Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000813684p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
13/07/2023
Date registered
28/07/2023
Date last updated
28/07/2023
Date data sharing statement initially provided
28/07/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
MinDArT and a Memory Cafe: A crossover trial testing the effect of mindful drawing and social interventions on stress in people living with dementia and their supporters
Query!
Scientific title
MinDArT and a Memory Cafe: A crossover trial testing the effect of mindful drawing and social interventions on stress in people living with dementia and their supporters
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
309995
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Dementia
330685
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
327505
327505
0
0
Query!
Dementias
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
MinDArT is an eight-week dual-care programme for people with dementia and their supporters. Each 90 minute weekly session involves groups of 9 people with dementia undertaking custom-designed material and digital drawing exercises, while their supporters in an adjacent room undertake the same drawing programme. The drawing programme is inspired by nature, engaging as many senses as possible and applying repetitive drawing movements. Each session utilises natural resources, traditional drawing materials and a specially designed digital drawing application. The MinDArT digital applications are unique to the programme.
Additionally, each participant is given a digital tablet for the duration of the programme so that they can repeat the sessions at home. This allows them to access the benefits of the digital drawing programme at their own leisure until they are presented with the next instalment the following week.
MinDArT combines the principles of mindfulness with the meditative qualities of drawing, and incorporates physical creative activities with specially designed digital art activities on tablets.
The sessions will be run by the principal researcher (art lecturer) and Dementia Wellington Advisor. Session attendance will be recorded on a checklist.
There will be a 10 week washout period between each stage.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
326519
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The participants will take part in eight 90 minute weekly Memory Cafe sessions. The involves a group of 9 people living with dementia and their care-partners meeting informally in a community location such as a neighbourhood cafe. The primary activity is informed discussion. A key aim of Memory Cafés is to increase the opportunity for connections with and social support for people with dementia and carers in a shared community setting.The format of the Memory Café used in this study is based on dementia Australia’s recommendation laid out in the manual ““Community Café Toolkit: Your manual and tools for establishing a café for people living with dementia” (Watson, Abbato, Westley, O’Louglin, and Costelloe, 2016). This will be facilitated by the principal researcher and past facilitators of MinDArT.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
335366
0
Outcome: Stress
Measure: Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, 1994)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
335366
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
335366
0
Pre-evaluation (baseline) versus post-evaluation (8 weeks post-baseline).
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
424119
0
Outcome: Well-being
Measure: The World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5; World Health Organization, Regional office for Europe, 1998; Beech, 2004)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
424119
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
424119
0
Pre-evaluation (baseline) versus post-evaluation (8 weeks post-baseline).
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
424120
0
Outcome: Positive feelings about the support role for carers
Measure: Subscales from Caregiver Reaction Scale (CRS; Qualls & Kenny, 2008)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
424120
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
424120
0
Pre-evaluation (baseline) versus post-evaluation (8 weeks post-baseline).
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
424121
0
Outcome: Negative feelings about the support role for carers
Measure: Zarit 4-item Burden Scale (ZBI-4) (Bedard et al., 2001)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
424121
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
424121
0
Pre-evaluation (baseline) versus post-evaluation (8 weeks post-baseline).
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
424122
0
Outcome: Quality of life for people living with dementia
Measure: Dementia Quality of Life Instrument (DQOL) (Brod et al. in 1999)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
424122
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
424122
0
Pre-evaluation (baseline) versus post-evaluation (8 weeks post-baseline).
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
424123
0
Outcome: Manual dexterity
Participants: People living with dementia
Measure: The 9 hole peg test (Kellor et al. (1971; Mathiowetz et al, 1985)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
424123
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
424123
0
Pre-evaluation (baseline) versus post-evaluation (8 weeks post-baseline).
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
424124
0
Outcome: Cognition
Participants: People living with dementia
Measure: RUDAS (Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale, Story et al, 2004)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
424124
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
424124
0
Pre-evaluation (baseline) versus post-evaluation (8 weeks post-baseline).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
The research is designed to be inclusive and will not exclude participants on the basis of their sexual orientation, gender, place of residence, ethnicity, nationality, religion, education or socioeconomic status.
The inclusion criteria are:
• Capacity to give informed consent to participate in this research.
• Able to converse in English without an interpreter
• The other half of dyad is available to participate (ie; carer)
• Service agency staff’s judgement that the person living with dementia will be able to comfortably meet the cognitive and communication demands of participating in this type of group session
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria are:
• Significant visual or hearing impairment to an extent that would make engagement in a group environment difficult.
• An activated enduring power of attorney for personal welfare and care (or clinician advice that they are cognitively unable to give informed consent).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
ANCOVA mixed model and standardised mean change
Sample size of 36 for crossover trial : 36 people living with dementia and 36 carers. This is adequate for medium effect size, alpha=.05, beta=.20
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
14/08/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/09/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/06/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
72
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
25643
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
25643
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
314172
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
314172
0
Massey Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
314172
0
Massey University Foundation
Room 2.04
Refectory Building
Massey University
Tennent Drive
Palmerston North 4474
Query!
Country [1]
314172
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Massey University
Query!
Address
Research Office
Massey University
Palmerston North 4474
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
316220
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
316220
0
Query!
Address [1]
316220
0
Query!
Country [1]
316220
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
313303
0
Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
313303
0
PO Box 5013, Wellington 6140
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
313303
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
313303
0
19/07/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
313303
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
313303
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study investigates the impact of MinDArT, an art-based mindfulness programme for people living with dementia and their care-partners, compared to a Memory Café intervention. The study uses a cross-over design: half the participants will participate in MinDArT first then Memory Café. The other half will participate Memory Café first, then MinDArT. Our hypotheses are: (Windle et al. 2002) 1. MinDArT has a positive impact on how people feel (well-being, stress, and quality of life) and on what people can do (fine motor skills and thinking and memory skills) for people living with dementia. This change is greater than that for the Memory Cafe. 2. Well-being and stress will improve for supporters when taking part in MinDArT. This change will be greater than that for the Memory Cafe intervention. 3. Taking part in MinDArT will be an engaging and positive experience. There will be a higher level of individual engagement for people living with dementia in MinDArT sessions compared to Memory Cafe sessions. We will also document the perceived benefits of MinDArT and Memory Cafe membership, and the similarities and difference between them.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
127662
0
A/Prof Emma Febvre-Richards
Query!
Address
127662
0
Whiti o Rehua School of Art
College of Creative Arts
Massey University Wellington
Wallace Street
Wellington 6021
Query!
Country
127662
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
127662
0
+64 212544088
Query!
Fax
127662
0
Query!
Email
127662
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
127663
0
Emma Febvre-Richards
Query!
Address
127663
0
Whiti o Rehua School of Art
College of Creative Arts
Massey University Wellington
Wallace Street
Wellington 6021
Query!
Country
127663
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
127663
0
+64 212544088
Query!
Fax
127663
0
Query!
Email
127663
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
127664
0
Susan Gee
Query!
Address
127664
0
Portocom A
Burwood Hospital
Private Bag 4708
Christchurch 8140
Query!
Country
127664
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
127664
0
+64 21 0233 3355
Query!
Fax
127664
0
Query!
Email
127664
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Confidentiality of participants in study on basis of informed consent
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF