Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000234112
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
12/02/2019
Date registered
18/02/2019
Date last updated
8/08/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
18/02/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Enhancing Treatment for Depressed Youth: A Randomised Trial of Adjunct Memory Specificity Training
Query!
Scientific title
Enhancing Treatment for Depression: A Randomised Trial of Adjunct Memory Specificity Training
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
297368
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
depression
311506
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
310139
310139
0
0
Query!
Depression
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This study will examine the effect of c-MeST in addition to usual care, and test whether it enhances treatment effects and reduces risk of depression at follow-up.
The computerised Memory Specificity Training program (c-MeST) comprises seven modules based on content from validated methods of improving autobiographical memory specificity and reducing depressive symptoms. The intervention is accessed online, is individually administered, and completely automated.
Initially, the aims, rationale, structure, and process of the intervention will be presented to participants. In each of the 7 modules (approximately taking 15-30 minutes) participants are provided with examples of specific autobiographical memories (AM). They are then provided with a series of cue words and sentences and asked to retrieve specific memories from their past relating to these cues. These include positive, neutral, and negatively-themed cue words (e.g., proud, sorrow, table), as well as prompt questions to elicit AM. Participants’ responses are fed into an algorithm which has been tuned to identify whether the participants response is a specific AM or not. Feedback is then given to help participants learn how to correctly retrieve specific AM. Participants can access the intervention for a period of 1 month, and complete modules at their own pace and convenience.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
313623
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Usual care will consist of care pathway provided by the organisation at which the young person has sought help. This will likely be psychological therapy and/or antidepressant medication.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
319036
0
Major Depressive Episode as assessed using the electronic Psychological Assessment System (e-PASS; Nguyen...Austin et al., 2015),a diagnostic system for DSM disorders.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319036
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319036
0
Baseline, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
319037
0
Depressive symptoms using the depression subscale of the 21-item version of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
319037
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
319037
0
Baseline, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
319038
0
Autobiographical memory specificity using the Autobiographical Memory Test (Williams & Broadbent, 1986)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
319038
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
319038
0
Baseline, 2 weeks later, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
366770
0
Suicidal ideation, using the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (Spijker et al., 2014)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
366770
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
366770
0
Baseline, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
366771
0
Rumination, using the Ruminative Response Scale (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
366771
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
366771
0
Baseline, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
366772
0
Cognitive avoidance, using the White Bear Suppression Inventory (Wagner et al., 1994)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
366772
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
366772
0
Baseline, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
366773
0
Verbal fluency using the COWAT (Lezak et al., 2004)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
366773
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
366773
0
Baseline, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
366774
0
Problem-solving ability, using the Means-End Problem-Solving Procedure (Platt & Spivak, 1972)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
366774
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
366774
0
Baseline, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
366775
0
General anxiety symptoms, using the Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale (Spitzer et al., 2006)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
366775
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
366775
0
Baseline, post-intervention (1 months), and follow-up at 3 and 6 months.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
(i) 15-65 years of age, (ii) residing in Australia, (iii) a current diagnosis of a Major Depressive Episode, and (iv) internet access in the home or phone.
Query!
Minimum age
15
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria will be: (i) non-fluency in English, (ii) psychotic, neurodevelopmental, and substance use disorders
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Permuted block randomisation
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Power calculation and analyses: A total sample of 128 participants will be needed. This will be sufficient to detect a moderate-sized, clinically-meaningful between-groups effect of d = .50, with .80 power and alpha level of 0.05 (two-tailed), while controlling for amount of usual care treatment (type and amount monitored at each time-point). 154 participants will be recruited at baseline to allow for 20% attrition. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, with supplementary per protocol analyses. Linear mixed models analysis will be used, with group, and interaction modelled as fixed effects, and participants, time-points, and practice location modelled as random effects.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
13/08/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/05/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/11/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
154
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
301936
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
301936
0
Australian Rotary Health
Query!
Address [1]
301936
0
2nd Floor, 43 Hunter Street,
Parramatta NSW 2150
Query!
Country [1]
301936
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Deakin University
Query!
Address
221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, 3125 VIC Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
301691
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
301691
0
Query!
Address [1]
301691
0
Query!
Country [1]
301691
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
302618
0
Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
302618
0
221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood VIC 3125
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
302618
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
302618
0
18/02/2019
Query!
Approval date [1]
302618
0
15/03/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
302618
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Current effects of treatment for depression in youth are modest. There is clear scope to enhance intervention in this critical period of early-onset depression. One way to do this is to target known cognitive vulnerabilities. This study will examine the effect of computerised memory specificity training (c-MeST) in addition to usual care, and test whether it enhances treatment effects and reduces risk of depression at follow-up. Youth aged 15-25 presenting to participating mental health service providers will be randomised to usual care + c-MeST or usual care. c-MeST involves completing a series of online modules providing personal memories with feedback to encourage more specific and detailed account of experiences. It is hypothesised that: • The c-MeST + usual care group will report significantly higher rates of remission of clinical and subclinical depression and lower severity of depressive symptoms at 1, 3, and 6 six-month follow-up, relative to a usual care group. • Improvements in memory specificity at 2 weeks will predict improvements in remission rates and severity of depressive symptoms at 1, 3 months and at 6 month follow-up. • The c-MeST + usual care group will report significant improvements on secondary outcomes of suicidal ideation, rumination, executive functioning, and problem-solving ability at 1, 3 months and six-month follow-up, relative to a usual care group.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
90838
0
Dr David John Hallford
Query!
Address
90838
0
School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood VIC 3125
Query!
Country
90838
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90838
0
+61 421 763 436
Query!
Fax
90838
0
Query!
Email
90838
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
90839
0
David John Hallford
Query!
Address
90839
0
School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood VIC 3125
Query!
Country
90839
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90839
0
+61 421 763 436
Query!
Fax
90839
0
Query!
Email
90839
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
90840
0
David John Hallford
Query!
Address
90840
0
School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood VIC 3125
Query!
Country
90840
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90840
0
+61 421 763 436
Query!
Fax
90840
0
Query!
Email
90840
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Participating organisations have requested that individual data not be shared.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
A study protocol for a randomised trial of adjunct computerised memory specificity training (c-MeST) for major depression in youth: Targeting cognitive mechanisms to enhance usual care outcomes in mental health settings.
2020
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4036-6
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF