Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618001788268
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
16/10/2018
Date registered
1/11/2018
Date last updated
1/11/2018
Date data sharing statement initially provided
1/11/2018
Date results provided
1/11/2018
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Frova Intubation Catheter with the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Intubating Adult Patients with Difficult Airways
Query!
Scientific title
Randomized clinical trial compared Frova intubation catheter and McGrath videolaryngoscope according to the ratio of successful intubation at the primary attempt in difficult intubation adult patients
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
296350
0
'None'
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1222-4272
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
difficult intubation
310073
0
Query!
airway management
310074
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
308825
308825
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Emergency medicine
308826
308826
0
0
Query!
Other emergency care
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients were undergoing elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation, and had been involved in at least one intubation attempt that had been deemed unsuccessful and was performed by an anaesthetist who has at least three years of experience were randomized to tracheal intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope (size 3 blade in females; size 4 in males) used with the Frova intubation catheter (Group F) or the McGrath VL (Group V). In cases when intubations could not be carried out with the chosen device at the third attempt by an anaesthetist with at least three years of experience, the device was considered to be unsuccessful and intubation was attempted with the second device. When this method also proved unsuccessful, airway management based upon the difficult airway algorithm was maintained. As a third method, the combined use of both devices or intubation with a fibreoptic bronchoscope was preferred.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
312682
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Macintosh laryngoscope + McGrath Videolaryngoscope is the comparator intervention devices.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
307801
0
The primary outcome was the rate of successful intubation at the first attempt using the frova intubation catheter and Mc Grath videolaryngoscope.
During the intubation attempt whether the chosen device was successful or not will be recorded. The successful intubation process will be verified with capnography when the endotracheal tube place to the lungs.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
307801
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
307801
0
The time needed to verify the successful intubation process with capnography (i.e.:data-linkage to medical records)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
352960
0
'Laryngoscopy time' : time needed to intubate,
Query!
Assessment method [1]
352960
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
352960
0
The time needed to intubate will accounted with stopwatch till end tidal karbondioxide seen on the anaesthesia machine.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
353170
0
Pressure applied to the tooth.
Observable injury to the tooth will be listed.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
353170
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
353170
0
The time to checking the tooth injury by observation after verifying the successful intubation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
353171
0
Any complications resulting from intubation.
The smallest arterial oxygen saturation pending or soon afterwards the intubation attempt; the event of little complications (i.e., observable injury to lip or oral mucosa or blood over laryngoscope); or the occurrence of spasm during extubation will be recorded.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
353171
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
353171
0
The time after verifying the successful intubation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
353172
0
Laryngoscopic view using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score,
Query!
Assessment method [4]
353172
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
353172
0
The time to evaluate by observation after verifying the successful intubation.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
We studied 50 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–III patients, aged 18-65. These cases were undergoing elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation and general anaesthesia, and had been involved in at least one intubation attempt that had been deemed unsuccessful and was performed by an anaesthetist who has at least three years of experience.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients who were pregnant, emergency cases, those younger than 18 years, those who had gastroesophageal reflux and delayed gastric emptying, and patients with severe pulmonary disease were excluded.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The allocation sequence was generated by random number tables, and the allocation concealed in sealed envelopes, which were not opened until patient consent had been obtained
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Data and information obtained in the present research were evaluated handling SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 17.0). To evaluate the datum, additionally detailed statistical techniques (mean and standard deviation), cross tabulations were used. In the comparison of quantitative data, an independent two-sample t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and a chi-square test were employed. All detections were assessed at a 95% confidence interval and a p< 0.05 significance level.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/01/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/08/2017
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/08/2017
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
49
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
20937
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [1]
20937
0
Selcuklu
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
300954
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
300954
0
Selcuk University
Query!
Address [1]
300954
0
Selcuk University Alaaddin Keykubat Campus, Istanbul Street, Yazir District, Scientific Research Office, Selcuklu, Konya, 42100.
Query!
Country [1]
300954
0
Turkey
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Selcuk University
Query!
Address
Selcuk University Alaaddin Keykubat Campus, Istanbul Street, Yazir District, Scientific Research Office, Selcuklu, Konya, 42100.
Query!
Country
Turkey
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
300590
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
300590
0
Query!
Address [1]
300590
0
Query!
Country [1]
300590
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
301720
0
Selcuk University Medical Faculty Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
301720
0
Selcuk University Alaaddin Keykubat Campus, Istanbul Street, Yazir District, Medical Faculty Ethics Committee, Selcuklu, Konya, 42100.
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
301720
0
Turkey
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
301720
0
25/12/2014
Query!
Approval date [1]
301720
0
06/01/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
301720
0
-050.01.04/
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Difficult airway is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients who will undergo surgical intervention. Therefore, many devices and algorithms have been developed for the management of difficult airway. This prospective randomized clinical trial compared two methods of difficult intubation, one using the Frova intubation catheter and the other using a non-channelled McGrath videolaryngoscope.49 patients who have ASA score I-III and who will undergo optional operation under general anesthesia and whom airway management process was difficult cases were involved in the research.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Attachments [1]
3173
3173
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/376205-convert-jpg-to-pdf.net_2018-10-16_14-41-03.pdf
(Ethics approval)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [2]
3174
3174
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/376205-ay.pdf
(Supplementary information)
Query!
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
87878
0
Prof Ozkan Onal
Query!
Address
87878
0
Selcuk University Alaaddin Keykubat Campus, Istanbul Street, Yazir District, Medical Faculty Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Selcuklu, Konya, 42100.
Query!
Country
87878
0
Turkey
Query!
Phone
87878
0
+905059052252
Query!
Fax
87878
0
Query!
Email
87878
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
87879
0
Ozkan Onal
Query!
Address
87879
0
Selcuk University Alaaddin Keykubat Campus, Istanbul Street, Yazir District, Medical Faculty Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Selcuklu, Konya, 42100.
Query!
Country
87879
0
Turkey
Query!
Phone
87879
0
+905059052252
Query!
Fax
87879
0
Query!
Email
87879
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
87880
0
Ozkan Onal
Query!
Address
87880
0
Selcuk University Alaaddin Keykubat Campus, Istanbul Street, Yazir District, Medical Faculty Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Selcuklu, Konya, 42100.
Query!
Country
87880
0
Turkey
Query!
Phone
87880
0
+905059052252
Query!
Fax
87880
0
Query!
Email
87880
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Undecided
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
We have collected the patients datas and if we have time to input the patients datas' we will input them.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
62
Ethical approval
376205-(Uploaded-31-10-2018-20-23-38)-Study-related document.jpg
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF