Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12620000994987
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/08/2020
Date registered
6/10/2020
Date last updated
6/10/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
6/10/2020
Date results provided
6/10/2020
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Effect of gait training on walking stability in people with Parkinson's disease
Query!
Scientific title
Effect of real-time feedback on walking stability in people with Parkinson's disease
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
301958
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
None
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Parkinson’s disease
318535
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
316541
316541
0
0
Query!
Parkinson's disease
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
316940
316940
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Gait retraining.
The participant will receive real-time visual biofeedback regarding the frontal plane lean of their trunk as they walk along a level indoor walkway wearing their own closed-in footwear. The feedback will be projected onto a screen at the end of the walkway in the form of a moving line representing the magnitude of their trunk lean in real-time along with a shaded zone representing a target magnitude of lean they should try to avoid. Their baseline trunk lean will be calculated using marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis during normal walking. They will then be instructed to use this feedback to modify their movement patterns to reduce the magnitude of trunk lean as they walk by 30% from their average baseline mediolateral excursion (as represented by the shaded zone). This intervention will be facilitated by an Exercise Scientist/Biomechanist and delivered in a single session at the Biomechanics laboratory, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, will last 10-20 minutes and will be completed at a self-selected walking pace. Outcome data will be collected across two sessions, with Session 1 consisting of: (i) Baseline walking trials (at least 5 trials), (ii) walking trials during the delivery of the intervention (at least the last 5 trials of the intervention), (iii) 5 minutes post intervention (at least 5 trials), and Session 2 consisting of (iv) follow-up walking trials (at least 5 trials). The exact number of trials under each condition will be recorded manually by the session facilitator.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
318263
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
324668
0
Mediolateral trunk lean (deg) [Change from baseline] calculated using marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis during walking.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
324668
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
324668
0
Baseline; During intervention; 5 minutes post intervention; 1-week post-intervention. Primary timepoint comparison: Baseline versus 5 minutes post intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
385369
0
Gait velocity (m/s) [Change from baseline] calculated using marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis during walking.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
385369
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
385369
0
Baseline; During intervention; 5 minutes post intervention; 1-week post-intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
385370
0
Stride length (m) [Change from baseline] calculated using marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis during walking.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
385370
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
385370
0
Baseline; During intervention; 5 minutes post intervention; 1-week post-intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
385371
0
Mediolateral head motion (cm and cm/m·s-1) [Change from baseline] calculated using marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis during walking.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
385371
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
385371
0
Baseline; During intervention; 5 minutes post intervention; 1-week post-intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
385372
0
Mediolateral trunk motion (cm and cm/m·s-1) [Change from baseline] calculated using marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis during walking.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
385372
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
385372
0
Baseline; During intervention; 5 minutes post intervention; 1-week post-intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
385373
0
Mediolateral pelvis motion (cm and cm/m·s-1) [Change from baseline] calculated using marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis during walking.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
385373
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
385373
0
Baseline; During intervention; 5 minutes post intervention; 1-week post-intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
385374
0
Centre of mass to base of support distance (cm) [Change from baseline] calculated using marker-based three-dimensional motion analysis during walking.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
385374
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
385374
0
Baseline; During intervention; 5 minutes post intervention; 1-week post-intervention.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
(a) diagnosis of PD by a neurologist according to the United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank Clinical Diagnostic Criteria (Hughes, Daniel, Kilford & Lees, 1992);
(b) presenting with PD-related symptoms ranging from stages 1-3 on the H&Y scale (Goetz et al, 2004).
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
(a) significant surgery within the last three months that may influence walking;
(b) recurrent pain or injury affecting walking;
(c) an inability to walk without assistance (e.g. the use of handrails or a carer);
(d) significant visual (Bailey-Lovie high contrast visual acuity >0.30 logMAR)(Brown & Lovie-Kitchin, 1989) or cognitive impairment (Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination score of < 82 out of 100) (Mioshi, Dawson, Mitchell, Arnold & Hodges, 2006);
(e) has received deep brain stimulation;
(f) is greater than 80 years of age.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The primary research question seeks to determine differences in the average mediolateral trunk lean between the 4-time points (i: Baseline walking; ii: Intervention; iii: Post-intervention; iv: 1-week follow up), using a Repeated Measures ANOVA.
Sample size was estimated using G-Power (Version 3.1.9.2) based on a Repeated Measures ANOVA study design. As no previous data was available regarding changes in mediolateral trunk lean, the default medium effect size was selected (ES = 0.25). For a significance level of 0.05 and power of 80% the estimated sample size is n=24. To account for participant drop out between sessions we will aim to recruit 30 participants.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/11/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/09/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
3/10/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
25
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
306382
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
306382
0
Australian Catholic University
Query!
Address [1]
306382
0
40 Edward Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
Query!
Country [1]
306382
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Australian Catholic University
Query!
Address
40 Edward Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
306904
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
306904
0
Query!
Address [1]
306904
0
Query!
Country [1]
306904
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
306579
0
Australian Catholic University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
306579
0
40 Edward Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
306579
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
306579
0
17/08/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
306579
0
24/09/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
306579
0
2018-196H
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The aim of this program is to reduce the risk of falls in people with Parkinson's disease using non-invasive technology to monitor and improve their walking balance. Falls are a major cause of hospitalisation in people with PD, with 60% of all sufferers experiencing a fall each year. There is strong evidence that fallers walk with greater side to side head movement along with shorter step length and a slower cadence than non-fallers. Improving gait stability by retraining the way these individuals walk may thus have great potential to reduce the risk of falls and consequently reduce fall-related hospitalisations. A cross sectional study involving approximately 30 people with PD with mild to severe disease severity will be conducted. The effect of real-time feedback on walking mechanics will be investigated. Participation in this research will require individuals to visit the school of Exercise Science's Biomechanics Laboratory at the Brisbane campus of the Australian Catholic University on two separate occasions separated by approximately 1 week to complete a series of walking assessments. During these assessments, walking mechanics will be evaluated using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. The protocol will involve each participant receiving real-time biofeedback.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
104354
0
Dr Mark W. Creaby
Query!
Address
104354
0
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Road, Banyo, Queensland, 4014.
Query!
Country
104354
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
104354
0
+61 7 36237587
Query!
Fax
104354
0
Query!
Email
104354
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
104355
0
Mark Creaby
Query!
Address
104355
0
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Road, Banyo, Queensland, 4014.
Query!
Country
104355
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
104355
0
+61 7 36237587
Query!
Fax
104355
0
Query!
Email
104355
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
104356
0
Mark Creaby
Query!
Address
104356
0
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Road, Banyo, Queensland, 4014.
Query!
Country
104356
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
104356
0
+61 7 36237587
Query!
Fax
104356
0
Query!
Email
104356
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
This is a retrospective registration and IPD sharing was not covered as part of the ethics approval.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
Type
Is Peer Reviewed?
DOI
Citations or Other Details
Attachment
Study results article
Yes
2. McMaster, K., Cole, M. H., Chalkley, D., & Crea...
[
More Details
]
380324-(Uploaded-06-10-2023-12-29-38)-Journal results publication.pdf
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Gait biofeedback training in people with Parkinson's disease: a pilot study.
2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01051-1
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF