Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000399594
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
1/04/2015
Date registered
29/04/2015
Date last updated
29/04/2015
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A randomized trial of a minimal psycho-educational intervention for sexual concerns after cancer: A comparison of self-help and professionally delivered modalities
Query!
Scientific title
A randomized trial of a minimal psycho-educational intervention for sexual concerns after cancer: A comparison of self-help and professionally delivered modalities
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286450
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Sexual functioning
294623
0
Query!
Psychological wellbeing
294624
0
Query!
Quality of life
294625
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
294925
294925
0
0
Query!
Any cancer
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Health professional intervention: minimal psycho-educational written information provision (self-help booklet) about cancer related sexual changes accompanied by a single session of counselling.
The health professional consultation consisted of the self-help booklet followed up two weeks later by a one-hour telephone or Skype consultation between the participant and a counsellor trained in discussing sexuality. Concerns or questions raised as a result of reading the booklet were discussed during the consultation, and suggestions for ameliorating sexual problems, based on the specific needs of participants, were offered.
The self-help information booklet is based on accounts of sexual concerns experienced by people with cancer and their partners, consultation with health professionals, and examination of existing written resources on cancer related sexual concerns. It consisted of 68 pages, which provided information about: what is sexuality and intimacy; how cancer and cancer treatment affects sexuality; the body and sex; sexuality across different stages of cancer; talking about sex and intimacy; information for partners and for single people; same-sex relationships; strategies for overcoming sexual concerns, including exploration of non-coital practices and intimacy; and support services available.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
291528
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Intervention code [2]
291649
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Self-help intervention: minimal psycho-educational written information provision about cancer related sexual changes. The self-help information booklet is based on accounts of sexual concerns experienced by people with cancer and their partners, consultation with health professionals, and examination of existing written resources on cancer related sexual concerns. It consisted of 68 pages, which provided information about: what is sexuality and intimacy; how cancer and cancer treatment affects sexuality; the body and sex; sexuality across different stages of cancer; talking about sex and intimacy; information for partners and for single people; same-sex relationships; strategies for overcoming sexual concerns, including exploration of non-coital practices and intimacy; and support services available.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
294681
0
Health related quality of life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form (SF-12)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294681
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294681
0
Participants completed quantitative measures in a questionnaire pre-intervention at baseline, six weeks post-intervention and at three months follow-up.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
294682
0
Psychological wellbeing was measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
294682
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
294682
0
Participants completed quantitative measures in a questionnaire pre-intervention at baseline, six weeks post-intervention and at three months follow-up.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
294683
0
Sexual function was measured with the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
294683
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
294683
0
Participants completed quantitative measures in a questionnaire pre-intervention at baseline, six weeks post-intervention and at three months follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
313860
0
Relationship satisfaction was measured with the Brief Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
313860
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
313860
0
Participants completed quantitative measures in a questionnaire pre-intervention at baseline, six weeks post-intervention and at three months follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
313861
0
Sexual communication was assessed with the Dyadic Sexual Communication Scale (DSCS).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
313861
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
313861
0
Participants completed quantitative measures in a questionnaire pre-intervention at baseline, six weeks post-intervention and at three months follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
313862
0
Satisfaction with Sexual Relationship was assessed with a one-item measure that asked participants ‘how satisfied are you with your sexual relationship?’, on a 5-point Likert scale
Query!
Assessment method [3]
313862
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
313862
0
Participants completed quantitative measures in a questionnaire pre-intervention at baseline, six weeks post-intervention and at three months follow-up.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Self-nominated person with cancer, or the partner of a person with cancer who had experienced cancer related sexual concerns.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
None applied. No restrictions according cancer type, stage, treatments, time since diagnosis.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
In response to a study invitation, participants indicated whether they would like to be considered to take part in the evaluation of an intervention providing information about cancer related sexual changes. Those who agreed to take part were then randomly allocated to one of two conditions: self-help information only (SH), or information plus health professional consultation (HP). Randomization was stratified according to gender and cancer classification.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using coin-toss.
Allocation was not concealed.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
The SH and HP interventions were offered on a couple basis for those in a relationship, following previous suggestions that couple based interventions are most effective. However, in order to meet the needs of those who were single, or those who had partners who did not want to participate, the two interventions were also offered on an individual basis.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Using stratified random sampling of participants in Stage one (survey) of the of the ARC project who agree to take part in stage three (intervention), 160 participants, respectively (proportionally allocated per cancer type stratum) were allocated to each condition. Based upon 0.8 power calculations using a significance level of 0.01 to adjust for multiple comparisons, a sample size of 80 per condition is sufficient to allow for the detection of moderate clinical differences. Strata differentiated by cancer type, including both sexual and non-sexual cancers (prostrate/testicular; breast; gynaecological; other cancers).
Univariate analyses were conducted to compare participants in the two intervention conditions for each of the socio-demographic variables of interest separately for people with cancer (PWC) and partners of people with cancer (PPWC). For continuous variables, one-way ANOVA were conducted with intervention, participant type, or gender used as the grouping variable, and the chi square test for independence used for frequency data. Descriptive frequency analyses were used to examine baseline/follow-up retention rates across intervention conditions and participate type. Descriptive analyses examined program evaluation measures. To allow for dichotomous analysis and facilitate interpretation, ratings of program usefulness were recoded into ‘not useful’ and ‘useful (a little > extremely)’, reflecting the direction and meaning of the original Likert scales. The Fisher’s Exact Test (FET) was performed upon the categorical data associated with the perceived usefulness of the booklet in managing sexual changes and communication about sexual changes across the SH and HP intervention conditions. In these analyses, the FET calculates the exact probability of significant differences in the reported assignments of participants in the two intervention conditions. Independent sample t-tests were performed on outcome variables to assess baseline differences between the SH and HP intervention conditions according to participant type. A series of separate mixed repeated measures ANOVA were conducted on scores on each outcome variable across the three time conditions, pre-test, post-test and follow-up as the within-subjects variables, with intervention condition (SH or HP), participant type (PWC or PPWC), gender (men or women) and cancer type (sexual or non-sexual) as the between-subjects factors. An alpha level of .05 was used for all statistical tests.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/12/2010
Query!
Actual
7/12/2010
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/05/2011
Query!
Actual
8/06/2011
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
160
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
291018
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
291018
0
Australian Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
291018
0
GPO Box 2702. Canberra ACT 2601.
Query!
Country [1]
291018
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Professor Jane Ussher
Query!
Address
Centre for Health Research
School of Medicine
University of Western Sydney
Locked Bag 1797
Penrith NSW 2751
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289695
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
289695
0
Professor Janette Perz
Query!
Address [1]
289695
0
Centre for Health Research
School of Medicine
University of Western Sydney
Locked Bag 1797
Penrith NSW 2751
Query!
Country [1]
289695
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292601
0
University of Western Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292601
0
University of Western Sydney Locked Bag 1797 Penrith NSW 2751
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292601
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292601
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
292601
0
30/10/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292601
0
H6545
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Sexuality and intimacy are key aspects of quality of life detrimentally affected by cancer, resulting in significant reductions in well-being for people with cancer and their partners However, health professionals rarely address this important health problem, and little is known about the factors which predict difficulties or re-negotiation of sexuality post-cancer This study will examine the experience and construction of intimacy and sexuality post-cancer, from the perspective of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals, and elucidate pathways to difficulty or re-negotiation Based on these findings, programs of targeted couple interventions will be developed, and evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
56170
0
Prof Jane Ussher
Query!
Address
56170
0
Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine
University of Western Sydney
Locked Bag 1797
Penrith NSW 2751
Query!
Country
56170
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
56170
0
+61246203953
Query!
Fax
56170
0
Query!
Email
56170
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
56171
0
Jane Ussher
Query!
Address
56171
0
Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine
University of Western Sydney
Locked Bag 1797
Penrith NSW 2751
Query!
Country
56171
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
56171
0
+61246203953
Query!
Fax
56171
0
Query!
Email
56171
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
56172
0
Jane Ussher
Query!
Address
56172
0
Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine
University of Western Sydney
Locked Bag 1797
Penrith NSW 2751
Query!
Country
56172
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
56172
0
+61246203953
Query!
Fax
56172
0
Query!
Email
56172
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF