Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000974505
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/08/2015
Date registered
17/09/2015
Date last updated
7/08/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The Treatment Of BOoking Gestational diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) Pilot Study: Evaluating the impact on obstetric outcomes of immediate versus delayed care for gestational diabetes diagnosed at booking
Query!
Scientific title
Pilot study evaluating the impact on obstetric outcomes of immediate versus delayed care for gestational diabetes diagnosed at booking
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
287260
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
NIL
Query!
Trial acronym
TOBOGM Pilot
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Gestational diabetes
295878
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Metabolic and Endocrine
296131
296131
0
0
Query!
Diabetes
Query!
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
296200
296200
0
0
Query!
Antenatal care
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
1-delayed GDM care until 24-28 weeks if the repeat oral glucose tolerance test at that time still confirms GDM
2-GDM care involves standard management through the local diabetes service: this is identical to local GDM management in all respects including 1x2 hour education session, at least one dietetic session, take home information leaflets reflecting the education session content, food diary, self management including blood glucose monitoring, healthy eating and physical activity, regular clinic attendance with review of blood glucose monitoring and weight, standard obstetric management, pharmacological treatment as directed by the diabetes service staff.
3-attendance at clinic and associated education sessions and therapy will be recorded
Query!
Intervention code [1]
292563
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
standard care from booking (<20 weeks gestation)
GDM care involves standard management through the local diabetes service: this is identical to local GDM management in all respects including 1x2 hour education session, at least one dietetic session, take home information leaflets reflecting the education session content, food diary, self management including blood glucose monitoring, healthy eating and physical activity, regular clinic attendance with review of blood glucose monitoring and weight, standard obstetric management, pharmacological treatment as directed by the diabetes service staff.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
295805
0
Feasibility of study as assessed by the number of eligible participants recruited and lost to follow-up
Query!
Assessment method [1]
295805
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
295805
0
Birth
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
295874
0
Maternal: Composite of pre-eclampsia/PIH
This will be collected from the notes
Query!
Assessment method [2]
295874
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
295874
0
Birth
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
295875
0
Neonatal: 1-Pregnancy-Composite of 1 hour heelprick glucose =<2.2 mmol/l, respiratory distress, phototherapy, birth trauma, 5 min APGAR score <7, pre-term birth (<37 weeks), miscarriage/stillbirth/death, shoulder dystocia
These will be collected from the notes
Query!
Assessment method [3]
295875
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
295875
0
Birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
316573
0
Neonatal body mass compartments (fat mass, lean mass)
Derived from neonatal anthropometric measurements: Fetal lean body mass measured by the Catalano equation ie birthweight-fat mass, where fat mass=0.39055 (birthweight kg) + 0.0453 (flank skinfold mm)– 0.03237 (length cm)
Catalano PM et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Inadequate weight gain in overweight and obese pregnant women: what is the effect on fetal growth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:137.e1-7
Query!
Assessment method [1]
316573
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
316573
0
24-72 hours postnatal
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
316773
0
Customised centile for birthweight (large and small)
Derived from data from notes
Query!
Assessment method [2]
316773
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
316773
0
birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
316774
0
mean upper arm circumference
measured 24-72 hours postnatal
Query!
Assessment method [3]
316774
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
316774
0
24-72 hours postnatal
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
316775
0
severe hypoglycaemia (heelprick glucose <1.6 mmol/l)
derived from notes
Query!
Assessment method [4]
316775
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
316775
0
at any point up to 72 hours after birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
316776
0
neonatal intensive care unit bed days
from notes
Query!
Assessment method [5]
316776
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
316776
0
at any point up to 28 days after birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
316777
0
sum of neonatal callipers
measured using callipers
Query!
Assessment method [6]
316777
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
316777
0
24-72 hours postnatal
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
316778
0
maternal gestational weight gain.
measured using seca scales
Query!
Assessment method [7]
316778
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
316778
0
End point is 36-38 weeks gestation
Baseline measure is from initial weight measurement on entry into the study
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
316779
0
Caesarean section
from notes
Query!
Assessment method [8]
316779
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
316779
0
birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
316780
0
induction of labour
from notes
Query!
Assessment method [9]
316780
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
316780
0
birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
316781
0
maternal hypoglycaemia
from meter downloads
Query!
Assessment method [10]
316781
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
316781
0
birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
316782
0
perineal trauma
from notes
Query!
Assessment method [11]
316782
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
316782
0
birth
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
316783
0
breast feeding
questionnaire designed for this study
Query!
Assessment method [12]
316783
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
316783
0
6-12 weeks postnatal
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
316784
0
Quality of life using EQ5D within questionnaires
Query!
Assessment method [13]
316784
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
316784
0
28weeks gestation, 6-12 weeks postnatal
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Pregnant women (aged >=18years) with a singleton pregnancy between 4 and 19+6 weeks’ gestation, attending the hospital Book in clinic, with a risk factor for GDM warranting an OGTT according to ADIPS/local guidelines. Ability to read and understand English for consent purposes.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Existing diabetes, inability to give consent, twins or triplets (or more), major active medical disorders (eg psychiatric disease requiring antipsychotic medication), women without a GDM risk factor, women >=20 weeks gestation
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
allocation involved contacting the holder of the allocation schedule who was “off-site”
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
electronic randomisation (SPSS)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
All women recruited will have an OGTT
Women with GDM will be randomised to referral or 'not for referral to GDM clinic'
women without GDM will also receive the advice 'not for referral to GDM clinic'
The delayed treatment group will therefore be hidden among normal 'decoys'
All women who have not been referred to the GDM clinic will have an OGTT at 24-28 weeks
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
This is a pilot study.
Analyses will be by intention to treat with a per protocol sensitivity analysis. Data analysis will involve computations of Fisher’s exact tests (for dichotomous outcome measures), Chi-square tests (for categorical data with >2 levels) and ANOVA (for continuous measures). Data will be described using 95% confidence intervals. The SAP will include a priori protocols for withdrawal, distributional transformations, outliers, methods for handling drop outs, any model assumptions including incorporation of covariates into analyses and handling of multiple comparisons.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
4/08/2015
Query!
Actual
4/08/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/10/2015
Query!
Actual
7/04/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/12/2016
Query!
Actual
31/12/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
100
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
4186
0
Campbelltown Hospital - Campbelltown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
10100
0
2560 - Campbelltown
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
291822
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
291822
0
University of Western Sydney
Query!
Address [1]
291822
0
University of Western Sydney
School of Medicine
Campbelltown Campus Building 30
Narellan Road, Campbelltown
NSW 2560
Query!
Country [1]
291822
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Western Sydney
Query!
Address
University of Western Sydney
School of Medicine
Campbelltown Campus Building 30
Narellan Road, Campbelltown
NSW 2560
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
290485
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
290485
0
Campbelltown Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
290485
0
Therry Road
Campbelltown NSW 2560
Query!
Country [1]
290485
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
293340
0
South West Sydney LHD
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
293340
0
Liverpool Hospital Eastern Campus Corner of Lachlan and Hart Streets Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
293340
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
293340
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
293340
0
09/03/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
293340
0
hrec/15/lpool/14
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
There is currently no randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence that treating gestational diabetes (GDM) prior to 24-28 weeks gestation benefits babies or their mothers, and there is potential for harm through fetal undernutrition, inappropriately medicalising some pregnancies, and increasing overall clinical workload. We are planning an RCT testing whether GDM treatment from <20 weeks gestation (‘booking GDM’) is associated with benefit or harm. This pilot study aims to have midwives and women with GDM risk factors review the study plan and to pilot the study procedures. The pilot is a full RCT of 100 women, 20 of whom are expected to have GDM.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
1. D Simmons, J Nema, L Vizza, A Robertson, R Dahlal, R Rajagopal. Treatment of booking gestational diabetes the TOBOGM pilot randomized controlled trial. Diabetes UK Professional Conference © 2017 Diabetes UK. Diabetic Medicine 34 (Suppl s1), 36-194 2. David Simmons, Jodie Nema, Annette Robertson, Raymond Dalal, Rohit Rajagopa. Treatment of Booking Gestational diabetes Mellitus: The ToBOGM Pilot. ADS & ADEA Annual Scientific Meeting, 2016 Gold Coast.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
59458
0
Prof David Simmons
Query!
Address
59458
0
University of Western Sydney
Campbelltown, New South Wales 2560
Query!
Country
59458
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
59458
0
+61437961795
Query!
Fax
59458
0
Query!
Email
59458
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
59459
0
David Simmons
Query!
Address
59459
0
University of Western Sydney
Campbelltown, New South Wales 2560
Query!
Country
59459
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
59459
0
+61437961795
Query!
Fax
59459
0
Query!
Email
59459
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
59460
0
David Simmons
Query!
Address
59460
0
Campbelltown Campus
Locked Bag 1797
NSW 2560
Query!
Country
59460
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
59460
0
+61437961795
Query!
Fax
59460
0
Query!
Email
59460
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
Type
Is Peer Reviewed?
DOI
Citations or Other Details
Attachment
Plain language summary
No
An RCT deferring ‘Booking GDM’ treatment is feasib...
[
More Details
]
Study results article
Yes
282. Simmons D, Nema J, Parton C, Vizza L, Roberts...
[
More Details
]
369100-(Uploaded-02-06-2020-09-55-51)-Journal results publication.pdf
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Early screening and treatment of gestational diabetes in high-risk women improves maternal and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective clinical audit.
2018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.09.013
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF