal maternal complications and is a major cause of stillbirth and newborn morbidity and mortality. Currently, the three main options for managing prolonged second stage of labor are cesarean section, forceps and vacuum extractor. All three clinical practices require relatively expensive equipment, highly trained staff that are often not available in low resource settings and, even if available, their use is associated with increased maternal and perinatal complications. The specific aim of the proposed study is to test the safety and feasibility of a new device (Odon Device) to deliver the fetus during prolonged second stage of labor. The Odon device is a low cost, easy to use technological innovation to facilitate operative vaginal delivery and designed to minimize trauma to the mother and baby. This device may be potentially safer and easier to apply than forceps/vacuum extractor for assisted deliveries, and a safe alternative to some caesarean sections. If proven safe and effective, the Odon Device will be the first innovation in operative vaginal delivery since the independent development of forceps and the vacuum extractor centuries ago. The Odon device could play a major role in improving intrapartum obstetric care in low resource settings by making possible effective management of intrapartum complications in facilities lacking surgical capacity and/or personnel adequately trained in the use of forceps and the vacuum extractor.
Query!
Trial website
none
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Schvartzman JA, Krupitzki H, Merialdi M2, Betrán AP, Requejo J, Nguyen MH, Vayena E, Fiorillo AE1, Gadow EC, Vizcaino FM, von Petery F, Marroquin V, Cafferata ML, Mazzoni A, Vannevel V, Pattinson RC, Gülmezoglu AM, Althabe F, Bonet M; World Health Organization Odon Device Research Group. Odon device for instrumental vaginal deliveries: results of a medical device pilot clinical study. Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 12;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0485-8. World Health Organization Odon Device Research Group1, Schvartzman JA, Krupitzki H, Betran AP, Requejo J, Bergel E, Fiorillo AE, Gadow EC, Vizcaino FM, von Petery F, Althabe F, Belizan J, Borruto F, Boulvain M, Di Renzo GC, Gülmezoglu M, Hofmeyr J, Judge K, Leung TY, Nguyen MH, Saugstad OD, Temmerman M, Treisser A, Vayena E, Merialdi M. Feasibility and safety study of a new device (Odón device) for assisted vaginal deliveries: study protocol.Reprod Health. 2013 Jul 2;10:33. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-33.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
37506
0
Dr Javier Schvartzman
Query!
Address
37506
0
Av. Galván 4102 1431FWO, Buenos Aires
Query!
Country
37506
0
Argentina
Query!
Phone
37506
0
+54 11 5299-0100
Query!
Fax
37506
0
Query!
Email
37506
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
37507
0
Mercedes Bonet
Query!
Address
37507
0
World Health Organization
Avenue Appia 21
1211 Geneva 27
Query!
Country
37507
0
Switzerland
Query!
Phone
37507
0
+411227913347
Query!
Fax
37507
0
+41797914171
Query!
Email
37507
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
37508
0
Mercedes Bonet
Query!
Address
37508
0
World Health Organization
Avenue Appia 21
1211 Geneva 27
Query!
Country
37508
0
Switzerland
Query!
Phone
37508
0
+411227913347
Query!
Fax
37508
0
+41797914171
Query!
Email
37508
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Odon device for instrumental vaginal deliveries: Results of a medical device pilot clinical study.
2018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0485-8
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF