Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617000076370
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/11/2016
Date registered
13/01/2017
Date last updated
19/02/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Validation of a novel algorithm for dynamic assessment of fluid challenge: a multicentric study
Query!
Scientific title
Validation of a novel algorithm for dynamic assessment of fluid challenge: a multicentric study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
290358
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hypotension
300647
0
Query!
Hypoperfusion
300648
0
Query!
Acute circulatory failure
300649
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
300493
300493
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Cardiovascular
300494
300494
0
0
Query!
Other cardiovascular diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Fluid challenge consisting in 500 ml of intravenous crystalloids (both saline 0,9% or Ringer Acetate or Lactate were allowed), administered in 10 minutes.
The Fluid challenge is administered by the attending physician to correct hemodynamic instability.
All the patients received hemodynamic monitoring with the MostCare system which provides all the hemodynamic variables evaluated in the study before and after fluid challenge administration (cardiac output, stroke volume, arterial elastance (Ea), cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE)).
In a previous pilot study a model including baseline pulse pressure variation, the variation of systolic arterial pressure - dicrotic pressure and CCE showed the greater AUC (0.92), and correctly identified the efficacy of FC in 87% of patients (84.2% of responders and 92.5 of non-responders). The following formula describes this latter model:
0.039+1.042*(DELTASAP- Pdic 5min)+1.278* DELTACCE5min+1.159*PPVbaseline
Query!
Intervention code [1]
296172
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The pulse pressure variation, a dynamic index of fluid responsiveness, has been considered as the gold standard. Off line evaluation of PPV before and after the fluid challenge was the used as control treatment
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
300145
0
To consider the fluid responsiveness (i.e increase in cardiac index after fluid challenge administration) of the patient by means of model application. Fluid responsiveness is assessed by means of Mostcare system and is defined as the increase of at least 15% of the cardiac index after the infusion of a fluid challenge of 500 ml of crystalloids in 10 minutes.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300145
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300145
0
Minutes 1 2 3 4 5 after fluid challenge infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
329189
0
To compare the area under the curve (AUC) of the model with the AUC of baseline pulse pressure variation.
The ROC curve is calculated considering the variations of the hemodynamic parameters assessed by means of Mostcare system and the response to fluid administration.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
329189
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
329189
0
Minutes 1 2 3 4 5 after fluid challenge infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
343342
0
Updating timing of hemodynamic assessment.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
343342
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
343342
0
10 - 15 and 30 minutes after fluid challenge infusion
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Group 1 (ICU septic) and 2 (ICU non septic): Acute circulatory failure defined by a systolic arterial pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg (or fall of systolic arterial pressure higher or equal to 50 mm Hg in known hypertensive patients) and one or more of the following signs: 1) urinary flow less than or equal to 0.5 mL/kg/min for greater than or equal to 2 hours, 2) tachycardia greater than or equal to 100 bpm, or 3) presence of skin mottling.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
For ICU group the exclusion criteria are: 1) New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, or severe valvular diseases, or right ventricle systolic dysfunction; 2) cardiac arrhythmias; 3) severe ARDS (4); 4) haemodialysis or continuous hemofiltration; 5) any condition affecting arterial waveform including acute/chronic aortic dissection, thoracic outlet syndrome, subclavian artery stenosis and uncorrected under- or over-damping of the pressure thransducer.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
The study will enrolled 2 groups of patients: Group 1, ICU septic patients; Group 2, ICU non septic patients
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The sample size is calculated by means of non-inferiority ROC comparison approach.
Considering the AUC of pulse pressure variation at baseline for ICU patients ventilated with less than 8 ml/kg as high as 0.70, according to the literature, and expecting and AUC of at least 0.80 for the model including the considered hemodynamic variables (82 patients)
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2017
Query!
Actual
1/07/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
82
Query!
Accrual to date
60
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
8334
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [1]
8334
0
Piedmont
Query!
Country [2]
8335
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [2]
8335
0
Spain
Query!
Country [3]
8336
0
France
Query!
State/province [3]
8336
0
France
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
294742
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
294742
0
Antonio Messina
Query!
Address [1]
294742
0
Corso Mazzini, 18 28100 Novara
Query!
Country [1]
294742
0
Italy
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
antonio messina
Query!
Address
AOU Maggiore della Carita'
Corso Mazzini, 18
28100 Novara (NO)
Intensive care unit
Query!
Country
Italy
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
293591
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
293591
0
Stefano Romagnoli
Query!
Address [1]
293591
0
AOU Careggi
Largo G. Alessandro Brambilla, 3, 50134
Firenze
Italy
Query!
Country [1]
293591
0
Italy
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
296159
0
Comitato etico Interaziendale AOU Maggiore della Carita'
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
296159
0
Corso Mazzini, 18 28100 Novara (NO)
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
296159
0
Italy
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
296159
0
10/11/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
296159
0
19/12/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
296159
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a multi centric study aiming to test the reliability of a novel algorithm including the analysis of baseline pulse pressure variation (PPV), cardicac cycle efficiecy (CCE) and the difference between systolic pressure and dicrotic pressure (SAP-Pdic). In a previous pilot trial we found that this dynamic approach could predict the outcome of a fluid challenge better than purely baseline assessment of PPV. This could spare inappropriate fluid administration in those patient who should not receive fluid despite hemodynamic instability. To test our hypothesis will be studied 2 groups of patients in ICU (septic and non septic patients). All the patients will receive fluid as part of standard care and all the hemodynamic variables will be recorded by means of MostCare system. The reliability of the model will be evaluated post hoc (after fluid administration), and compared to the PPV value before fluid administration.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Attachments [1]
1189
1189
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/371685-Algoritmo.docx
(Supplementary information)
Query!
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
69798
0
Dr antonio messina
Query!
Address
69798
0
AOU Maggiore della Carita'
Corso Mazzini, 18
28100 Novara (NO)
Query!
Country
69798
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
69798
0
+393498666281
Query!
Fax
69798
0
+393498666281
Query!
Email
69798
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
69799
0
antonio messina
Query!
Address
69799
0
AOU Maggiore della Carita'
Corso Mazzini, 18
28100 Novara (NO)
Query!
Country
69799
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
69799
0
+393498666281
Query!
Fax
69799
0
+393498666281
Query!
Email
69799
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
69800
0
antonio messina
Query!
Address
69800
0
AOU Maggiore della Carita'
Corso Mazzini, 18
28100 Novara (NO)
Query!
Country
69800
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
69800
0
+393498666281
Query!
Fax
69800
0
+393498666281
Query!
Email
69800
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Multivariable haemodynamic approach to predict the fluid challenge response: A multicentre cohort study.
2021
https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001289
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF