Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617000508370
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
5/04/2017
Date registered
7/04/2017
Date last updated
10/04/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Effect of speed of processing training on older driver screening measures
Query!
Scientific title
Effect of speed of processing training on older driver screening measures
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
291622
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Driving safety
302744
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Other
302261
302261
0
0
Query!
Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Self-administered home-based, computerised speed of processing training using online commercial product "Double Decision" in the BrainHQ suite of cognitive training software. Double Decision involves viewing a scene on the computer and identifying an image that appears briefly at the centre of the scene (either a car or truck). At the same time, the participant must also note the location of a briefly appearing peripheral figure at one of eight possible locations around the central image. During training, the speed of presentation of the images is adaptively reduced (between 500ms and 17ms), depending on the participant's accuracy, and the background is made more visually complex. Training on the Double Decision task results in participants becoming faster at accurately identifying and locating the images. Participants allocated to the intervention arm were asked to complete 10 hours of training over 5 weeks, at 2 hours per week. Researchers conducted weekly phone follow-up of each participant during the intervention in order to provide technical and motivational support. The phone follow-ups were also aimed at maintaining adherence to the intervention, with the researcher using basic motivational techniques such as encouraging training, normalising difficulties, providing advice regarding impediments to training, and reinforcing importance.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
297695
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No contact (no treatment) control participants
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
301676
0
change in speed of processing on Useful Field of View test (UFOV)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
301676
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
301676
0
at completion of 5weeks (or 10hrs) training (or matched test-retest interval for control group)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
333535
0
Trail Making Test B
Query!
Assessment method [1]
333535
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
333535
0
at completion of 5weeks (or 10hrs) training (or matched test-retest interval period for control group)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
333536
0
Maze Test (part of OT-DORA battery)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
333536
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
333536
0
at completion of 5weeks (or 10hrs) training (or matched test-retest interval for controls)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
333537
0
Hazard Perception Test
Query!
Assessment method [3]
333537
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
333537
0
at completion of 5weeks (or 10hrs) training (or matched test-retest interval for controls)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
333538
0
Colour Choice reaction time test "Cars RT" (part of Multi-D battery)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
333538
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
333538
0
at completion of 5weeks (or 10hrs) training (or matched test-retest interval for controls)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
333539
0
visual motion sensitivity "Dot motion test" (part of Multi-D battery)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
333539
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
333539
0
at completion of 5weeks (or 10hrs) training (or matched test-retest interval for controls)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
333540
0
DriveSafe Intersection knowledge test
Query!
Assessment method [6]
333540
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
333540
0
at completion of 5weeks (or 10hrs) training (or matched test-retest interval for controls)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
333541
0
Road law knowledge test (part of OT-DORA battery)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
333541
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
333541
0
at completion of 5weeks (or 10hrs) training (or matched test-retest interval for controls)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
current full driver’s license
aged over 65
Query!
Minimum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
history of neurological, psychiatric or major medical illness
history of health issues that may be impacted by regular computer usage (e.g., 2 hours per week for 5 weeks)
no access to a home computer with internet connection
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/12/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
31/03/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/05/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
53
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
295509
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
295509
0
ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research
Query!
Address [1]
295509
0
University of New South Wales (Administering Organisation)
UNSW Business School
Level 3, East Wing
223 Anzac Parade
Kensington NSW 2033
Query!
Country [1]
295509
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
296116
0
Government body
Query!
Name [2]
296116
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
Query!
Address [2]
296116
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
GPO Box 1421
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [2]
296116
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Australian National University
Query!
Address
Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing
Research School of Population Health
Building 54, Mills Road
Australian National University
Acton, ACT 0200
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
295013
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
295013
0
Query!
Address [1]
295013
0
Query!
Country [1]
295013
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
296836
0
Human Research Ethics Committee, Australian National University
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
296836
0
Research Integrity & Compliance Research Services Division Level 2, Birch Building 36 Science Road, ANU The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
296836
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
296836
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
296836
0
02/01/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
296836
0
2012/322
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Computerised training for cognitive enhancement is of great public interest, however, there is as yet insufficient data on whether, and how, such training leads to changes in everyday activity that relies on the trained cognitive function. Speed of processing training is a commercial software that has been examined in a number of large trials, particularly in the context of ageing and driving safety. This pilot study aims to examine whether online speed of processing training in healthy older drivers will lead to improvement in other measures known to be associated with driving safety.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
72178
0
Prof Kaarin Anstey
Query!
Address
72178
0
Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing
The Australian National University
Building 54 Mills Road, Acton, ACT 0200
Query!
Country
72178
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
72178
0
+61 2 6125 8410
Query!
Fax
72178
0
Query!
Email
72178
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
72179
0
Ranmalee Eramudugolla
Query!
Address
72179
0
Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing
The Australian National University
Building 54 Mills Road, Acton, ACT 0200
Query!
Country
72179
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
72179
0
+61 2 6125 1456
Query!
Fax
72179
0
Query!
Email
72179
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
72180
0
Ranmalee Eramudugolla
Query!
Address
72180
0
Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing
The Australian National University
Building 54 Mills Road, Acton, ACT 0200
Query!
Country
72180
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
72180
0
+61 2 6125 1456
Query!
Fax
72180
0
Query!
Email
72180
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF