Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000888763
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
1/08/2013
Date registered
8/08/2013
Date last updated
1/02/2018
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of the effect of Serenoa Repens on prostatic inflammation
Query!
Scientific title
Does treatment with Serenoa Repens results in improvement of inflammation score compared to no treatment, in men with histologically prostatic inflammation?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
282941
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Nil
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Prostatic inflammation
289763
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Alternative and Complementary Medicine
290101
290101
0
0
Query!
Herbal remedies
Query!
Renal and Urogenital
290102
290102
0
0
Query!
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients with prostatic inflammation based on biopsy result are randomized to receive either Serenoa Repens (oral capsules for 6 months) 320mg daily (Group 1) or no treatment (Group 2). Monitoring will be based on patients' tablet return.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
287645
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Active, no treatment
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
290142
0
Inflammation score (Irani et al 1997)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
290142
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
290142
0
Six months after intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
304009
0
Immunohistochemical study of inflammation
- CD3, CD4, CD8 T-lymphocytes
- CD20 B-lymphocytes
- CD163 macrophages
The outcome will be assesed depending on prostate biopsy results.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
304009
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
304009
0
Six months after intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients with proven inflammation in prostatic biopsy
Query!
Minimum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
85
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients who have been already treated for LUTS with herbal medication.
Patients who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer at the first biopsy.
Patients who underwent pelvic radiotherapy for any reason.
Patients with a permanent urethral catheter.
Patient with a previous TURP or intravesical instillations due to bladder cancer.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
www.randomizer.org, central randomization by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomization using a randomization table created by computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Nil
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
We estimated, using current data, that a significant difference in inflammation score could be standarized at 25%. Power of the study was calculated at 90%, using https://www.dssresearch.com power calculator, so each Group should have 50 enrollments (totally 100).
Statistical analysis of our results will take place using non-parametrical methods.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/07/2012
Query!
Actual
20/07/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/12/2014
Query!
Actual
22/12/2014
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
13/07/2015
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
100
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
5258
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [1]
5258
0
Thessaly
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
298557
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
298557
0
Prof. Gravas Stavros
Query!
Address [1]
298557
0
6-8 Feidioiu Str.
412 21
Larissa
Query!
Country [1]
298557
0
Greece
Query!
Funding source category [2]
298558
0
Other
Query!
Name [2]
298558
0
None
Query!
Address [2]
298558
0
None
Query!
Country [2]
298558
0
Greece
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Prof. Stavros Gravas
Query!
Address
Prof. Stavros Gravas
6-8 Fediou Str
41221
Larissa
Query!
Country
Greece
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
286448
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
286448
0
Query!
Address [1]
286448
0
Query!
Country [1]
286448
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
289673
0
Scientific Committee University Hospital of Larisa
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
289673
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
289673
0
Greece
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
289673
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
289673
0
08/06/2011
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
289673
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to determine the effect of Serenoa Repens use on prostatic inflammation, based on histological and immunohistochemical criteria. Patients with prostatic inflammation based on biopsy results are randomized to receive either Serenoa Repens 320mg/d (Group 1) or no treatment (Group 2). Patients will receive a second biopsy 6 months later. Inflammation score and immunohistochemical results, with or without treatment with Serenoa Repens, will be statistically compared, so as to evaluate the effect on the prostatic inflammation.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
None
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
41894
0
Prof Gravas Stavros, Urology Profesor, Urology Department of University of Thessaly
Query!
Address
41894
0
Feidiou 6-8 Str
41221
Larissa
Query!
Country
41894
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
41894
0
+306944626086
Query!
Fax
41894
0
Query!
Email
41894
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
41895
0
Samarinas Michael Urology Resident, Urology Department of University of Thessaly
Query!
Address
41895
0
Urology Resident, Urology Department of University of Thessaly
Viopolis Mezourlo
41335
Larisa
Query!
Country
41895
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
41895
0
+306946006798
Query!
Fax
41895
0
Query!
Email
41895
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
41896
0
Gravas Stavros Urology Professor, Urology Department of University of Thessaly
Query!
Address
41896
0
Feidiou 6-8 Str
41221
Larissa
Query!
Country
41896
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
41896
0
+306944626086
Query!
Fax
41896
0
Query!
Email
41896
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
The clinical impact of hexanic extract of Serenoa repens in men with prostatic inflammation: A post Hoc analysis of a randomized biopsy study.
2020
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040957
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF