Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000279123
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
14/02/2019
Date registered
25/02/2019
Date last updated
25/02/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
25/02/2019
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
THE KNEE STRESS TEST: a proposed test for assessing patient outcomes following knee replacement using a bicycle power meter
Query!
Scientific title
THE KNEE STRESS TEST: a proposed test for assessing patient outcomes in knee arthroplasty
using a bicycle power meter
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
297418
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Knee arthroplasty
311587
0
Query!
Knee osteoarthritis
311588
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
310217
310217
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
310218
310218
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Surgery
310292
310292
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Assess muscle function using a power meter attached to a stationary bicycle in participants undergoing total knee arthroplasty surgery. Muscle power will be assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months to determine the reliability and validity of the power meter testing protocol in this patient population.
At each assessment participants will undergo a routine physical examination by an Orthopaedic Surgeon or Physiotherapist to ensure they have adequate range of movement and physical ability to operate the bicycle. The participants will be asked to complete the OKS and KOOS questionnaires. The bicycle power assessment and the performance-based outcome measures (10MWT and 30sSTS) will then be completed with assistance from the physiotherapist. The participants will be asked whether they have pain when completing the 10MWT, 30sSTS and bicycle power assessment, and if applicable a score from 0 to 10 for their level of pain, with 0 being no pain. The bicycle power assessment will consist of a 1-minute warm-up, followed by three sprint phases of 10 seconds (maximal exertion) with 1-minute recovery phases in between.
Total duration of the assessments is approximately 30 minutes pre-operatively and 20 mins post-operatively at 3,6 and 12 months.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
313665
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
We will also assess muscle function in healthy participants on two occasions to determine the reliability of the power meter testing protocol. The testing occasions will be 1 week apart.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
319100
0
Maximum power output (watts) using the InfoCrank Power Meter (Verve Cycling, AUS). This information is read by a O_Synce Navi2coach bike computer (Verve Cycling, AUS). Data is then transferred to a cycling analysis software program, Golden Cheetah for Windows (GoldenCheetah v3.4).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319100
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319100
0
Pre-operatively, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op and 12 months post-op (primary endpoint)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
319101
0
Average power output (watts) using the InfoCrank Power Meter (Verve Cycling, AUS). This information is read by a O_Synce Navi2coach bike computer (Verve Cycling, AUS). Data is then transferred to a cycling analysis software program, Golden Cheetah for Windows (GoldenCheetah v3.4).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
319101
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
319101
0
Pre-operatively, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op and 12 months post-op (primary endpoint)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
366973
0
Self-reported knee function using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
366973
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
366973
0
Pre-operatively, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
366974
0
Self reported knee function using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
366974
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
366974
0
Pre-operatively, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
366975
0
Walking speed (m/sec) using the 10 meter walk test
Query!
Assessment method [3]
366975
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
366975
0
Pre-operatively, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op and 12 months post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
366976
0
Leg strength and endurance using the 30 second sit-to-stand test
Query!
Assessment method [4]
366976
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
366976
0
Pre-operatively, 3 months post-op, 6 months post-op and 12 months post-op
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Total Knee Arthroplasty Participants:
-Adult participants greater than 18 years of age
-Participants undergoing a unicompartmental or total knee replacement by a study investigor.
Control Participants:
-Adult participants greater than 18 years of age
-No current or previous episodes of knee pain
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Total Knee Arthroplasty Participants:
-Participants with poor English who are unable to complete the questionnaires and understand instructions
-Participants who are physically unable to mount bicycle (severe pain, non-ambulant)
-Participants with a <90 degree knee range of movement or significant stiffness as diagnosed by the Orthopaedic Surgeon or Physiotherapist
-Participants with an unstable cardiovascular or respiratory condition
-Participants with a height greater than or equal to 6’3” (190.5cm)
-Participants with a weight greater than or equal to 108.5kg
Control Participants:
-Previous lower limb surgery
-Participants with an unstable cardiovascular or respiratory condition
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
All participants eligible for inclusion in this study will be included in the data analysis. Descriptive statistics will be reported. Linear mixed model regression will be used to assess whether strength improves post TKA, including participant as a random factor to account for the correlation inherent in a repeated measures design. The association between objective power, subjective measures of knee function and performance-based testing will also be explored using regression analyses. All models will also include potential confounding factors as covariates (e.g. age, gender etc) when applicable. A significance level will be set at P<0.05. A total of 90 participants will be recruited as per our power calculation. Test-retest reliability will be assessed using the ICC from a 2 way mixed model with the absolute agreement definition. The variability in the measure will be further described using the standard error of measurement and minimum detectable difference. A total of 20 control participants will be recruited as per our power calculation.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
12/09/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
12/07/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
12/07/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
110
Query!
Accrual to date
57
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
301985
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
301985
0
St John of God Murdoch Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
301985
0
St John of God Murdoch Hospital
100 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch,
WA, 6150
Query!
Country [1]
301985
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
St John of God Murdoch Hospital
Query!
Address
St John of God Murdoch Hospital
100 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch,
WA, 6150
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
301767
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
301767
0
Mr Mark Hurworth
Query!
Address [1]
301767
0
Murdoch Orthopaedic Clinic
Suite 10
100 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch
WA 6150
Query!
Country [1]
301767
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
302664
0
St John of God Healthcare Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
302664
0
Suite 304, Level 3 St John of God Subiaco Clinic 25 McCourt St Subiaco, WA 6008
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
302664
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
302664
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
302664
0
14/07/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
302664
0
1196
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study will look at a new method for testing muscle function and outcome following knee surgery. The new method uses a bicycle power meter to test muscle power before and after surgery. Ninety patients who are having knee surgery will be tested before and after surgery to look for improvements in muscle power and whether this corresponds with self-reported function. We hypothesise that the bike power meter is a reliable and easy test to look at patient outcome following knee surgery. Results will help surgeons in identifying patients with poor recovery so that more rehabilitation can be provided to improve their surgery outcome.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
90986
0
Mr Mark Hurworth
Query!
Address
90986
0
Murdoch Orthopaedic Clinic
Suite 10/100 Murdoch Drive
Murdoch WA 6150
Query!
Country
90986
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90986
0
+61 863326332
Query!
Fax
90986
0
Query!
Email
90986
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
90987
0
Rebekah Gibbons
Query!
Address
90987
0
Murdoch Centre for Orthopaedic Research
Lower Ground Research Hub
St John of God Murdoch Hospital
100 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch
WA, 6150
Query!
Country
90987
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90987
0
+61 894389007
Query!
Fax
90987
0
Query!
Email
90987
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
90988
0
Rebekah Gibbons
Query!
Address
90988
0
Murdoch Centre for Orthopaedic Research
Lower Ground Research Hub
St John of God Murdoch Hospital
100 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch
WA, 6150
Query!
Country
90988
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90988
0
+61 894389007
Query!
Fax
90988
0
Query!
Email
90988
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF