Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000388112
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
5/03/2019
Date registered
12/03/2019
Date last updated
16/04/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
12/03/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Screening and Induction of Labour: OUTcomes for mothers and babies
Query!
Scientific title
Induction of Labour at 39 week's gestation for women at high risk of Caesarean Section for slow progress of labour - A pilot randomised controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
297508
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
SAIL-OUT
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Term Pregnancy
311701
0
Query!
Induction of Labour
311703
0
Query!
Caesarean Section
311829
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
310325
310325
0
0
Query!
Fetal medicine and complications of pregnancy
Query!
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
310488
310488
0
0
Query!
Childbirth and postnatal care
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Women eligible for randomisation who screen high risk of caesarean section for slow progress in labour will be offered randomisation for two arms: induction of labour at 39 week's vs continuation of normal pregnancy care.
The intervention is induction of labour in the 39th week of pregnancy. The consent for induction will be undertaken by the research team (doctor or midwife) and the induction process will be undertaken as per local health policy guidelines by clinical midwives or doctors with cervical ripening using Prostoglandin E2 and/or cook's balloon catheter (if Bishop score <7) with appropriate external fetal monitoring followed by artificial rupture of membranes and syntocinon with appropriate fetal monitoring (as needed).
There are one to two slots per week allocated for this pilot which are seperate to the normal induction bookings as not to interfere with normal induction booking process. The day of labour induction in the 39th week will be decided based on both participant preference as well as labour ward acuity (including other booked indicated induction, staffing allowances, preferred weekday slots and emergencies) to ensure that patient safety is not compromised.
Given this is a pilot study to assess feasibility, intervention fidelity (ie induction in the 39th week) will be assessed both qualitatively with a patient satisfaction questionnaire and quantitatively through audit of medical records.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
313806
0
Early detection / Screening
Query!
Intervention code [2]
313807
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Active Control: continuation of normal pregnancy care.
Normal pregnancy care encompasses routine ultrasound review and weekly review of patients. If complications of pregnancy develop, patients will undergo appropriate review, investigation and management by clinicians (midwives and doctors who are not nominated research staff). Review may lead to the possibility of medically indicated induction of labour or emergency caesarean section prior to onset of spontaneous labour. After delivery, medical records will be audited.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
319300
0
Proportion of women who are approached that participate
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319300
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319300
0
36+0/40-37+6/40 weeks gestation
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
319301
0
Proportion of women who are approached that are randomised
Query!
Assessment method [2]
319301
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
319301
0
36+0/40-37+6/40 weeks gestation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
367625
0
Caesarean section for slow progress in labour assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [1]
367625
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
367625
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
367626
0
Caesarean section rate (overall) assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [2]
367626
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
367626
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
367627
0
Instrumental birth rate assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [3]
367627
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
367627
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
367628
0
Obstetric anal sphincter injury assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [4]
367628
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
367628
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
367629
0
Post-partum haemorrhage assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [5]
367629
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
367629
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
367630
0
Length of labour assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [6]
367630
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
367630
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
367631
0
Analgesia in labour assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [7]
367631
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
367631
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
367632
0
Length of hospital stay assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [8]
367632
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
367632
0
6 weeks postpartum
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
367633
0
Breastfeeding on discharge assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [9]
367633
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
367633
0
6 weeks postpartum
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
367634
0
Gestational age at birth assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [10]
367634
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
367634
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
367635
0
Oxytocin use in labour assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [11]
367635
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
367635
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
367636
0
5 min APGAR score assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [12]
367636
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
367636
0
Delivery
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
367917
0
Admission to NICU assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [13]
367917
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
367917
0
Delivery to 6 weeks postpartum
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
367918
0
Abnormal umbilical arterial cord blood gases assessed via data-linkage to medical records
Query!
Assessment method [14]
367918
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
367918
0
Delivery
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Pregnant
- Female
- Greater than 18 years
- Planned vaginal birth
- Cephalic presentation
- Screening ultrasound at 36+0 to 37+6 weeks gestation for fetal biometry, amniotic fluid index and metal Doppler studies
- Positive screen risk for caesarean section for failure to progress in labour
- Potential participants with a risk of caesarean section for abnormal progress in labour of >= 28% will be eligible to participate
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
55
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Planned induction of labour before the estimated date of confinement
- Previous caesarean section or uterine incision
- Any indication for elective caesarean section
- Known major anatomic fetal abnormality
- Any contraindication for induction of labour
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation involves contacting the holder of the allocation schedule who is "off-site"
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation will be performed as block randomisation with a 1:1 allocation.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Analysis will be by intention to treat (according to treatment allocation), including withdrawals and losses to follow up.
The results will be reported according to CONSORT guidelines.
Demographics and other potential confounders will be compared by treatment allocation in a univariate analysis. Categorical outcome measures will be compared by proportions (chi-squared test), means for normally distributed data (t-test), or rank order for non-normally distributed data (Wilcoxon rank sum test).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
18/04/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/07/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
13306
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
25857
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
302067
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
302067
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Women and Babies
Query!
Address [1]
302067
0
50 Missenden Road
Camperdown
NSW 2050
Query!
Country [1]
302067
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Women and Babies
Query!
Address
50 Missenden Road
Camperdown
NSW 2050
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
301883
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
301883
0
Query!
Address [1]
301883
0
Query!
Country [1]
301883
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
302748
0
Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee - RPAH
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
302748
0
RPAH Medical Centre Suite 210A, Level 2 100 Carillon Avenue NEWTOWN NSW 2042
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
302748
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
302748
0
14/09/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
302748
0
01/11/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
302748
0
Protocol No X18-0343 & HREC/18/RPAH/482
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The caesarean section (CS) rate has risen to the point where a third of all mothers in Australia give birth by this method [1]. CS is a major contributing factor to maternal mortality and morbidity following childbirth in developed countries and reducing the overall CS rate is a major policy goal for NSW Health [2]. The highest risk of adverse outcomes associated with CS occurs when it is performed during labour which is 40% of all CSs[1, 3]. Most of these are due to failure to progress (FTP) which accounts for around 8% of all births[3]. Induction of labour (IOL) reduces the risk of CS, particularly when there is a low risk of fetal distress [4, 5], but it is not feasible to offer this intervention to all women because given time, most women will labour naturally. To date, there is no method of prospectively identifying women who are most likely to benefit from IOL. Predictive models could identify women who might benefit from preventative measures such as induction of labour. We have created a model which will be used to screen for women at high risk of caesarean section in labour. This model incorporates maternal age, body mass index (BMI), height, gestational diabetes, estimated fetal weight, amniotic fluid index, and parity. We will be investigating if induction of labour compared with routine antenatal care at 39 weeks of gestation in women with a cephalic presenting fetus reduces the risk of caesarean section for abnormal progress in labour. References: 1.Hilder, L., et al., Australia's mothers and babies 2012. Perinatal statistics series no. 30. Canberra: AIHW, in Australia's mothers and babies 2012. 2. Health, N., Maternity - Towards normal birth in NSW, N. Ministry of Health, Editor. 2010. 3. Zhang, J., et al., Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010. 203(4): p. 326 e1-326 e10. 4. Gülmezoglu, A.M., et al., Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(6). 5. Boers, K.E., et al., Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ, 2010. 341: p. c7087.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
91262
0
Dr Bradley De Vries
Query!
Address
91262
0
Women and Babies
RPAH
50 Missenden Road
Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
91262
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
91262
0
+61 02 9515 6111
Query!
Fax
91262
0
Query!
Email
91262
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
91263
0
Jessica Jellins
Query!
Address
91263
0
Fetal Medicine Unit
Women and Babies
RPAH
50 Missenden Road
Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
91263
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
91263
0
+61 02 9515 6111
Query!
Fax
91263
0
Query!
Email
91263
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
91264
0
Jessica Jellins
Query!
Address
91264
0
Fetal Medicine Unit
Women and Babies
RPAH
50 Missenden Road
Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
91264
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
91264
0
+61 02 9515 6111
Query!
Fax
91264
0
Query!
Email
91264
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
This is a pilot study
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF