Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000271505
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/03/2015
Date registered
23/03/2015
Date last updated
30/08/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparing efficacy of music therapy, sucrose and combination of the two for pain relief in neonates undergoing heel prick procedure.
Query!
Scientific title
Comparing efficacy of music therapy, sucrose and combination of the two in neonates for pain relief during heel prick procedure.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286322
0
NIL
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1167-9614
Query!
Trial acronym
Music therapy for Neonates
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Neonatal Pain
294419
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
294729
294729
0
0
Query!
Complications of newborn
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Study neonate undergoing heel prick procedure for blood collection will get in random order - Oral sucrose (Sterile 24%), Music therapy and combination of the above two methods in addition to standrad practice of swaddling and oral pacifier.
Intervention I (MT) - Music therapy
Intervention II (S) - Oral sucrose (24 %) with no music
Intervention III (MT+S) - Oral sucrose (24 %) with music therapy
MT group - In MT group the neonate will be exposed to Passive music therapy with instrumental lullabies with sounds up to 65 dB starting 20 minutes before the heel prick, continuing for 6 minutes after the painful procedure.
S group – In S group the neonates will have no music. He/she will have oral sucrose (24 % sterile solution) 0.5 ml, two minutes prior to the beginning of the heel prick as per the current hospital protocol.
MT+S group - In MT+S group the neonate will be exposed to Passive music therapy with instrumental lullabies with sounds up to 65 dB starting 20 minutes before the heel prick, continuing for 6 minutes after the painful procedure. In addition he/she will then have oral sucrose (24 % sterile solution) 0.5 ml, two minutes prior to the beginning of the heel prick as per the current hospital protocol.
This is a crossover study with each neonate getting all three interventions in random order. There will be a minimum of 40 minutes of 'wash-out' period between subsequent interventions.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
291379
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Oral sucrose therapy for pain relief for heel prick in Neonates.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
294506
0
Is Music therapy or combination of music therapy with sucrose better for pain relief during heel prick procedure when compared with oral sucrose using PIPP score for neonates.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294506
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294506
0
First eight minutes post heel prick procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
313482
0
Is the heart rate more stable in neonates exposed to music therapy as compared to sucrose 24 %. The heart rate will be assessed by continuous video recording of the pulse oximeter, connected to the newborn with saturation probe.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
313482
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
313482
0
Every 30 second (1/2 minute) time slot assessment for seven minutes after heel prick.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
313641
0
Is the oxygen saturation more stable in neonates exposed to music therapy as compared to sucrose 24 %. The oxygen saturation will be assessed by continuous video recording of the pulse oximeter, connected to the newborn with saturation probe.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
313641
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
313641
0
Every 30 second (1/2 minute) time slot assessment for seven minutes after heel prick.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Newborns >/= 32 weeks
2. Stable clinical condition with no need of CPAP/high flow/Ventilation
3. Anticipated need for repeated heel prick samples for monitoring and blood collection
Query!
Minimum age
0
Hours
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
28
Days
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Presence of major congenital abnormality
2. Presence of proven or suspected sepsis
3. Suspicion or confirmed NEC
4. Need of CPAP/high flow/Ventilation in last 24 hrs.
5. Major IVH, history of seizures, HIE, neonatal encephalopathy
6. Hypoglycaemia with BSL < 1.5 mmol/L
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Eligible infants with inclusion criterion would be recruited from high dependency and special care unit of the hospital NICU.
The parents would be approached and be informed in detail about the study, inviting any questions from parents. They will be provided with parent information sheet outlining the study in detail.
Each infant will be exposed to all three therapies (Music Therapy, Oral Sucrose and combination of the two) in random sequence. Allocation concealment of the sequence of therapy will be done by sealed opaque envelopes.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Allocation concealment of the sequence of therapy will be done by sealed opaque envelopes using computer generated sequences.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2015
Query!
Actual
7/07/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/02/2016
Query!
Actual
22/01/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
22/01/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
35
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
35
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
3554
0
Royal North Shore Hospital
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
9359
0
2065 - St Leonards
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
290901
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
290901
0
Department of Neonatology
Royal North Shore Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
290901
0
Reserve Road, St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Country [1]
290901
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal North Shore Hospital
Query!
Address
Department of Neonatology
Reserve Road, St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289583
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
289583
0
Nil
Query!
Address [1]
289583
0
Nil
Query!
Country [1]
289583
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292504
0
North Sydney Local Health District HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292504
0
Level 13 Kolling Building Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292504
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292504
0
16/03/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
292504
0
25/05/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292504
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Does the use of Music Therapy or Combination of music therapy with sucrose (24 % sterile sugar water) provide similar or better pain relief compared to Sucrose during the heel prick procedure. The research is aimmed to see if we can reduce the usage of sucrose, especially repeated and higher dosages in NICU with the help of music therapy which is relatively safe (within the recommened sound dose levels) and developementally appropriate intervention.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
55590
0
Dr Swapnil Shah
Query!
Address
55590
0
Department of Neonatology
Royal North Shore Hospital
Reserve Road, St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Country
55590
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
55590
0
+61 2 9463 2141
Query!
Fax
55590
0
+61 2 9463 2004
Query!
Email
55590
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
55591
0
John Sinn
Query!
Address
55591
0
Department of Neonatology
Royal North Shore Hospital
Reserve Road, St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Country
55591
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
55591
0
+61 2 9463 2141
Query!
Fax
55591
0
+61 2 9463 2004
Query!
Email
55591
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
55592
0
John Sinn
Query!
Address
55592
0
Department of Neonatology
Royal North Shore Hospital
Reserve Road, St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Country
55592
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
55592
0
+61 2 9463 2141
Query!
Fax
55592
0
+61 2 9463 2004
Query!
Email
55592
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Trial of Music, Sucrose, and Combination Therapy for Pain Relief during Heel Prick Procedures in Neonates.
2017
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.003
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF