Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12620000029998
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
24/08/2019
Date registered
20/01/2020
Date last updated
20/01/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
20/01/2020
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Open Observational Multicenter Study on Effectiveness of Robotic Exercise (End Effector Vs Exoscheleton) for Functional Recovery of Upper Limb in stroke outcomes (ROBOTAS)
Query!
Scientific title
Effectiveness of Robotic Exercise (End Effector Vs Exoscheleton) for Functional Recovery of Upper Limb in stroke outcomes: an Observational Multicenter Study (ROBOTAS)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
298078
0
n/a
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1232-4359
Query!
Trial acronym
ROBOTAS
Query!
Linked study record
n/a
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
stroke
312582
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Stroke
311094
311094
0
0
Query!
Ischaemic
Query!
Stroke
311095
311095
0
0
Query!
Haemorrhagic
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
True
Query!
Target follow-up duration
3
Query!
Target follow-up type
Months
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants would have received the intervention./comparator regardless of this studySubject enrolled will perform. Both group receive Robotic treatment for 20 session (3 or 5 time per week) as per clinical routine rehabilitation procedures.
The intervention includes 20 session of 40 minutes (including 10 minutes for set-up) of robotic exoskeleton arm rehabilitation (Armeo Power, Armeo Spring,T-WREX and Armin); 3 or 5 times per week in 6 weeks (according to current clinical practice), delivered in hospital and performed by trained physioterapist in 1:1 ratio with a patients.
The use of exoskeletons allow to provide functional movements assisted by robots at the shoulder, elbow and at the wrist with a videofeedback in an exergaming context.
Exercises regard shoulder, elbow and hand movement assted by roibot and with a videofeedback monitor. The assistence of the robot will be progressively reduced, according to subject improvement/capacity. (For both group and according to routine clinical indications).
The compartor include the same clinical routine practice with 6 weeks of robotic exercises for shoulder, elbow and hand movement assted by roibot and with a videofeedback monitor, but delivered with an end-effector device (Bimanutrack, Amadeo, MIT-MANUS InMotion 2, Nerebot).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
314309
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The comparator consists in
i) 20 session of 40 minutes (including 10 minutes for set-up) robotic end effector arm rehabilitation
ii) 3 or 5 times per week;
iii) delivered in hospital
iv) by trained physioterapist in 1:1 ratio with patients.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
319877
0
Fugl Meyer Assessment Scale (Fugl Meyer A 1975) - Upper limb (FMA) 0-66
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319877
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319877
0
baseline (T0)
weeks 4, (T1)
weeks 8 (T2)
3 months after the end of the treatment (T3)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
369759
0
Motricity Index for Upper Limb (Demeurisse G, 1980) ;
Query!
Assessment method [1]
369759
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
369759
0
baseline (T0)
weeks 4, (T1)
weeks 8 (T2)
3 months after the end of the treatment (T3)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
375938
0
Modified Ashworth Scale (for the spasticity)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
375938
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
375938
0
baseline (T0)
weeks 4, (T1)
weeks 8 (T2)
3 months after the end of the treatment (T3)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
375939
0
Numerical Rating Scale for Pain
Query!
Assessment method [3]
375939
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
375939
0
baseline (T0)
weeks 4, (T1)
weeks 8 (T2)
3 months after the end of the treatment (T3)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
375940
0
Box & Block Test (to assess gross manual dexterity)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
375940
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
375940
0
baseline (T0)
weeks 4, (T1)
weeks 8 (T2)
3 months after the end of the treatment (T3)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
375941
0
Frenchay Activity Index ( to assess instrumental activities of daily living)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
375941
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
375941
0
baseline (T0)
weeks 4, (T1)
weeks 8 (T2)
3 months after the end of the treatment (T3)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
375942
0
Barthel Index (to assess global ability)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
375942
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
375942
0
baseline (T0)
weeks 4, (T1)
weeks 8 (T2)
3 months after the end of the treatment (T3)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
a) previous documented ischemic / haemorrhagic cerebrovascular event with neuroradiological examinations (CT, MRI) with functional upper limb deficiency, with sensorimotor and monoparesis / hemiparesis deficits;
b) age> 18 years;
c) ability to maintain the sitting position.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
a) bilateral impairment;
b) neglect, according to clinical judgment;
c) cognitive or behavioral impairment that affects the understanding or execution of robotic training;
d) impossibility or unavailability to provide informed consent;
e) treatment with botulinum toxin in the previous 3 months and throughout the study (including follow-up)
f) other serious medical problems.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Both
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Data analysis will be conducted by prof. Stefano Mazzoleni, from the Institute of Biorobotics, Scuola Superiore S.Anna Pisa.
The enrolled patients will be stratified in two groups: patients in the subacute phase (within three months of the stroke) and in the chronic phase (after three months from the stroke).
The results of the treatments will be analyzed based on the type of robot used: end effector and exoskeleton (treatment 2).
The values of all clinical outcome measures recorded between T0 and T2 (pre and post treatment, respectively), T0 and T1, T1 and T2, T0 and T3, T2 and T3 will be analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank test in the SigmaStat environment in the case of measurements deriving from ordinal scales and with t-tests for continuous numerical data. The statistical significance will be set at p <0.05.
The sample size, in relation to the clinically significant changes in the primary outcome, was calculated for 58 patients treated with an exoskeletal robot and 58 patients treated with end-effector in the subacute group, 83 patients treated with an exoskeletal robot and 83 for patients treated with end-effector in the group of chronic patients. More specifically, knowing the distribution of the devices in the 18 Centers that have already joined the study (9 with exoskeletal devices and 9 with robot end effector) it is believed to enroll at least 7 cases of subacute patients and 10 cases of chronic patients for Center.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
15/06/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/06/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/10/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
141
Query!
Accrual to date
120
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
21439
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [1]
21439
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
302608
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
302608
0
ASST monza - Ospedale San Gerardo
Query!
Address [1]
302608
0
Via G. B. Pergolesi, 33, 20900 Monza MB
Query!
Country [1]
302608
0
Italy
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
ASST monza - Ospedale San Gerardo
Query!
Address
Via G. B. Pergolesi, 33, 20900 Monza MB
Query!
Country
Italy
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
302521
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
302521
0
Polo Sant' Anna Valdera, University "Scuola Superiore Sant' Anna"
Query!
Address [1]
302521
0
Polo Sant' Anna Valdera, Scuola Superiore Sant' Anna, The BioRobotics Institute, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio, 34, 56025 Pontedera (PI). Italy
Query!
Country [1]
302521
0
Italy
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [2]
302543
0
University
Query!
Name [2]
302543
0
San Raffaele University,
Query!
Address [2]
302543
0
Via di Val Cannuta, 247, 00166 Roma. Italy.
Query!
Country [2]
302543
0
Italy
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
303243
0
COMITATO ETICO BRIANZA
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
303243
0
Via Pergolesi, 3 - 20090 Monza (MB)
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
303243
0
Italy
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
303243
0
27/11/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
303243
0
19/12/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
303243
0
n/a
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Currently, various robotic systems have been implemented for the rehabilitation of the upper limb in stroke outcomes. However, the characterization of the type of patient best suited to receive treatment with different robotic systems, in terms of neurological severity, type of cerebral stroke (and site of injury), distance from stroke and type of deficit (ie sensitives, sensors-motors , cognitive) remains an aspect of extreme clinical relevance but unexplored today. Moreover, the specific type of robot technology used is also not yet sufficiently investigated for its activity in the various phases of motor recovery. Understanding these aspects could on the one hand have positive repercussions on clinical practice by proposing highly customized pathways in order to promote the maximum recovery possible, on the other it could improve the scientific research sector allowing to study the recovery mechanisms promoted by specific technological devices . The objectives of the study is to evaluate the different action on upper limb recovery in stroke outcomes of robotic devices currently in use (end effector and exoskeletons). The study is conceived as a prospective multicenter observational cohort study comparing robotic devices in rehabilitation.
Query!
Trial website
n/a
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
n/a
Query!
Public notes
All centers involved with related contact person: Aprile Irene, Chiara Iacovelli, Fondazione don Carlo Gnocchi, Centro SM della Provvidenza, Roma iaprile@dongnocchi.it Bartolo Michelangelo, Unità di Neuroriabilitazione, HABILITA Zingonia (BG) michelangelobartolo@habilita.it Bonaiuti Donatella, U.O. Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione, osp.S.Gerardo, Monza Dbonaiuti2@yahoo.it Calabro’Salvatore, IRCCS Messina Roccos.calabro@irsscme.it Longhi Maria, Unità Operativa Medicina Riabilitativa Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Modena m.longhi@ausl.mo.it Chisari Carmelo, Stefania Dalise, U.O. Neuroriabilitazione - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana. c.chisari@ao-pisa.toscana.it Del Felice Alessandra, Michele Tonellato Riabilitazione, Azienda Universitario Ospedaliera, Padova Alessandra.delfelice@unipd.it Filoni Serena "Gli Angeli di Padre Pio" - Fondazione Centri di Riabilitazione Padre Pio Onlus. Viale Padre Pio n°24, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG) Serena.diba@gmail.com Focacci Antonella, Elisabetta Traverso ASL4Chiavarese traversoelisabetta@gmail.com Franceschini Marco, S.Raffaele Pisana, Roma, marco.franceschini@sanraffaele.it Gandolfi Marialuisa UOC Neuroriabilitazione, AOUI Verona, marialuisa,gandolfi@univr.it Liotti Vitalma, UOC Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa PO di Popoli, ASL di Pescara vItalma.liotti@ausl.pe.it Morone Giovanni, Neurorehabilitation IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Roma. g.morone@hsantalucia.it Pignolo Loris, Istituto S.Anna Crotone l.pignolo@istitutosantanna.it Posteraro Federico, AUSL Toscana Nord Ovest; federico.posteraro@auslnordovest.toscana.it Straudi Sofia, AOU Ferrara Sofia.straudi@gmail.com Taveggia Giovanni, Habilita Istituto Clinico, Care & Research Rehabilitation Hospitals Via P.A. Faccanoni 6 24067 Sarnico (BG), giovannitaveggia@habilitasarnico.it Tulli Daniela, Santo Stefano Riabilitazione (MC) Daniela.tulli@sstefano.it Waldner Andreas; CdC Priv. Villa Melitta, Bolzano, Andreas.waldner@villamelitta.it Altini Samantha; centro O.S.M.A.I.R.M Centro di Riabilitazione Laterza, s.altini@osmairm.it Leo M.Rosaria, villa Bellombra, Bologna mrosaria.leo@villabellombra.it Milia Paolo, Ist.Prosperius Tiberino, Umbertide paolo.milia@prosperiustiberino.it
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
92982
0
Dr Donatella Bonaiuti
Query!
Address
92982
0
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, S. Gerardo Hospital, Via G. B. Pergolesi, 33, 20900 Monza (MB), Italy
Query!
Country
92982
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
92982
0
+39 039 2339531
Query!
Fax
92982
0
Query!
Email
92982
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
92983
0
Giovanni Morone
Query!
Address
92983
0
IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina, 306 00179. Rome
Query!
Country
92983
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
92983
0
+39 06 51501005
Query!
Fax
92983
0
Query!
Email
92983
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
92984
0
Giovanni Morone
Query!
Address
92984
0
IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina, 306 00179. Rome
Query!
Country
92984
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
92984
0
+39 06 51501005
Query!
Fax
92984
0
Query!
Email
92984
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
No patient permission to share data outside this study.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Robot-assisted training for upper limb in stroke (ROBOTAS): An observational, multicenter study to identify determinants of efficacy.
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225245
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF