Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000528752
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
2/05/2013
Date registered
13/05/2013
Date last updated
13/05/2013
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The effect of a follow up service on health related quality of life in patients post sepsis syndromes.
Query!
Scientific title
The effect of a multidisciplinary follow up service on health related quality of life in patients post sepsis syndromes: a randomized controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
282408
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1142-4194
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Post Sepsis syndromes
288990
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
289331
289331
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
289405
289405
0
0
Query!
Physiotherapy
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
289406
289406
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients in the intervention group will attend a follow-up clinic monthly for 1.5 hours for up to six months after discharge from the hospital. Screening instruments will be utilized and appropriate management and referral provided. Examples of screening instruments are: overall medical review involving all systems assessment, medications, vital signs, assessment of mobility (modified Rivermead Mobility Index), balance assessment (Berg Balance measure) referrals to community for further rehabilitation, discussion with carer as to concerns (Zarit Burden interview), screening for chronic pain syndromes, nutritional review - referral to nutritionists and/or speech pathology if required, screening with UK-PTSS-14 (for post traumatic stress syndrome) and K-10 inventory for depression, referral to general practitioner or psychologists if needed, referral for occupational assessment re return to work or activities of daily living, liaison with general practitioners.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
287041
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients in the control group will have usual care ie referred to specialist outpatient clinics and/or general practitioners on discharge
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
289446
0
The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) which consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. The eight sections are:
1. vitality
2. physical functioning
3. bodily pain
4. general health perceptions
5. physical role functioning
6. emotional role functioning
7. social role functioning
8. mental health
Query!
Assessment method [1]
289446
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
289446
0
Baseline (enrolment), six months and twelve months post baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
302489
0
Readmission to hospital
Query!
Assessment method [1]
302489
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
302489
0
Total numbers readmitted to any hospital compared between groups at 12 months post enrolment
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
302490
0
Mortality
Query!
Assessment method [2]
302490
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
302490
0
Total numbers who die compared between groups at 12 months post enrolment
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
302491
0
Health care resource use - will be monitored through examination of patient medical records, patient self-report and through Medicare / Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data extraction.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
302491
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
302491
0
This will be compared between groups at 6 and 12 months post enrolment
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
302492
0
Individual patient productivity - This will be measured using a work/activity impairment questionnaire, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
302492
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
302492
0
This will be compared between groups at 6 and 12 months post enrolment
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Patients included will be male or female,
2. >18 years,
3. documented episode(s) of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock
4. Required intensive care admission
5. Required mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 hours
6. Discharged to community or low level facility
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
96
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Neurological injuries,
2. Spinal injuries
3. Burns injury
4. Non-English speaking
5. Mini-mental state examination<25/30
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The clinical staff will screen daily for patients while in intensive care. If patients appear suitable for the study, on discharge to the ward they will ask the patient as to whether the investigators may approach them to discuss the study. The patient will then be approached and provided with information about the study and asked for informed consent. If consent is obtained, the patient will be randomized to one of two groups by the use of computer randomization by an independent perspn unaware of the patients current condition.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
This will be via a computer generated randomization
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample size –
Power calculations are based on SF-36 using previously published Minimally Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs) for the SF36 physical domain scores of 7.8 points (sd 15). The sample size, based on a two sample comparison of means was calculated at 78 per group for the SF-36 at 90% power with a two-sided, alpha error level of 0.05. Allowing for an almost 30% loss to follow up (mortality, drop outs) a total of 204 participants will be required
A baseline comparison of demographics, severity of illness acute physiological and chronic health evaluation score (APACHE II), and baseline measures will be done between each group, using a combination of t-tests and Chi-square.
Primary outcome: SF-36 domain scores and the summary score (utility) derived from the SF-36) will be compared between groups using a mixed model effect to allow for missing data. Secondary outcomes: Mortality will be compared between groups using a Cox proportional hazards (time until death) analysis proportional hazards (time until death) analysis. Time to first readmission will be compared between groups by a survival analysis. Health care costs will be compared between groups using a GLM to account for the non normal distribution. Economic (health resource) evaluation will be an incremental cost utility analysis. Direct costs included will be: cost of care provided in hospitals, by GP’s, home nursing, complementary [allied] health providers, alternative health providers, opportunity cost of unpaid carers, cost of transportation to program and to other health services, and cost of pharmaceuticals. Indirect costs include loss of productivity due to disease, such as time lost from work or providing informal care to another individual. All costs will be valued using market costs where available and productivity costs will be valued using actual patient wage rates.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
3/06/2013
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
204
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
958
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
6813
0
4029 - Royal Brisbane Hospital
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
287204
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
287204
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital Research Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
287204
0
Butterfield St,
Herston 4029, QLD
Query!
Country [1]
287204
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Queensland
Query!
Address
Mayne Medical School
288 Herston Road, Herston
Brisbane, QLD, 4006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
285967
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
285967
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
285967
0
100 Butterfield St,
Herston QLD 4029
Query!
Country [1]
285967
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
289196
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
289196
0
Floor 7, Block 7 Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospiral Butterfield St, Herston 4029, QLD
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
289196
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
289196
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
289196
0
24/04/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
289196
0
HREC/2013/QRBW/17
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
289197
0
The University of Queensland HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
289197
0
Cumbrae Stewart Building, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, QLD
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
289197
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
289197
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
289197
0
02/05/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
289197
0
#2013000543
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
IMPROVING OUTCOME OF SEPSIS Greater numbers of patients are surviving intensive care but have poor quality of life due to immobility, poor cognition, post traumatic stress disorder, depression and frequent readmissions to hospital. Patients with a severe infection “sepsis” are particularly affected. This study aims to improve the overall outcome of critically ill patients with sepsis, through a follow up outpatient service. The intervention group will be screened by several instruments and appropriate referrals made. This trial will investigate whether these interventions can prevent readmission to hospital; improve health related quality of life, decrease mortality, and decrease utilization of health resources thereby decreasing the burden on the Australian health system.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
39610
0
Dr Jennifer Paratz
Query!
Address
39610
0
Level 3, NHB,
Dept of Intensive Care Medicine,
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital,
Butterfield St,
Herston 4029 QLD
Query!
Country
39610
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
39610
0
61 7 36461980
Query!
Fax
39610
0
61 7 36463542
Query!
Email
39610
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
39611
0
Jennifer Paratz
Query!
Address
39611
0
Level 3, NHB,
Dept of Intensive Care Medicine,
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital,
Butterfield St,
Herston 4029 QLD
Query!
Country
39611
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
39611
0
61 7 36461980
Query!
Fax
39611
0
61 7 36463542
Query!
Email
39611
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
39612
0
Robert Boots
Query!
Address
39612
0
Level 3, NHB,
Dept of Intensive Care Medicine,
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital,
Butterfield St,
Herston 4029 QLD
Query!
Country
39612
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
39612
0
61 7 36461949
Query!
Fax
39612
0
61 7 36463542
Query!
Email
39612
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF