Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000237684
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/02/2023
Date registered
6/03/2023
Date last updated
5/05/2023
Date data sharing statement initially provided
6/03/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Effect of Content Specificity in Interpretation Training for Adults with Social Anxiety Symptoms
Query!
Scientific title
Effect of Content Specificity in Cognitive Bias Modification on Interpretation Bias for Adults with Social Anxiety Symptoms
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
309084
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1289-0748
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Social anxiety
329147
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
326127
326127
0
0
Query!
Anxiety
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This study aims to examine the content specificity of Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations (CBM-I), by examining whether fear-domain match leads to greater changes in bias and symptoms than fear-domain mismatch. The study will focus on training adults with elevated levels of social anxiety towards positive and/or non-threatening interpretations of ambiguous situations. Participants will be randomly assigned to training scenarios that are relevant to social anxiety (content specific), or training scenarios that are associated with an irrelevant fear domain (fear of heights; non content specific).
The intervention will be a single session of CBM-I. The CBM-I intervention is expected to take approximately 60 minutes. Participants allocated to the intervention group will receive the CBM-I intervention with training scenarios that are relevant to social anxiety. Participants allocated to the control group will receive the CBM-I intervention with training scenarios that are related to an irrelevant fear domain (fear of heights). Participants will complete the intervention on a computer in a lab at Macquarie University. The intervention will be delivered via computer, with no direct experimenter involvement. One of the researchers will supervise each session in case of participant distress.
During the single-session intervention, participants will be presented with 60 ambiguous scenarios. During every trial, participants will be presented with a short 2-3 sentence scenario describing an uncertain situation that might happen to them. A benign or positive interpretation of the scenario is induced by the participant completing a word fragment (by typing a missing letter) which disambiguates the sentence. Next, a comprehension question is posed to check their understanding. This also accentuates the benign or positive interpretation of the scenario. All participants in the intervention group will receive the same scenarios. All participants in the control group will receive the same scenarios. An example of an ambiguous social scenario is provided below:
Scenario: You are giving a presentation in class. Everyone is staring at you as you speak. They are staring at you because you sound
Word fragment: inter_sting (missing letter = e)
Comprehension question: Is everyone staring at you because you sound interesting? (correct answer = yes)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
325528
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
This study will compare CBM-I training that is content specific (intervention group), to CBM-I training that is not consent specific (control group). The control group in this study will complete a single-session of CBM-I training, utilising ambiguous scenarios that are about an irrelevant anxiety domain (fear of heights).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
333993
0
The first primary outcome is interpretation bias. Interpretation bias will be measured using the Interpretation Recognition Task (IREC-T).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
333993
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
333993
0
Interpretation bias will be measured on the IREC-T immediately before (pre-training) and after (post-training) the single-session CBM-I intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
418981
0
Social anxiety symptoms will be measured using two related scales. The first scale is the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS). The SIAS measures social anxiety symptoms related to social interactions. The prompt for the scale will ask participants to answer as per their feelings/perspectives “right now” at each time point.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
418981
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
418981
0
Social anxiety symptoms will be measured on the SIAS immediately before (pre-training) and after (post-training) the single-session CBM-I intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
418982
0
Social anxiety symptoms will be measured using two related scales. The second scale is the Social Phobia Scale (SPS). The SPS measures social anxiety symptoms related to being observed or scrutinised during everyday situations. The prompt for the scale will ask participants to answer as per their feelings/perspectives “right now” at each time point.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
418982
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
418982
0
Social anxiety symptoms will be measured on the SPS immediately before (pre-training) and after (post-training) the single-session CBM-I intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
419225
0
The second secondary outcome is state anxiety, which will be measured using the anxiety-tension subscale of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-SF).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
419225
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
419225
0
State anxiety will be measured on the POMS-SF immediately before (pre-training) and after (post-training) the single-session CBM-I intervention.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
To be eligible for this study, participants will be required to meet the following criteria:
1) Aged 18 years and above
2) Fluent in English
3) Elevated symptoms of social anxiety (based on a cut off score on validated scales)
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1) No identified fear of heights
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Eligibility for inclusion in the trial will be determined automatically, based on participants' responses in the Qualtrics screener survey. The survey will determine eligibility based on answers to self-report questions. The Qualtrics survey will automatically score the self-report screening questions, and will only provide participants who meet the inclusion criteria with the code to enrol to participate in the study. Once participants elect to participate in the study, after the screening, participants will be randomly allocated (via computerised randomisation) to the intervention or control group. Given that determination of eligibility is conducted automatically by Qualtrics, and allocation is conducted via a computerised randomisation program, allocation is concealed.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation will be carried out using a computerised randomisation procedure.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
To determine the efficacy of the training on each of the primary (interpretation bias) and secondary (state anxiety and social anxiety), three separate 2 (group 1 vs group 2) x2 (pre-training vs post-training) mixed factorial analysis of variance tests will be conducted. Due to multiple planned AVNOVAs, p-values will be Bonferroni corrected for analysis.
Missing values are expected to be minimal due to the single-session design. In the case of missing values, if at least 80% of the scales were completed, means will be imputed for missing items.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/03/2023
Query!
Actual
22/03/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/09/2023
Query!
Actual
3/05/2023
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/09/2023
Query!
Actual
3/05/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
110
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
110
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
313287
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
313287
0
Macquarie University
Query!
Address [1]
313287
0
Macquarie University
Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park
NSW, Australia, 2109
Query!
Country [1]
313287
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Emily Daniel
Query!
Address
Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park NSW 2109
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
315027
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
315027
0
Dr Carly Johnco
Query!
Address [1]
315027
0
Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park NSW 2109
Query!
Country [1]
315027
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
282570
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
282570
0
Dr Gemma Sicouri
Query!
Address [1]
282570
0
Black Dog Institute, Hospital Road, Prince of Wales Hospital,
Randwick NSW 2031
Query!
Country [1]
282570
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
312517
0
Macquarie University - Human Research Ethics Committie
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
312517
0
Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park NSW 2109
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
312517
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
312517
0
30/10/2022
Query!
Approval date [1]
312517
0
13/12/2022
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
312517
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study aims to evaluate the factors that contribute to the success of a Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations (CBM-I) program. Specifically, the study will look at whether the content (or topic) of the training scenarios in the program needs to match participants’ anxiety concerns (e.g., social concerns) to be effective in modifying the ways that individuals interpret information. Adults with elevated symptoms of social anxiety will be randomly allocated to CBM-I training that matches their anxiety type (using social scenarios), or CBM-I training that does not match their anxiety type (using fear of heights scenarios). All participants will complete a single session of CBM-I, with 60 training scenarios. Interpretation bias, social anxiety symptoms, and state anxiety will be assessed immediately before and after the CBM-I training. We expect that that the group that receives training scenarios that matches their anxiety type (social) will demonstrated greater reductions in negative interpretation bias, social anxiety, and state anxiety from pre-training to post-training, compared to the group that is assigned scenarios that do not match their anxiety type (heights).
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
124942
0
Dr Carly Johnco
Query!
Address
124942
0
Macquarie University - Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park NSW 2109
Query!
Country
124942
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124942
0
+61 2 9850 8053
Query!
Fax
124942
0
Query!
Email
124942
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
124943
0
Emily Daniel
Query!
Address
124943
0
Macquarie University - Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park NSW 2109
Query!
Country
124943
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124943
0
+61 2 9065 9163
Query!
Fax
124943
0
Query!
Email
124943
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
124944
0
Emily Daniel
Query!
Address
124944
0
Macquarie University - Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park NSW 2109
Query!
Country
124944
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124944
0
+61 2 9065 9163
Query!
Fax
124944
0
Query!
Email
124944
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF