Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617001102369
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
24/01/2017
Date registered
28/07/2017
Date last updated
1/12/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
9/07/2019
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Health Technology Assessment of the Clarity Autoscan system: Motion correction and margin reduction in the radiation therapy treatment of prostate cancer
Query!
Scientific title
Health Technology Assessment of the Clarity Autoscan system: Motion correction and margin reduction in the radiation therapy treatment of prostate cancer
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
291001
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1191-969
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
prostate cancer
301771
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
301461
301461
0
0
Query!
Prostate
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The Clarity Autoscan ultrasound system allows radiation therapists to track the position of the prostate in real time by the application of an ultrasound probe against the perineum during treatment delivery daily. An alert is generated if the prostate moves beyond a pre-specified parameter, allowing the radiation therapist to suspend treatment and take
corrective action to ensure accuracy is maintained. The Clarity Autoscan system is non-invasive and does not utilise any additional radiation. In this study, all patients (both control and intervention groups) will have fiducial markers inserted as per standard practice, in addition to the Clarity Autoscan monitoring.
In the radiation therapy treatment of the prostate with Clarity Autoscan, the margin around the prostate for treatment delivery will be reduced to 5mm (with 3mm in the posterior). The prostate shall be monitored for any motion using ultrasound by qualified radiation therapists during treatment delivery, and if it moves greater than the defined margin (i.e. 5mm, with 3mm in the posterior), the treatment will be paused and the patient position corrected for. This will occur for all daily treatments (up to 39).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
296965
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
298727
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
All patients (control and intervention) will have both fiducial markers inserted and Clarity Autoscan for radiation therapy treatment. The control group will be treated with a margin around the prostate of 10mm (with 7mm in the posterior). The prostate shall be monitored for any motion using ultrasound by qualified radiation therapists during treatment delivery, and if it moves greater than the defined margin (i.e. 10mm, with 7mm in the posterior), the treatment will be paused and the patient position corrected for. This will occur for all daily treatments (up to 39).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
300858
0
Presence of side effects during radiation therapy treatment and at follow up after radiation therapy treatment completion. This will be assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) gradings. Side effects (such as urinary incontinence/retention, nocturia, proctitis, diarrheoa) will be assessed through patient interview, physical examination and medical/pathology tests as required. This will be completed by the radiation oncologist or registrar at weekly treatment review appointments and follow up appointments, and entered into MOSAIQ oncology information system.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300858
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300858
0
Baseline; every 2 weeks while on treatment (8-9 weeks total); post radiation therapy treatment follow up at 3-month, 6-month, 12-month, and annually up to 5-years.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
331057
0
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of reduced margins against standard margins, with comparison to other existing intrafraction technologies. This will be assessed through a Health utilisation questionnaire completed by the patient, and hospital chart records to ascertain costs. This questionnaire has been designed by the investigators specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
331057
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
331057
0
At one year follow up (after completion of radiation therapy treatment).
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
331058
0
To explore the patient acceptance of Clarity (with respect to pain/invasiveness). This will be assessed through a "Procedures Experience" questionnaire, where patients rate various aspects of both procedures (such as pain, discomfort, embarrassment) on a likert scale. Additionally, patients will be invited to participate in a qualitative semi-structured interview. This questionnaire has been designed by the investigators specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
331058
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
331058
0
Within 1 week of treatment commencement
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
337343
0
To explore patient preference for prostate motion monitoring – a once-off surgically
invasive insertion procedure, or a daily non-invasive but potentially personally invasive
procedure for 39 treatments. This will be assessed through responses and themes emerging from the qualitative semi-structured interviews.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
337343
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
337343
0
Within 1 week of treatment commencement.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Histological confirmed malignant neoplasm of the prostate
2. Presenting to Townsville Cancer Centre for radiation therapy treatment from March 2017
3. Suitable for fiducial marker implantation and Clarity tracking capabilities
4. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 2 or
less
5. Has provided written Informed Consent for participation in this study
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Evidence of distant metastases
2. Major concurrent physical or psychiatric illness which would prevent completion of treatment or adequate follow-up either through disablement or limitation of life expectancy to less than 1 year.
3. Cognition, language or literacy difficulties which would prevent the completion of QOL and other questionnaires.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Block randomisation with a ratio of 1:1, generated through a computerised sequence generation.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Extrapolation from similar research where interventions have increased accuracy and/or reduced rectal dose indicates that a reduction in toxicity greater than or equal to 2 of 20% in the intervention group relative to the control group is realistic 16–18. With 90%CI and alpha = 0.05, a total of 260 participants will be required to demonstrate this reduction in toxicity of 20% in the intervention group relative to the control group (Altman 1991). The sample size for this study will be calculated again after the completion of the first 20 patients’ treatment because of the lack of prior data on which to calculate size. This will allow for the collation of acute toxicity data, which will more accurately inform the sample size. It will again be revisited at 50 patients to ensure appropriateness, with power calculated based on the 50 patients’ data.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/07/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/07/2020
Query!
Actual
7/01/2020
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
15/04/2021
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
260
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
56
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
7386
0
The Townsville Hospital - Douglas
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
15179
0
4814 - Douglas
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
295427
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
295427
0
Townsville Hospital and Health Service
Query!
Address [1]
295427
0
PO BOX 670
Townsville Qld 4810
Query!
Country [1]
295427
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
The Townsville Hospital
Query!
Address
PO BOX 670
Townsville Qld 4810
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
294247
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
294247
0
Query!
Address [1]
294247
0
Query!
Country [1]
294247
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
296759
0
Townsville Hospital and Health Service HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
296759
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
296759
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
296759
0
20/01/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
296759
0
09/03/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
296759
0
HREC/17/QTHS/9
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
298281
0
James Cook University Human Ethics Research Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
298281
0
James Cook University Douglas, QLD 4811
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
298281
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
298281
0
14/04/2017
Query!
Approval date [2]
298281
0
08/05/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
298281
0
H6970
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety, clinical outcomes, patient preferences and economic benefits of reduced margins for radiation therapy for prostate cancer, with the use of the Clarity Autoscan ultrasound system. Who is it for? You may be eligible to participate in this trial if you are aged 50 or over and have been diagnosed with prostate cancer, for which you are scheduled to commence radiation therapy treatment. Study details All participants enrolled in this trial will be randomly allocated (by chance) to receive either a reduced margin around the prostate during radiation therapy of 3-5mm, or to receive the standard margin of 7-10mm. All patients, regardless of allocation will have fiducial markers inserted prior to commencement of treatment, and will have the Clarity Autoscan ultrasound monitoring prostate motion throughout treatment, increasing the accuracy of treatment. The allocated treatment protocol will continue for all radiation therapy treatment sessions (up to 39). Researchers will ask participants for their preference regarding monitoring during radiotherapy, and the acceptability of the Clarity Autoscan system. Participants will also be followed up for up to five years post treatment to assess side effects and for one year to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the motion monitoring. It is hoped that the findings from this trial can be used to inform a health technology assessment reviewing the safety, efficacy and cost-efficacy of reduced margins during radiotherapy for prostate cancer using the Clarity Autoscan system.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
71974
0
Mrs Amy Brown
Query!
Address
71974
0
PO Box 670
The Townsville Hospital
Townsville, Qld, 4810
Query!
Country
71974
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71974
0
+61 7 4433 1600
Query!
Fax
71974
0
Query!
Email
71974
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
71975
0
Amy Brown
Query!
Address
71975
0
PO Box 670
The Townsville Hospital
Townsville, Qld, 4810
Query!
Country
71975
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71975
0
+61 7 4433 1600
Query!
Fax
71975
0
Query!
Email
71975
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
71976
0
Amy Brown
Query!
Address
71976
0
PO Box 670
The Townsville Hospital
Townsville, Qld, 4810
Query!
Country
71976
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71976
0
+61 7 4433 1600
Query!
Fax
71976
0
Query!
Email
71976
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Individual data not available
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
2803
Study protocol
[email protected]
2804
Ethical approval
[email protected]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF