Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01721057
Registration number
NCT01721057
Ethics application status
Date submitted
1/11/2012
Date registered
2/11/2012
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study in Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Participants
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Patients With Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
I4V-MC-JADX
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
14059
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
RA-BUILD
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Rheumatoid Arthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Treatment: Drugs - Baricitinib
Treatment: Drugs - cDMARD
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Placebo administered orally once daily through Week 24. Starting at Week 16, participants who are nonresponders will be rescued with baricitinib 4 milligram (mg) orally once daily through Week 24.
Participants will continue to take background conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (cDMARD) therapy throughout study.
Experimental: Baricitinib 2 mg - Baricitinib 2 mg administered orally once daily through Week 24. Starting at Week 16, participants who are nonresponders will be rescued with baricitinib 4 mg orally once daily through Week 24.
Participants will continue to take background cDMARD therapy throughout study.
Experimental: Baricitinib 4 mg - Baricitinib 4 mg administered orally once daily through Week 24. Starting at Week 16, participants who are nonresponders will be rescued with baricitinib 4 mg orally daily through Week 24.
Participants will continue to take background cDMARD therapy throughout study.
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Administered orally
Treatment: Drugs: Baricitinib
Administered orally
Treatment: Drugs: cDMARD
Conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug as a background therapy
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement (ACR20)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ACR20 Responder Index is a composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). "ACR20 Responder" is a participant who has at least 20% improvement in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using visual analog scale (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), pain due to arthritis, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Participants with missing responses and participants who discontinue study or drug or are rescued before analysis timepoint are deemed non-responders.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The HAQ-DI questionnaire assesses the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty (0 \[without any difficulty\], 1 \[with some difficulty\], 2 \[with much difficulty\], and 3 \[unable to do\])when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and performing other daily activities. Scores for each functional area were averaged to calculate the HAQ-DI score, which ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (worst disability). A decrease in HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score Based on a 28-Joint Count and High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Disease Activity Score (DAS) modified to include 28 joint count (DAS28) consisted of composite score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using visual analog scale (VAS) (participant global VAS). DAS28 was calculated using following formula: DAS28-CRP=0.56\*square root (sqrt)(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*Patient's Global VAS+0.96. Scores ranged 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) =3.3
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
SDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in RA that integrates TJC28, SJC28, acute phase response using C-reactive protein (milligrams per liter), Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using VAS centimeters (cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using VAS (cm). The SDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 5 components. Lower scores indicated less disease activity. An index-based definition of remission occurs with an SDAI score =3.3.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Mean Duration of Morning Joint Stiffness(MJS) in the Prior 7 Days as Collected in Electronic Daily Diaries
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Participants reported the duration of their morning joint stiffness (MJS) in hours and minutes into daily electronic diaries. If MJS duration was longer than 12 hours (720 minutes), it was truncated to 720 minutes for statistical presentations and analyses. The average value across the 7 days preceding each visit is calculated. A decrease in duration of MJS indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Mean Severity of Morning Joint Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the Prior 7 Days as Collected in Electronic Diaries
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Participants rated the severity of their MJS by selecting a number from 0 to 10 that best described their overall level of MJS from the time they woke up, where 0 represents "no joint stiffness" and 10 represents "joint stiffness as bad as you can imagine". Participants reported their severity daily in electronic diaries. The average value across the 7 days preceding each visit is calculated. A decrease in severity rating indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Mean Worst Tiredness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the Prior 7 Days as Collected in Electronic Diaries
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Participants rated their tiredness by selecting a number from 0 to 10 that best described their level of worst tiredness during the past 24 hours, where 0 represents "no tiredness" and 10 represents "as bad as you can imagine". Participants reported their worst tiredness in daily electronic diaries. The average value across the 7 days preceding each visit is calculated. A decrease in tiredness severity rating indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Mean Worst Joint Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the Prior 7 Days as Collected in Electronic Diaries
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Participants rated their joint pain by selecting a number from 0 to 10 that best described their worst joint pain during the last 24 hours, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "pain as bad as you can imagine". Participants reported their worst joint pain in daily electronic diaries. The average value across the 7 days preceding each visit is calculated. A decrease in joint pain severity rating indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
ACR50 Responder Index is composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in RA. "ACR50 Responder" is a participant who has at least 50% improvement in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria:
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, pain due to arthritis, and hsCRP. Participants with missing responses and participants who discontinue study or drug or are rescued before analysis timepoint are deemed non-responders.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Week 12, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
ACR70 Responder Index is composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures in RA. "ACR70 Responder" is a participant who has at least 70% improvement in both tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 criteria: Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, HAQ-DI, pain due to arthritis, and hsCRP. Participants with missing responses and participants who discontinue study or drug or are rescued before analysis timepoint are deemed non-responders.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Week 12, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Measures of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
• The CDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in RA that does not require a laboratory component and was scored by the investigative site. It integrates TJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), SJC28 (scored 0-28 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on a visual analogue scale from 0-10 cm with higher scores indicating higher disease activity). The CDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 4 components. CDAI scores range from 0 to 76; lower scores indicated lower disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in condition.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Measures of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The SDAI is a tool for measurement of disease activity in RA that integrates TJC28, SJC28, acute phase response using C-reactive protein (milligrams per liter), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using visual analog scale (cm), and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using visual analog scale (cm). The SDAI is calculated by summing the values of the 5 components. Lower scores indicated less disease activity. The SDAI is expressed as a score on a scale with the minimum score=0 (best) to maximum score=86 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Change From Baseline in DAS28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
DAS28 consisted of composite score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. DAS28 was calculated using following formula: DAS28-ESR=0.56\*square root (sqrt)(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.70\*natural log(ESR)+0.014\*Patient's Global VAS. Scores ranged 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Remission - Boolean Remission
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The ACR/EULAR definitions of RA remission includes a Boolean-based definition. The Boolean-based definition of remission occurs when all 4 of the following criteria are met at the same visit: TJC28 =1, SJC28 =1, acute phase response using C-reactive protein (milligrams per deciliter) =1, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using VAS (cm) =1.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Week 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores.
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scale is a brief 13-item, symptom-specific questionnaire that specifically assesses the participant's self-reported severity of fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and functioning. The FACIT-F uses a numeric rating scale of 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much") for each item to assess fatigue and its impact in the past 7 days. Total scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12; Baseline Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS), Physical Component Score (PCS) of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 Acute (SF-36v2 Acute)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (mental \[MCS\] and physical \[PCS\]). MCS consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. PCS consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized measure of health status of the participant. One component consists of a descriptive system of the respondent's health comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1. A higher score indicates better health state.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline Week 12; Baseline Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores (Self-Perceived Health)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
A second component of the EQ-5D-5L is a self-perceived health score which is assessed using a VAS that ranges from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 indicates the worst health you can imagine and 100 indicates the best health you can imagine.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline Week 12; Baseline Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPAI-RA) Scores
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPAI-RA) questionnaire was developed to measure the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities in the 7 days prior to the visit. It contains 6 items covering overall work productivity (health), overall work productivity (symptom), impairment of regular activities (health), and impairment of regular activities (symptom). Scores are calculated as impairment percentages. The WPAI-RA yields four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteeism (impairment at work), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment), and Activity impairment.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Population Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration at Steady State of Dosing (Cmax,ss) of LY3009104
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Week 0: 30 and 90 minutes postdose; Week 8: 1 hour postdose; Week 12, Week 20 and Week 24:predose
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Population PK: Maximum Concentration at Steady State of Dosing (AUC,ss) of LY3009104
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Week 0: 30 and 90 minutes postdose; Week 8: 1 hour postdose; Week 12, Week 20 and Week 24; predose
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Have a diagnosis of adult-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) as defined by the American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2010 Criteria for the Classification of RA
* Have moderately to severely active RA defined as the presence of at least 6/68 tender joints and at least 6/66 swollen joints
* Have a C-reactive protein (CRP) or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) measurement = (greater than or equal to) 1.2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Have had an insufficient response or are intolerant to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and either:
* Have had regular use of a cDMARD for at least the 12 weeks prior to study entry with a continuous, nonchanging dose for at least 8 weeks prior to study entry
* For participants not receiving a cDMARD at the time of entry, the investigator will document in the participant's history that the participant had failed, was unable to tolerate, or had a contraindication to treatment with a cDMARD
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Are currently receiving corticosteroids at doses > (greater than)10 mg per day of prednisone (or equivalent) or have been receiving an unstable dosing regimen of corticosteroids within 2 weeks of study entry or within 6 weeks of planned randomization
* Have started treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or have been receiving an unstable dosing regimen of NSAIDs within 2 weeks of study entry or within 6 weeks of planned randomization
* Are currently receiving concomitant treatment with methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine, and sulfasalazine or combination of any 3 cDMARDs
* Have ever received any biologic DMARD
* Have received interferon therapy within 4 weeks prior to study entry or are anticipated to require interferon therapy during the study
* Have received any parenteral corticosteroid administered by intramuscular or intravenous (IV) injection within 2 weeks prior to study entry or within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization or are anticipated to require parenteral injection of corticosteroids during the study
* Have had 3 or more joints injected with intraarticular corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid within 2 weeks prior to study entry or within 6 weeks prior to planned randomization
* Have active fibromyalgia that, in the investigator's opinion, would make it difficult to appropriately assess RA activity for the purposes of this study
* Have a diagnosis of any systemic inflammatory condition other than RA, such as, but not limited to juvenile chronic arthritis,spondyloarthropathy, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriatic arthritis, active vasculitis or gout(participants with secondary Sjogren's syndrome are not excluded.)
* Have a diagnosis of Felty's syndrome
* Have had any major surgery within 8 weeks of study entry or will require major surgery during the study that, in the opinion of the investigator in consultation with Lilly or its designee, would pose an unacceptable risk to the participant
* Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of study entry: myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or have New York Heart Association stage IV heart failure
* Have a history or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other serious and/or unstable illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, could constitute a risk when taking investigational product or could interfere with the interpretation of data
* Are largely or wholly incapacitated permitting little or no self care, such as, being bedridden or confined to a wheelchair
* Have an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on the most recent available serum creatinine using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) method of < (less than) 40 milliliter per minute per 1.73 m^2 (mL/min/1.73 m^2)
* Have a history of chronic liver disease with the most recent available aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 times the ULN or the most recent available total bilirubin >/=1.5 times the ULN
* Have a history of, lymphoproliferative disease; or have signs or symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly; or have active primary or recurrent malignant disease; or have been in remission from clinically significant malignancy for <5 years
* Have been exposed to a live vaccine within 12 weeks prior to planned randomization or are expected to need/receive a live vaccine during the course of the study (with the exception of herpes zoster vaccination)
* Have a current or recent clinically serious viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection
* Have had symptomatic herpes zoster infection within 12 weeks prior to study entry
* Have a history of disseminated/complicated herpes zoster (eg, multidermatomal involvement, ophthalmic zoster, central nervous system involvement, postherpetic neuralgia)
* Are immunocompromised and, in the opinion of the investigator, are at an unacceptable risk for participating in the study
* Have a history of active hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
* Have screening laboratory test values, including thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), outside the reference range for the population or investigative site that, in the opinion of the investigator, pose an unacceptable risk for the participant's participation in the study
* Have screening electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities that, in the opinion of the investigator or the sponsor, are clinically significant and indicate an unacceptable risk for the participant's participation in the study (eg, Fridericia's corrected QT interval >500 millisecond [msec] for men and >520 msec for women)
* Have symptomatic herpes simplex at the time of study enrollment
* Have evidence of active or latent tuberculosis (TB)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/12/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/12/2014
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
684
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician. - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4558 - Maroochydore
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Delaware
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Córdoba
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Quilmes
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Tucuman
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Genk
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Merksem
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Mons
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Saskatchewan
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Karlovac
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Osijek
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Varazdin
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Zagreb
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Brno
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Hustopece
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Pardubice
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Uherske Hradiste
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Gommern
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Köln
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Würzburg
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Bekescsaba
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Szekesfehervar
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Veszprem
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Ahmedabad
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Attavar, Mangalore
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Bangalore
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Belgaum
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Gurgaon
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Hyderabaad
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Jaipur
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Kolkata
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Lucknow
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Mumbai
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Secunderabad
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Prato
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Rozzano
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Valeggio Sul Mincio
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Hiroshima
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Kagawa
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Saitama
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Tochigi
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Toyama
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Gwangju
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Mexicali
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Mexico City
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Bydgoszcz
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Elblag
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Nadarzyn
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Almada
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Ponte De Lima
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Caguas
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
San German
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
San Juan
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Santurce
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Bucharest
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Cluj-Napoca
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Constanta
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Ulyanovsk
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Yaroslavl
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Partizanske
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Topolcany
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Bilbao
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Getafe
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Santander
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Villajoyosa
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Kaohsiung City
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Neihu Taipei
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Taichung City
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Yong Kung City
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
England
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Hampshire
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Tyneside
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Eli Lilly and Company
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether baricitinib 4 milligram (mg) once daily (QD) is superior to placebo in the treatment of participants with moderately to severely active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) who have had inadequate response to or are intolerant to at least 1 conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (cDMARD)(cDMARD-IR \[inadequate response\] participants) and who have not received a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01721057
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Taylor PC, Takeuchi T, Burmester GR, Durez P, Smolen JS, Deberdt W, Issa M, Terres JR, Bello N, Winthrop KL. Safety of baricitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a median of 4.6 and up to 9.3 years of treatment: final results from long-term extension study and integrated database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Mar;81(3):335-343. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221276. Epub 2021 Oct 27. van der Heijde D, Kartman CE, Xie L, Beattie S, Schlichting D, Mo D, Durez P, Tanaka Y, Fleischmann R. Radiographic Progression of Structural Joint Damage Over 5 Years of Baricitinib Treatment in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From RA-BEYOND. J Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;49(2):133-141. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.210346. Epub 2021 Sep 15. Wells AF, Jia B, Xie L, Valenzuela GJ, Keystone EC, Li Z, Quebe AK, Griffing K, Otawa S, Haraoui B. Efficacy of Long-Term Treatment with Once-Daily Baricitinib 2 mg in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of Two 24-Week, Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Studies and One Long-Term Extension Study. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Jun;8(2):987-1001. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00317-9. Epub 2021 May 24. Thudium CS, Bay-Jensen AC, Cahya S, Dow ER, Karsdal MA, Koch AE, Zhang W, Benschop RJ. The Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor baricitinib reduces biomarkers of joint destruction in moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Oct 12;22(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02340-7. Emery P, Tanaka Y, Cardillo T, Schlichting D, Rooney T, Beattie S, Helt C, Smolen JS. Temporary interruption of baricitinib: characterization of interruptions and effect on clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 May 15;22(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02199-8. Erratum In: Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Jul 2;22(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02257-1. Bingham CO 3rd, Gaich CL, DeLozier AM, Engstrom KD, Naegeli AN, de Bono S, Banerjee P, Taylor PC. Use of daily electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) diaries in randomized controlled trials for rheumatoid arthritis: rationale and implementation. Trials. 2019 Mar 22;20(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3272-0. Erratum In: Trials. 2019 Jun 4;20(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3463-8. Combe B, Balsa A, Sarzi-Puttini P, Tony HP, de la Torre I, Rogai V, Durand F, Witt S, Zhong J, Dougados M. Efficacy and safety data based on historical or pre-existing conditions at baseline for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who were treated with baricitinib. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Aug;78(8):1135-1138. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214261. Epub 2019 Mar 6. No abstract available. Smolen JS, Genovese MC, Takeuchi T, Hyslop DL, Macias WL, Rooney T, Chen L, Dickson CL, Riddle Camp J, Cardillo TE, Ishii T, Winthrop KL. Safety Profile of Baricitinib in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis with over 2 Years Median Time in Treatment. J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;46(1):7-18. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171361. Epub 2018 Sep 15. Erratum In: J Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;46(12):1648-1649. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171361.C1. Tanaka Y, McInnes IB, Taylor PC, Byers NL, Chen L, de Bono S, Issa M, Macias WL, Rogai V, Rooney TP, Schlichting DE, Zuckerman SH, Emery P. Characterization and Changes of Lymphocyte Subsets in Baricitinib-Treated Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Integrated Analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Dec;70(12):1923-1932. doi: 10.1002/art.40680. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Wells AF, Greenwald M, Bradley JD, Alam J, Arora V, Kartman CE. Baricitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in United States and Rest of World: A Subset Analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Jun;5(1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0110-x. Epub 2018 Apr 21. Taylor PC, Kremer JM, Emery P, Zuckerman SH, Ruotolo G, Zhong J, Chen L, Witt S, Saifan C, Kurzawa M, Otvos JD, Connelly MA, Macias WL, Schlichting DE, Rooney TP, de Bono S, McInnes IB. Lipid profile and effect of statin treatment in pooled phase II and phase III baricitinib studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jul;77(7):988-995. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212461. Epub 2018 Feb 20. Emery P, Blanco R, Maldonado Cocco J, Chen YC, Gaich CL, DeLozier AM, de Bono S, Liu J, Rooney T, Chang CH, Dougados M. Patient-reported outcomes from a phase III study of baricitinib in patients with conventional synthetic DMARD-refractory rheumatoid arthritis. RMD Open. 2017 Mar 21;3(1):e000410. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000410. eCollection 2017. Dougados M, van der Heijde D, Chen YC, Greenwald M, Drescher E, Liu J, Beattie S, Witt S, de la Torre I, Gaich C, Rooney T, Schlichting D, de Bono S, Emery P. Baricitinib in patients with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARDs: results from the RA-BUILD study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):88-95. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210094. Epub 2016 Sep 29. Erratum In: Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;76(9):1634. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210094corr1.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
Query!
Address
0
0
Eli Lilly and Company
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and EU, whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.
Query!
Available to whom?
A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://vivli.org/
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01721057