Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000779774
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/06/2013
Date registered
12/07/2013
Date last updated
12/07/2013
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
CARE4STROKE: Caregiver mediated exercises with E-health support to improve intensity of training after stroke.
Query!
Scientific title
CARE4STROKE: The effect of caregiver mediated exercises with E-health support to improve intensity of training on physical mobility and length of stay in patients with stroke.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
282629
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
CARE4STROKE
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Mobility impairment after stroke
289323
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Stroke
289664
289664
0
0
Query!
Ischaemic
Query!
Stroke
289665
289665
0
0
Query!
Haemorrhagic
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
289867
289867
0
0
Query!
Physiotherapy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The CARE4STROKE programme consists of 8 weeks of complementary exercise therapy done with a caregiver, next to the usual therapy. Thirty-one standardized exercises are available, that can be customized per patient and caregiver to the individual situation. The exercises can be presented in a book version with photos and text or in a smartphone/ tablet app with video's and voiceover. The exercises are aimed at improving skills related to walking ability like sitting, standing and making transfers, or are supporting exercises to improve mobility, strength and balance. The patient and their caregiver are asked to do the exercises for the length of 8 weeks, minimally 5 times a week for 30 minutes. Additionally, participants in the intervention group will wear the fitbit for the length of 8 weeks after randomization. The fitbit activity monitor is a portable lightweight clip-on device which aims to empower and encourage activity by provided real-time feedback on e.g. number of steps taken, distance covered and number of calories burned. During the 8-week intervention period patients and their caregiver will have a weekly session (approximately 30 min) with a trained therapist. In this session, the participating couple will be instructed as to which exercises should be performed safely during the next week and evaluate the exercises done last week. The programme starts when the patient is admitted to hospital. When the discharge date of the patient is earlier than the finishing of the programme, the programme continues at home (up to 8 weeks from randomisation). Tele-rehabilitation services will allow for instructions of the physical therapists including monitoring progress of patients by e-Health services including telephone conferencing based counselling (frequency as required) and weekly visits by a coordinating physical therapist from the setting of discharge.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
287296
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Usual rehabilitation care: interdisciplinary rehabilitation following the standards outlined by the clinical guidelines for stroke management (addressing mobility impairment, dysphagia or communication difficulties, upper limb activity, sensorimotor impairment, activities of daily living, cognition etc.)
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
289744
0
Stroke Impact Scale immediately post-intervention (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
289744
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
289744
0
At 8 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
303158
0
Length of stay (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
303158
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
303158
0
At discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
303159
0
Rivermead mobility index (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
303159
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
303159
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
303160
0
Walking ability with 10-m timed walk and Timed up and go test (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
303160
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
303160
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
303161
0
Nottingham extended ADL (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
303161
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
303161
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
303162
0
Modified Rankin Scale (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
303162
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
303162
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
303163
0
Fugl Meyer (FM) lower extremity (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
303163
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
303163
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
303164
0
Motricity Index (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
303164
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
303164
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
303165
0
Berg Balance Scale (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
303165
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
303165
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
303166
0
Activity levels, measured with activPAL (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
303166
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
303166
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
303167
0
Expanded Caregiver Strain Index (caregiver)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
303167
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
303167
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
303168
0
Amount of (additional) practice done measured with a diary (both)
Query!
Assessment method [11]
303168
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
303168
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
303169
0
Satisfaction with the intervention, measured by purpose-made questionnaire (both)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
303169
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
303169
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
303170
0
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (both)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
303170
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
303170
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
303171
0
Fatigue Severity Scale (both)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
303171
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
303171
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
303172
0
Stroke Impact Scale (patient)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
303172
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
303172
0
At 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
303231
0
CarerQOL (caregiver)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
303231
0
Query!
Timepoint [16]
303231
0
At 8 and 12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
303589
0
The Modified Computer Self Efficacy Scale (both)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
303589
0
Query!
Timepoint [17]
303589
0
Baseline
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
303590
0
The System Usability Scale (both)
Query!
Assessment method [18]
303590
0
Query!
Timepoint [18]
303590
0
At 8 weeks
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria for the patient:
- 18 years or older
- able to understand the English language
- able to appoint a caregiver
- being in the early rehabilitation phase (24 hours- 3 months)
- being able to follow instructions (a MMSE score > 23 points)
- Functional Ambulation Score (FAC) < 5
- a score of <11 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Inclusion criteria for the caregiver:
- 18 years or older
- able to understand the English language
- a score of <11 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
- medically stable and physically able to perform the exercises together with the patient
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria for both patient and caregiver will be serious comorbidity which interferes with participation.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Block randomisation
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Descriptive statistics: Participation rate, compliance, satisfaction with the intervention and safety of the intervention will be reported as nominal variables to assess the feasibility. This will include frequencies, means and standard deviations. Most of the patient and caregiver characteristics will be considered as qualitative, categorical variables.
Univariate analysis: Baseline characteristics will be presented and between group differences will be studied to determine whether groups are comparable at baseline. When these data are not normally distributed, non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank sum test will be used. When the data are normally distributed student t-test will be used. Alpha will be set at 0.05.
Multivariate analysis: The main outcomes will be compared between the intervention and control group at the different timepoints T0, T1, T2 using repeated measures Analysis Of Variance with factors group (2 levels) and time (3 levels) when the data are normally distributed. The Kruskal-Wallis test will be used when the data is not normally distributed. Alpha will be set at 0.05. SPSS version 20 will be used for all analyses.
We expect a significant reduction of 11% (5 points) in the self-reported mobility domain of the SIS version 3.0 (van de Port 2012) in favour of those patients who are allocated to the experimental group. ICC is known to be about 0.9. We expect minimally 28 patients are required per arm of the trial. Expecting a drop-out rate of 10%, we suppose that a minimum of 62 stroke patients are required to achieve a sufficient statistical power of 80%.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/07/2013
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
62
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
1091
0
Flinders Medical Centre
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
1092
0
Repatriation Hospital - Daw Park
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
287408
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
287408
0
Hospital Trust Funds
Query!
Address [1]
287408
0
Repatriation General Hospital
216 Daws Rd
Daw Park SA 5041, Australia
Query!
Country [1]
287408
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
287591
0
Government body
Query!
Name [2]
287591
0
NHMRC Partnership Grant Cognitive Impairment and Physical Conditions
Query!
Address [2]
287591
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
GPO Box 1421
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [2]
287591
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Prof Maria Crotty
Query!
Address
Flinders University School of Medicine, Dep of Rehabilitation, Aged & Extended Care
Repatriation General Hospital
Daws Road
Daw Park, South Australia, 5041
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
286162
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
286162
0
Query!
Address [1]
286162
0
Query!
Country [1]
286162
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
277446
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
277446
0
VU University Medical Center
Unit Neurorehabilitation
Query!
Address [1]
277446
0
Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine
Boelelaan 1117
1081 HV Amsterdam
Query!
Country [1]
277446
0
Netherlands
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
277447
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [2]
277447
0
Reade center for rehabilitation and rheumatology
Query!
Address [2]
277447
0
Overtoom 283
1054 HW Amsterdam
Query!
Country [2]
277447
0
Netherlands
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
289382
0
Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
289382
0
The Flats, G5 - Rooms 3 and 4 Flinders Drive Flinders Medical Centre BEDFORD PARK SA 5042
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
289382
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
289382
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
289382
0
07/06/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
289382
0
167.13
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Several systematic reviews have indicated that additional exercise therapy and repetitive task training have a significant effect on functional outcome after stroke. Guidelines therefore conclude that patients in a rehabilitation setting should have the opportunity to get an increase of intensity of therapy. A new method to meet these recommendations could be to involve caregivers (partner, family, friends) in exercise training. Previous studies suggest that this form of exercises done with a caregiver can lead to a better functional outcome for the patient and less strain for the caregiver. This feasibility study will test the proof of concept of caregiver mediated exercises when combined with innovative ICT techniques (CARE4STROKE package) aimed at improving gait, ADL independency and allowing early discharge to patients own home setting after stroke. We hypothesize that patients allocated to the CARE4STROKE programme will show better outcomes in terms of gait, gait-related activities and ADL with a reduced length of stay (LOS) when compared to usual care alone. In addition we hypothesize that this programme leads to increased levels of self-efficacy for patient and caregiver and a reduced caregiver burden. This study is related to the CARE4STROKE trial registered on NTR with ID: NTR3739.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
40574
0
Prof Maria Crotty
Query!
Address
40574
0
Flinders University School of Medicine, Dep of Rehabilitation, Aged & Extended Care
Repatriation General Hospital
Daws Road
Daw Park, South Australia, 5041
Query!
Country
40574
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
40574
0
+61 (8) 8275 1103
Query!
Fax
40574
0
Query!
Email
40574
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
40575
0
Maayken van den Berg
Query!
Address
40575
0
Flinders University School of Medicine, Dep of Rehabilitation, Aged & Extended Care
Repatriation General Hospital
Daws Road
Daw Park, South Australia, 5041
Query!
Country
40575
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
40575
0
+61 (8) 8275 1297
Query!
Fax
40575
0
Query!
Email
40575
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
40576
0
Maayken van den Berg
Query!
Address
40576
0
Flinders University School of Medicine, Dep of Rehabilitation, Aged & Extended Care
Repatriation General Hospital
Daws Road
Daw Park, South Australia, 5041
Query!
Country
40576
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
40576
0
+61 (8) 8275 1297
Query!
Fax
40576
0
Query!
Email
40576
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Early supported discharge by caregiver-mediated exercises and e-health support after stroke: A proof-of-concept trial.
2016
https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013431
Embase
Comparing two identically protocolized, multicentre, randomized controlled trials on caregiver-mediated exercises poststroke: Any differences across countries?.
2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263013
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF