Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000726156
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
29/03/2019
Date registered
14/05/2019
Date last updated
21/06/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
14/05/2019
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
An experimental study of the influence of choice (versus no choice) of placebo treatment on reported side effects (nocebo effects) in healthy participants
Query!
Scientific title
An experimental study of the influence of choice (versus no choice) of placebo treatment on reported side effects (nocebo effects) in healthy participants
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
297833
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anxiety
312203
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
310748
310748
0
0
Query!
Anxiety
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
There are 2 exposures in this study. First exposure to a placebo treatment described as a benzodiazepine (actually containing only lactose), compared to no exposure i.e. no treatment. Second, exposure to 1 of 3 treatment choice conditions (no choice of placebo treatments, choice of 2 placebo treatments, choice of 10 placebo treatments). Thus, participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions: 1) No treatment control, 2) No choice of placebo treatment, 3) Choice between two placebo treatments, 4) Choice between ten placebo treatments. All participants will be asked to complete an experimental anxiety induction (straw breathing task) in order to ostensibly assess the impact of the benzodiazepine (actually placebo) on anxiety. The intervention will be delivered by a university research student, in the research rooms of the UNSW Psychology Clinic.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
314070
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The comparator is a no treatment control group. This group will undergo all other study procedures (questionnaires, brief anxiety-induction task, blood pressure and heart rate measurement), but will not be given a placebo treatment to take.
In addition, in order to assess the effect of choice on the nocebo effect, the no choice of placebo treatment group will form a second comparator condition. These participants will be randomly assigned a placebo treatment to take, and will complete all study procedures.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
319596
0
Nocebo effect - assessed via self-reported physical symptoms using the Generic Assessment of Side Effects Scale (1). This scale was designed to assess general drug side effects in clinical trials.
1. Rief W, Barsky AJ, Glombiewski JA, Nestoriuc Y, Glaesmer H, Braehler E. Assessing general side effects in clinical trials: reference data from the general population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20:405–15.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319596
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319596
0
Primary time point: 30 minutes post-placebo administration (or equivalent time-point in the no treatment control condition)
Secondary time point: at 24-hour follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
368830
0
Placebo effect - assessed via self-reported anxiety using the state version of the Speilberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory, as well as a single-item measure developed for this study asking participants "How anxious are you feeling right now"? This item is rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 (not anxious at all) to 10 (extremely anxious)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
368830
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
368830
0
30 minutes post-placebo administration (or equivalent time-point in the no treatment control condition)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
370318
0
Heart rate measured using an Omron HEM-7130 Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Monitor
Query!
Assessment method [2]
370318
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
370318
0
30 minutes post-placebo administration (or equivalent time-point in the no treatment control condition)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
370319
0
Blood pressure measured using an Omron HEM-7130 Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Monitor
Query!
Assessment method [3]
370319
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
370319
0
30 minutes post-placebo administration (or equivalent time-point in the no treatment control condition)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Able to ingest ingredients of placebo capsules (lactose, gelatin). In line with cover story of a benzodiazepine treatment, participants must also not have any contraindications for benzodiazepine use or previous adverse reaction.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Unable to consume gelatine or lactose. Self-reported anxiety assessed as severe or extremely severe by DASS-21 anxiety subscale.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation concealment will be achieved using sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by the random number generator function in Microsoft Excel
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
In order to detect a medium-to-large effect size in the nocebo effect (f=.32; from Bartley et al., 2016), with an alpha level of 0.05 and power of 80%, an estimated 28 participants will be required per group, 112 participants in total.
Planned comparisons will be used to assess nocebo and placebo effect outcomes. To assess the overall presence of nocebo and placebo effects, the no treatment control condition will be compared to the placebo-treated groups. To assess the effect of choice, the no choice group will be compared to 1) the 2-choice group, and 2) the 10-choice group. To assess the effect of number of options, the 2-choice group will be compared to the 10-choice group.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
27/03/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
13/09/2019
Query!
Actual
13/08/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
15/09/2019
Query!
Actual
14/08/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
112
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
120
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
302355
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
302355
0
Australian Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
302355
0
Level 2 11 Lancaster Pl, Canberra Airport, Australian Capital Territory 2609
Query!
Country [1]
302355
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Kate Faasse
Query!
Address
School of Psychology
University of New South Wales
UNSW Sydney 2052
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
302251
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
302251
0
Query!
Address [1]
302251
0
Query!
Country [1]
302251
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
303029
0
The University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
303029
0
Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) The University of New South Wales UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2052
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
303029
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
303029
0
27/10/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
303029
0
22/11/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
303029
0
HC16864
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study will use sham placebo treatments, ostensibly a benzodiazepine medicines being tested to assess their effectiveness for experimentally-induced anxiety, to assess the influence of choice of treatment (no choice, choice of 2 treatments, choice of 10 treatments) on the nocebo effect (assessed via self-reported physical symptoms that are described as benzodiazepine side effects). To assess the development and magnitude of the nocebo effect, placebo-treated participants will be compared to a no treatment control condition. It is hypothesised that a nocebo effect will be seen across the three groups of placebo-treated participants. It is also hypothesised that, compared to the no choice group, the 2 choice group will report lower physical symptoms scores, and the 10 choice group will report higher or at least equivalent physical symptoms scores.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
92226
0
Dr Kate Faasse
Query!
Address
92226
0
School of Psychology
University of New South Wales
UNSW Sydney 2052
Query!
Country
92226
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92226
0
+61 293850364
Query!
Fax
92226
0
Query!
Email
92226
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
92227
0
Kate Faasse
Query!
Address
92227
0
School of Psychology
University of New South Wales
UNSW Sydney 2052
Query!
Country
92227
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92227
0
+61 293850364
Query!
Fax
92227
0
Query!
Email
92227
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
92228
0
Kate Faasse
Query!
Address
92228
0
School of Psychology
University of New South Wales
UNSW Sydney 2052
Query!
Country
92228
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92228
0
+61 293850364
Query!
Fax
92228
0
Query!
Email
92228
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Participant-level data will not be made publicly available for this experimental study.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF