Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12622001557729
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/10/2022
Date registered
16/12/2022
Date last updated
16/12/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
16/12/2022
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Enhancing Guidewire Efficacy for transradial access: The EAGER Randomised Controlled Trial
Query!
Scientific title
Enhancing guidewire efficacy for adults undergoing transradial coronary angiography: The EAGER Randomised Controlled Trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
308083
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
EAGER
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Transradial Coronary Angiography
327773
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
324843
324843
0
0
Query!
Other cardiovascular diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Transradial coronary angiogram involves passing a catheter and guidewire through an initially inserted radial artery sheath to traverse up arterial system eventually into the aortic root. The guidewire is passed first being less traumatic than a catheter as to not cause vessel damage, then a catheter is railroaded over the guidewire to gain entry to the aorta. Completion of the angiogram involves mobilising the catheters into coronary arteries and injecting contrast which can be captured under fluoroscopic imaging. If results determine percutaneous intervention (stenting) needs to occur, catheters can be exchanged at this time and the procedure can take place. Coronary angiograms can take anywhere from 15 minutes to a few hours depending on what intervention needs to take place.
Once the radial sheath is inserted, traversing a guidewire and catheter to the aortic root can take as little as 10 to 20 seconds if a patient has favourable anatomy by the performing Cardiology Advanced Trainee or Cardiologist. If arterial tortuosity, stenosis or significant spasm are present, this can lead to difficulty or even inability to pass wires and catheters to the aorta. This can increase the duration of the procedure, predispose to arterial trauma, increase the amount of contrast needed or result in the need for alternate arterial access increasing risk of procedural complications.
Multiple guidewires exist which aid in the initial mobilisation of the angiogram catheter to the aorta. The traditionally wire was initially designed for femoral angiograms using larger arteries. Now that transradial is best practice method for coronary angiograms, alternate smaller and hydrophilic wires have been designed with suggestion they may help traverse the transradial arterial anatomy. We seek to determine if a hydrophilic J tipped 1.5mm 0.035” peripheral access wire (‘Baby J’ Glidewire, Terumo systems, Japan) is more successful that the larger traditionally used standard 3mm J tipped 0.035 guidewire in gaining access to the aorta to enable successful coronary angiogram. The procedure is observed by the radiographer do document procedure success and is verbally confirmed between the radiographer and Interventionalist at the completion of the procedure.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
324532
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The comparator group included those undergoing transradial coronary angiography using a peripheral 0.035” fixed core PTFE J-tipped guidewire upfront. This wire has been used for many years as it was initially designed to be used for femoral coronary angiography which passes through a larger arterial system than transradial, but continues in use today for radial procedures.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
332655
0
The primary endpoint is technical success - we define this as successful wire passage into aortic root without crossover to alternate guidewire or access site. This will be recorded by the Cath lab radiographer or angiogram procedurals on a data entry sheet who will be trained in study protocol.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
332655
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
332655
0
At completion of the coronary angiogram.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
414264
0
Procedure time. Collected by Cath lab radiographer who is educated on the study protocol
Query!
Assessment method [1]
414264
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
414264
0
By completion of coronary angiogram
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
414265
0
Time to selective coronary intubation
Collected by Cath lab radiographer who is educated on the study protocol
Query!
Assessment method [2]
414265
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
414265
0
By completion of coronary angiogram
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
414266
0
Crossover to alternative peripheral wire
Collected by Cath lab radiographer who is educated on the study protocol
Query!
Assessment method [3]
414266
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
414266
0
By completion of coronary angiogram
Collected by Cath lab radiographer who is educated on the study protocol
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
414268
0
Overall Bleeding complications – Bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) criteria
Recorded by Cath lab nursing staff who are educated in study protocol
Query!
Assessment method [4]
414268
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
414268
0
Assessed for up to 1 month post procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
414269
0
Vascular complications – Valve academic research consortium - 2 (VARC 2) criteria
Query!
Assessment method [5]
414269
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
414269
0
Assessed for up to 1 month post procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
414271
0
Radial spasm - Recorded by radiographer on data collection sheet as directed by technician who will make decision of spasm encountered
Query!
Assessment method [6]
414271
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
414271
0
Assessed continuously throughout the coronary angiogram procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
414272
0
Puncture Site bleeding complications (haematoma) formation - Collected in data entry sheet by Cath lab nursing staff on the day of angiography, or noted in the 4 week electronic medical record review by the study doctor.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
414272
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
414272
0
Assessed for up to 1 month post procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
416672
0
Time to access aorta - Recorded by radiographer in data entry form.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
416672
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
416672
0
By completion of coronary angiogram
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1) Age greater than or equal to 18 years old
2) Undergoing planned best practice transradial coronary angiography at Gosford District Hospital
3) Expected to have transradial access to coronary angiography prior to the procedure
4) Radial sheath able to be inserted for transradial access
5) Provide written informed consent before study participation.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1) Obligatory femoral access
2) Previous ipsilateral forearm radial artery occlusion.
3) Emergency/salvage coronary angiography where consent cannot be obtained.
4) Enrolment in an alternate study that competes or interferes with this study.
5) Any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator or operator, may pose a significant hazard to the subject if he or she is enrolled in the study.
6) Inability to provide informed consent for themselves.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software (i.e. computerised sequence generation).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Comparison of percentage of technical success between the groups with two-tailed pearson chi square for the primary outcome. We will also calculate odds ratio and 95%CI.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
10/10/2022
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
10/10/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
10/11/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
310
Query!
Accrual to date
100
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
23273
0
Gosford Hospital - Gosford
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
23699
0
John Hunter Hospital - New Lambton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
38642
0
2250 - Gosford
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
39134
0
2305 - New Lambton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
312336
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
312336
0
Gosford Hospital & Central Coast Local Health District
Query!
Address [1]
312336
0
Gosford Hospital. 75 Holden St, Gosford, NSW, 2250
Query!
Country [1]
312336
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Gosford Hospital CCLHD
Query!
Address
Gosford Hospital. 75 Holden St, Gosford, NSW, 2250
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
313900
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
313900
0
Nil
Query!
Address [1]
313900
0
Nil
Query!
Country [1]
313900
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311704
0
Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311704
0
Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee, Lookout Road, New Lambton NSW 2305
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311704
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311704
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
311704
0
27/07/2022
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311704
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Rationale: Transradial access for coronary angiogram is now standard for coronary angiography. It requires a guidewire to be directed up the radial artery to the aortic root to allow safe mobilization of catheters over it into the aorta to complete the procedure. The traditional guidewire made for femoral angiograms and predating transradial angiography is the peripheral 0.035” fixed core PTFE J-tipped wire (FC0.035) with a 3mm J tip curve radius. Radial arteries are smaller than femoral arteries and typically range from 2.2mm in diameter in women, to 2.7mm in men, both smaller than the J tip curve radius of 3mm in the FC0.035 wire which may predispose to radial spasm or vessel trauma. The hydrophilic J tip ‘baby J’ guidewire with a 1.5mm J tip radius has been designed to traverse areas of radial tortuosity and stenosis easier aiming for less spasm to improve success of passing catheters to the aortic root and is commonly used in coronary angiographic suites second line. However, the FC0.035 wire is still the traditional wire used in transradial coronary angiography, and direct comparison of their procedural success has not been studies to date. If indeed the baby J wire was demonstrated to have a higher success rate in gaining access to the aortic root compared to the FC0.035 wire, it would lead to less wire changes, and less need for alternate arterial punctures and subsequent predisposition to further vascular complications. If this were the case it would suggest it the baby J wire should be considered for use first line in transradial coronary angiography. The objective of this study is to determine if use of the baby J guidewire in transradial coronary angiogram has any difference in technical success compared to the traditionally used FC0.035” wire. The study design is a prospective randomised controlled trial with intention to treat analysis. The study population consists of Participants undergoing best practice coronary angiography or percutaneous intervention at Gosford District Hospital who consent to become enrolled in the trial. At least three hundred and ten Participants are aimed to be enrolled over 12 months. The main study endpoints include the primary outcome of technical success rates between guidewires. Secondary outcomes include crossover to alternative peripheral wire, crossover to alternative access site, bleeding rates (BARC criteria), vascular complications (VARC 2 criteria), radial spasm, haematoma formation (EASY criteria) time to wire entry of subclavian, aorta, and selective coronary intubation.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
122062
0
Dr Tom Ford
Query!
Address
122062
0
Cardiology Department, Gosford Hospital, 75 Holden St, Gosford,, NSW, 2250
Query!
Country
122062
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
122062
0
+614 26 267 347
Query!
Fax
122062
0
Query!
Email
122062
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
122063
0
Tom Ford
Query!
Address
122063
0
Cardiology Department, Gosford Hospital, 75 Holden St, Gosford,, NSW, 2250
Query!
Country
122063
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
122063
0
+61 02 4320 2111
Query!
Fax
122063
0
Query!
Email
122063
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
122064
0
Tom Ford
Query!
Address
122064
0
Cardiology Department, Gosford Hospital, 75 Holden St, Gosford,, NSW, 2250
Query!
Country
122064
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
122064
0
+61 02 4320 2111
Query!
Fax
122064
0
Query!
Email
122064
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
17223
Study protocol
384751-(Uploaded-05-10-2022-11-04-51)-Study-related document.docx
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF