Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000173695
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/02/2023
Date registered
21/02/2023
Date last updated
28/07/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
21/02/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Modification of Brain Rhythms on Intensity of Chronic Eye Pain
Query!
Scientific title
Efficacy of electroencephalography neurofeedback for neuropathic eye pain using a single case experimental design study with multiple baselines on four participants
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
308931
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Neuropathic Eye Pain
328937
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Eye
325923
325923
0
0
Query!
Diseases / disorders of the eye
Query!
Neurological
325924
325924
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This study will be conducted using a single-case experimental design (SCED) with multiple baselines across participants. The SCED method involves repeatedly assessing the dependent variables (i.e., pain intensity, pain interference) for each of the participants for the duration of the trial, across all phases. This study will use a design of AB + follow-ups, where 'A' refers to the baseline phase, 'B' is the intervention phase, and there will be two follow-up phases that follow. Four participants will be randomly assigned to different baseline durations of the SCED. In this study, one week (i.e., 7 days of observation) will be considered as a stable baseline. Each baseline phase will be followed by the intervention phase, where participants will complete twenty days of 30-minute EEG neurofeedback sessions over a 4-week period. There will be a 1-week follow-up for each participant immediately after completion of the intervention. Staggered baseline phases will be used under the SCED to ensure that stability is achieved. This will mean that all participants will start their baseline phase on the same day, but the baseline for the first participant will be 7 days, the second participant will have a baseline of 10 days, the third participant will have a baseline of 13 days and the fourth participant will have a baseline of 16 days. Each baseline phase will be followed by the intervention phase, where participants will each complete twenty days of 30-minute EEG neurofeedback sessions over a 4-week period. Following the intervention phase, there will be a 1-week follow up for each participant immediately after completion of the intervention. In addition, a further 1-week follow-up will take place five weeks after completion of the intervention. At the beginning of the baseline phase, each participant will complete self-report questionnaires for the primary and secondary outcomes in the form of a pain journal. Participants will continue to complete this pain journal during the intervention and follow-up phases, in order to monitor for changes in pain intensity and pain interference. Participants will be contacted every day to ensure that they're completing their pain journals at the appropriate times.
Each EEG neurofeedback session will be self-administered by participants in their homes. Each participant will complete twenty days of 30-minute EEG neurofeedback sessions over a 4-week period. Each session is comprised of three 5-minute intervals of EEG neurofeedback, with 3-minute breaks in between. Before starting each EEG neurofeedback session, participants will run an impedance check, to ensure the EEG device is positioned correctly and is accurately recording brain activity. The EEG neurofeedback treatment incorporates an EEG headset used to record and capture brain activity to be developed in-house and the interactive gaming interface that has been developed using the Unity3D game engine (Unity Technologies, USA). The neuromodulation treatment protocol targets and suppresses theta and low alpha (4-8 Hz) and high beta (20-30 Hz) frequency band powers and enhances high alpha (9-12 Hz) frequency band powers, which teaches participants to enter a mindful state, dampening pain signalling. During each EEG neurofeedback session, neurofeedback will be performed by recording and capturing the frequency bands of interest (i.e., 4-8 Hz, 9-12 Hz and 20-30 Hz) and relaying the information to the interactive gaming interface, which then provides visual feedback based on the activity recorded: when only one EEG frequency band power is suppressed or reinforced as desired, the game avatar will change colour; when two frequency band powers are activated correctly, the game avatar starts to move forward; and when all three frequency band powers are activated, the gaming background changes colour which indicates that participants have entered a mindful state. Participants will accumulate points for the amount of time they spend in this mindful state (i.e., number of seconds that a participant keeps all three frequency power bands activated). Hence, the aim of the game is to accumulate as many points as possible.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
325381
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group, as the EEG neurofeedback intervention will be compared to a no treatment baseline.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
333779
0
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will serve as the primary outcome measure of neuropathic eye pain. The NRS assesses pain intensity on a 0-10 scale (0 = "no pain" and 10 = "maximum pain imaginable").
Query!
Assessment method [1]
333779
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
333779
0
Participants in this study will be asked to rate the average intensity of their pain at the same time on one occasion each and every day, for the duration of the trial. If by the end of the trial any ratings are missing, the score will be averaged using the ratings obtained. Pain intensity will be recorded by participants in their pain journals, using paper-and-pencil. They will record pain intensity every day during all phases: baseline (7, 10, 13 or 16 days), intervention (28 days), and two follow-up (7 days) phases.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
418274
0
The degree of pain interference experienced by each participant will be assessed using 6 items from the Brief Pain Inventory. These items assess how each participant's eye pain interferes with aspects of daily life: general activity, normal work, relations with other people, enjoyment of life, mood and sleep. For each of these six aspects, pain interference will be graded on a 0-10 scale ("0" = "does not interfere" and 10 = "completely interferes").
Query!
Assessment method [1]
418274
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
418274
0
Like pain intensity, degree of pain interference will be measured on one occasion, every day during all phases of the trial: baseline, intervention and both follow-up phases.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Four individuals with neuropathic eye pain will be recruited for this study. Participants need to meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) a diagnosis of neuropathic eye pain based on clinical history, ocular and non-ocular pain symptoms, and structure and function of the corneal nerves, (2) neuropathic eye pain persisting for longer than 6 months, (3) average pain rating = or more than 3 over the last seven days (out of 10) on the Numerical Rating Scale (0 reflecting no pain and 10 reflecting maximum pain), (4) fluent in speaking and reading English, (5) not currently undergoing any changes to current eye pain treatment or eye procedures and (6) able to fully participate in the EEG neurofeedback intervention and is willing to complete all 20 sessions over the four-week intervention period.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
The key exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) diagnosis of a severe neurodegenerative and/or psychiatric disorder, (2) average pain rating < 3 over the last seven days (out of 10) on the Numerical Rating Scale (0 reflecting no pain and 10 reflecting maximum pain), (3) eye pain limiting prolonged exposure to digital screens for 20 minutes (comprises approximately one session of EEG neurofeedback), (4) individuals unable to complete twenty consecutive days of EEG neurofeedback treatment and (5) individuals located outside of Australia.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Both the primary and secondary outcome measures will be analysed separately, based on SCED analysis. Although SCED analysis primarily relies on visual inspection, both visual analysis and supplementary statistical analysis will be used to analyse the data from this trial. When visually analysis SCED data, a benchmark is established at baseline, which is used to compare against the data collected at intervention and during both follow-up phases, to identify any changes in the either outcome. A structured analysis will be used to investigate whether any changes to pain intensity and pain interference that were induced by the EEG are reliable and consistent across participants.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
3/10/2023
Query!
Actual
12/09/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/10/2023
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/01/2024
Query!
Sample size
Target
4
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
4
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
313141
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
313141
0
Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
313141
0
26/100 New South Head Rd, Sydney NSW 2027
Query!
Country [1]
313141
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
313149
0
University
Query!
Name [2]
313149
0
University of New South Wales
Query!
Address [2]
313149
0
University of New South Wales Sydney, High Street, Kensington, NSW 2052
Query!
Country [2]
313149
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [3]
313182
0
Government body
Query!
Name [3]
313182
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
Query!
Address [3]
313182
0
16 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra
Australian Capital Territory 2601
Query!
Country [3]
313182
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of New South Wales Sydney
Query!
Address
University of New South Wales Sydney, High Street, Kensington, NSW 2052
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
314843
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
314843
0
None
Query!
Address [1]
314843
0
None
Query!
Country [1]
314843
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
312384
0
UNSW Human Research Ethics Committee C
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
312384
0
UNSW Research Ethics & Compliance Support The University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
312384
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
312384
0
01/06/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
312384
0
11/08/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
312384
0
HC230351
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Neuropathic eye pain (NEP) is a debilitating pain condition that is difficult to treat. NEP remains minimally responsive to existing pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Although further studies are required to more definitively evaluate its efficacy as a treatment for alleviating NEP, there is growing evidence to suggest that electroencephalography (EEG) neurofeedback has the potential to reduce neuropathic eye pain. We have developed a novel EEG neurofeedback system to reduce NEP using openBCI technology, which incorporates the capturing and recording of EEG, and the delivery of neurofeedback via an interactive gaming interface. To achieve a reduction in NEP, we will use a neuromodulation protocol that targets and suppresses theta (4-8 Hz) and high beta frequency (20-30 Hz) power bands and enhances alpha (9-12 Hz) frequency power bands. A single-case experimental design (SCED) with multiple baselines will be used to examine the efficacy of our self-developed EEG neurofeedback treatment for the alleviation of NEP. Four participants with NEP will be recruited. Each participant will be randomly assigned to a different baseline phase (i.e., 7, 10, 13 or 16 days), which will then be followed by twenty 30-minute EEG neurofeedback sessions over a 4-week period. The Numerical Rating Scale will be used to assess average pain intensity, which will serve as the primary outcome measure. Pain interference will serve as the secondary outcome measure and will be measured using 6 items from the Brief Pain Inventory. Generalisation measures will be used to measure efficacy of the intervention beyond the primary and secondary outcomes and will assess quality of life, sleep quality, symptoms of anxiety and depression, mood and well-being. Satisfaction and feasibility of the intervention will be measured using self-reporting questionnaires and an unstructured interview. SCED trials are considered a viable alternative approach to randomised control trials when identifying evidence-based practices in the field of technology-based health interventions, when recruitment of large samples is not feasible.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
124470
0
Prof Sylvia Gustin
Query!
Address
124470
0
NeuroRecovery Research Hub, Level 1, Biolink Building
University of New South Wales
Kensington, NSW 2052
Query!
Country
124470
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124470
0
+61 2 9348 0846
Query!
Fax
124470
0
Query!
Email
124470
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
124471
0
Sylvia Gustin
Query!
Address
124471
0
NeuroRecovery Research Hub, Level 1, Biolink Building
University of New South Wales
Kensington, NSW 2052
Query!
Country
124471
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124471
0
+61 2 9348 0846
Query!
Fax
124471
0
Query!
Email
124471
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
124472
0
Sylvia Gustin
Query!
Address
124472
0
NeuroRecovery Research Hub, Level 1, Biolink Building
University of New South Wales
Kensington, NSW 2052
Query!
Country
124472
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124472
0
+61 2 9348 0846
Query!
Fax
124472
0
Query!
Email
124472
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
We do not yet have Ethics Approval for this trial.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF