Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618001330235
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
24/07/2018
Date registered
7/08/2018
Date last updated
7/08/2018
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Suicide Prevention Education for the Public: How effective is Addressing the Bystander Effect through the Bystander Intervention Model in increasing knowledge, confidence and intent to intervene?
Query!
Scientific title
The Efficacy of Online Suicide Prevention Education for the Public Addressing the Bystander Effect through the Bystander Intervention Model in increasing knowledge, confidence and intent to intervene: An RCT.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
295650
0
Nil known.
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1217-9666
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Suicide.
308986
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
307889
307889
0
0
Query!
Suicide
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The intervention is Bystander Intervention Model (BIM)-informed suicide prevention education material. This material is a PDF factsheet teaching participants about suicide risk factors, warning signs and protective factors and teaching them how to intervene. This is provided in the online questionnaire of this study. Participants are provided with a link to the online questionnaire in the study advertisement. The questionnaire presents the following information in order: demographics, 'Bystander Intervention Model Performance Scale' (BIMPS), hypothetical scenario of someone presenting with suicide risk, 'Confidence and Intent to Intervene Scale' (CITIS), education PDF, BIMPS time 2, CITIS time 2, Manipulation Check Questions asking how much the education information aligned with the BIM, debrief page. The total questionnaire takes approx. 30-45 min to complete.
As stated, the intervention is only delivered once during the overall questionnaire. Adherence is assessed through timing how long participants spend on reading the page.
This factsheet was designed specifically for this study based on evidence-based, best practice guidelines in suicide risk assessment and intervention.
The factsheet is 8 pages - mostly graphics and bullet points - taking approx 10 min to read.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
301965
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
This group will receive suicide prevention education material which is NOT BIM-informed and based on currently available information and delivered as above.
This sheet is compiled from readily available resources for the public from RUOK? and Sane: https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/22b3e3c9/files/uploaded/RUOK_MobileTipSheet_HowToAsk_265x470_V1%5B2%5D.pdf
https://www.sane.org/mental-health-and-illness/facts-and-guides/fvm-mental-illness-basics
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
306862
0
Mean Bystander Intervention Model Performance Scale Score. This is an adapted measure from a previously validated measure which assessed self-reproted bystander intervention in persons exposed to a scenario involving witnessing bullying or sexual harassment. This measure was adapted to suit a scenario of suicide risk. The adapted measure was assessed for reliability and validity in the current study. With a sample of 281 participants, it was found to have good internal consistency and convergent validity.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
306862
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
306862
0
Immediately Pre-intervention.
Immediately Post-intervention (primary endpoint).
6-month follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
349965
0
Mean Confidence and Intent to Intervene Scale Score.
This scale was specifically designed for the currents study to assess participants' level of confidence and intent to intervene in a hypothetical scenario involving suicide risk. It was assessed for reliability and validity in the current study. With a sample of 281 participants, it was found to have good internal consistency and convergent validity.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
349965
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
349965
0
Immediately Pre-intervention.
Immediately Post-intervention.
6-month follow-up.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Males and females from general adult population.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Previous bereavement by suicide.
Distressed by topic of suicide.
Personal suicide ideation.
Aged under 18 years.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation by computer.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation by computer.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
This study required a minimum 64 participants per group to gain sufficient power (optimally .80) and a large effect size (optimally a Cohen’s d of .50) at alpha .05 (Cohen, 1992). As the study involved factor analysis however, the study aimed to recruit at least 300 participants for robust analysis and interpretation. SPSS was used to analysis quantitative data exported from qualtrics.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
3/07/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
31/12/2017
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/06/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
300
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
281
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
300230
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
300230
0
Australian Catholic Univeristy
Query!
Address [1]
300230
0
1100 Nudgee Rd
Banyo QLD 4014
Query!
Country [1]
300230
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Australian Catholic University
Query!
Address
1100 Nudgee Rd
Banyo QLD 4014
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
299645
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
299645
0
Karien Hill
Query!
Address [1]
299645
0
Australian Catholic University
1100 Nudgee Rd
Banyo QLD 4014
Query!
Country [1]
299645
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
301053
0
ACU Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
301053
0
1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo 4014
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
301053
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
301053
0
03/04/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
301053
0
28/04/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
301053
0
2016-281E
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a BIM-guided factsheet about suicide prevention can improve participants’ knowledge, confidence and intent to intervene more than a standard condition when presented with a peer at risk of suicide. HYPOTHESIS: A public suicide prevention strategy which addresses the BIM will be more effective at increasing knowledge, confidence and intent to intervene when presented with someone at risk of suicide than a standard condition which does not address the BIM.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
85722
0
Dr Carina Chan
Query!
Address
85722
0
Australian Catholic University
1100 Nudgee Rd
Banyo 4014
Query!
Country
85722
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
85722
0
+61 7 3861 6093
Query!
Fax
85722
0
Query!
Email
85722
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
85723
0
Karien Hill
Query!
Address
85723
0
Australian Catholic University
1100 Nudgee Rd
Banyo QLD 4014
Query!
Country
85723
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
85723
0
+61402 437 210
Query!
Fax
85723
0
Query!
Email
85723
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
85724
0
Karien Hill
Query!
Address
85724
0
Australian Catholic University
1100 Nudgee Rd
Banyo QLD 4014
Query!
Country
85724
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
85724
0
+61402 437 210
Query!
Fax
85724
0
Query!
Email
85724
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF