Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01761266
Registration number
NCT01761266
Ethics application status
Date submitted
2/01/2013
Date registered
4/01/2013
Date last updated
5/04/2022
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib (E7080) Versus Sorafenib in First-line Treatment of Participants With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib (E7080) Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2012-002992-33
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
E7080-G000-304
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Non melanoma skin cancer
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Kidney
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Liver
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Lenvatinib
Treatment: Drugs - Sorafenib
Active comparator: Lenvatinib - Participants received lenvatinib capsules 12 milligram (mg) based on the participant's body weight greater than or equal to (\>=) 60 kilogram (kg) or 8 mg based on the participant's body weight less than (\<) 60 kg at baseline, orally, once daily (QD) in continuous 28-day treatment cycles up to documented disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent.
Active comparator: Sorafenib - Participants received sorafenib 400 mg tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day treatment cycles up to documented disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent.
Treatment: Drugs: Lenvatinib
12 mg (or 8 mg) once daily (QD) oral dosing.
Treatment: Drugs: Sorafenib
400 mg twice daily (BID) oral dosing.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
OS was defined as the duration from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, and participants who remained alive were censored at the time of data cutoff.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From date of randomization until date of death from any cause (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), or date of death, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Time to Progression (TTP)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on mRECIST. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
The time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on mRECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement of arterial phase) target lesions taking as reference to the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
The EORTC QLQ-C30 included 30 questions comprising 9 multi-item scales: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social) and 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting, dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties) and a single global health and QOL status score. Most questions used a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). All domain scores were calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline up to Off-Treatment Visit (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of HRQoL Assessed Using - EORTC QLQ- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Domain (HCC 18)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The EORTC QLQ-HCC-18 was an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30. EORTC QLQ-HCC 18 questionnaire included 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. Each individual item ranges from 1 to 4, where 1 = "not at all" and 4 = "very much." All domain scores were calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represented a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represented a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represented a high level of symptomatology/problem. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline up to Off-Treatment Visit (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Time to Clinically Meaningful Worsening of HRQoL Assessed Using EuroQol Five Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The EuroQol five dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) assesses quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rate 5 aspects of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The summed score ranges from 3-15 with "3" corresponding to no problems and "15" corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions. EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health). Decrease from baseline in EQ-5D-3L signifies improvement. Total index EQ-5D-3L summary score was weighted with a range of -0.594 (worst) to 1.0 (best). EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ health utilities index (HUI) where 1.00 indicated perfect health while a score of 0.00 indicated death. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline up to Off-Treatment Visit (approximately up to 3.8 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
AUC was assessed on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15. Summarized data for all time points was reported. As planned, data for this secondary endpoint was collected and analyzed up to the primary completion date.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5-4 and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 2-12 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Participants must have confirmed diagnosis of unresectable HCC with any of the following criteria:
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC.
* Clinically confirmed diagnosis of HCC according to American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria, including cirrhosis of any etiology or with chronic hepatitis B or C infection criteria
2. At least one measurable target lesion according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) meeting the following criteria:
• Hepatic lesion
1. The lesion can be accurately measured in at least one dimension as >=1.0 centimeter (cm) (viable tumor for typical; and longest diameter for atypical), and
2. The lesion is suitable for repeat measurement.
• Nonhepatic lesion
3. Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least one dimension as >=1.5 cm in the short axis, except for porta hepatis LN that measures >=2.0 cm in the short axis.
4. Non-nodal lesion that measures >=1.0 cm in the longest diameter Lesions previously treated with radiotherapy or locoregional therapy must show radiographic evidence of disease progression to be deemed a target lesion.
3. Participants categorized to stage B (not applicable for transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]) or stage C based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system.
4. Adequate bone marrow function, defined as:
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1.5 X 10^9 per liter (/L)
* Hemoglobin (Hb) >=8.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL)
* Platelet count >=75 X 10^9/L.
5. Adequate liver function, defined as:
* Albumin >=2.8 g/dL
* Bilirubin less than or equal to (<=) 3.0 mg/dL
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <=5 X the upper limit of normal (ULN).
6. Adequate blood coagulation function, defined as international normalized ratio (INR) <=2.3.
7. Adequate renal function defined as creatinine clearance greater than (>) 40 milliliter per minute (mL/min) calculated per the Cockcroft and Gault formula.
8. Adequate pancreatic function, defined as amylase and lipase <=1.5 X ULN.
9. Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with up to 3 antihypertensive agents, defined as BP <=150/90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) at Screening and no change in antihypertensive therapy within 1 week prior to the Cycle1/Day1.
10. Child-Pugh score A.
11. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)- performance status (PS) 0 or 1.
12. Males or females aged at least 18 years (or any age >18 years as determined by country legislation) at the time of informed consent.
13. Females must not be lactating or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [B-hCG] test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 International Units Per Liter (IU/L) or equivalent units of BhCG).
A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug.
14. All females will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless they are postmenopausal (amenorrheic for at least 12 consecutive months, in the appropriate age group and without other known or suspected cause) or have been sterilized surgically (ie, bilateral tubal ligation, total hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, all with surgery at least 1 month before dosing).
15. Females of childbearing potential must not have had unprotected sexual intercourse within 30 days before study entry and must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (e.g., total abstinence, an intrauterine device, a double barrier method [such as condom plus diaphragm with spermicide], a contraceptive implant, an oral contraceptive, or have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia) throughout the entire study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. If currently abstinent, the participant must agree to use a double barrier method as described above if she becomes sexually active during the study period or for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. Females who are using hormonal contraceptives must have been on a stable dose of the same hormonal contraceptive product for at least 4 weeks before dosing and must continue to use the same contraceptive during the study and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation.
16. Male participants must have had a successful vasectomy (confirmed azoospermia) or they and their female partners must meet the criteria above (i.e., not of childbearing potential or practicing highly effective contraception throughout the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation). No sperm donation is allowed during the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation.
17. Provide written informed consent.
18. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1. Imaging findings for HCC corresponding to any of the following:
* HCC with >=50 percent liver occupation
* Clear invasion into the bile duct
* Portal vein invasion at the main portal branch (Vp4).
2. Participants who have received any systemic chemotherapy, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer agents, including lenvatinib, for advanced/unresectable HCC. Note: Participants who have received local hepatic injection chemotherapy are eligible.
3. Participants who have received any anticancer therapy (including surgery, percutaneous ethanol injection, radio frequency ablation, transarterial [chemo] embolization, hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy, biological, immunotherapy, hormonal, or radiotherapy) or any blood enhancing treatment (including blood transfusion, blood products, or agents that stimulate blood cell production, eg, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) within 28 days prior to randomization.
4. Participants who have not recovered from toxicities as a result of prior anticancer therapy, except alopecia and infertility. Recovery is defined as < Grade 2 severity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0).
5. Significant cardiovascular impairment: history of congestive heart failure > New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 months of the first dose of study drug, or cardiac arrhythmia requiring medical treatment at Screening.
6. Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) interval to >480 millisecond (ms)
7. Gastrointestinal malabsorption or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib in the opinion of the investigator.
8. Bleeding or thrombotic disorders or use of anticoagulants requiring therapeutic INR monitoring, eg, warfarin or similar agents. Treatment with low molecular weight heparin and factor X inhibitors which do not require INR monitoring is permitted. Antiplatelet agents are prohibited throughout the study.
9. Gastrointestinal bleeding event or active hemoptysis (bright red blood of at least 0.5 teaspoon) within 28 days prior to randomization.
10. Gastric or esophageal varices that require interventional treatment within 28 days prior to randomization. Prophylaxis with pharmacologic therapy (eg, nonselective beta-blocker) is permitted.
11. Active malignancy (except for HCC or definitively treated melanoma in-situ, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix) within the past 36 months.
12. Participants whose only target lesion(s) is in bone will be excluded.
13. Meningeal carcinomatosis.
14. Any history of or current brain or subdural metastases.
15. Participants having >1+ proteinuria on urine dipstick testing will undergo a 24-hour urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with a urine protein >=1g/24 hours will be ineligible.
16. Surgical arterial-portal venous shunt or arterial-venous shunt.
17. Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study.
18. Known intolerance to lenvatinib or sorafenib (or any of the excipients).
19. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive or active infection requiring treatment (except for hepatitis virus).
20. Any history of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within the prior 6 months.
21. Any participant who cannot be evaluated by either triphasic liver computed tomography (CT) or triphasic liver Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) because of allergy or other contraindication to both CT and MRI contrast agents.
22. Major surgery within 3 weeks prior to randomization or scheduled for surgery during the study.
23. Participants has had a liver transplant.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/03/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
10/03/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
954
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Facility # 1 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Facility # 1 - Wentworthville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Facility # 1 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Facility # 1 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Facility # 1 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Facility # 2 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Facility # 1 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Wentworthville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
- Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Edegem
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Liege
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Anhui
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Chongqing
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Fujian
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Guangdong
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Heilongjiang
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Hunan
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Jiangsu
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Jilin
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Liaoning
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Shandong
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Shanxi
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Zhejiang
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Alpes Maritimes
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Gironde
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Haute Garonne
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Herault
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Ille Et Vilaine
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Meurthe Et Moselle
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Somme
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Val De Marne
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Bordeaux
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Lille cedex
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Nord
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Paris cedex 12
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Rhone
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Baden Wuerttemberg
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Hessen
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Niedersachsen
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Nordrhein Westfalen
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Rheinland Pfalz
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Kowloon
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Petach Tikva
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Petah Tiqwa
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Ancona
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Bari
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Benevento
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Palermo
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Aichi
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Chiba
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Ehime
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Fukuoka
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Hokkaido
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Hyogo
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Ishikawa
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Mie
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Nagasaki
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Osaka
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Yamaguchi
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Hiroshima
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Saga
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
Gyeonggi-do
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Gyeongsangbuk-do
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Jeollanam-do
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Incheon
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Pahang
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Pulau Pinang
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Sarawak
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Selangor
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Cebu City
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Davao City
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Quezon City
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Arkhangelsk
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Saint Petersburg
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Ufa
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Cantabria
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
Badajoz
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Girona
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Kaohsiung
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
Tainan
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [110]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [110]
0
0
Taoyuan City
Query!
Country [111]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [111]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Country [112]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [112]
0
0
Chiang Mai
Query!
Country [113]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [113]
0
0
Chiang Rai
Query!
Country [114]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [114]
0
0
Greater London
Query!
Country [115]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [115]
0
0
Greater Manchester
Query!
Country [116]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [116]
0
0
Merseyside
Query!
Country [117]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [117]
0
0
Strathclyde
Query!
Country [118]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [118]
0
0
West Midlands
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Eisai Limited
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
E7080-G000-304 is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib versus sorafenib as a first-line systemic treatment in participants with unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01761266
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Cheng AL, Vogel A, Tovoli F, Ueshima K, Aikata H, Lopez CL, Pracht M, Meng Z, Daniele B, Park JW, Palmer D, Tamai T, Saito K, Dutcus CE, Lencioni R. Overall survival and objective response in advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A subanalysis of the REFLECT study. J Hepatol. 2023 Jan;78(1):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Sep 20. Huynh J, Cho MT, Kim EJ, Ren M, Ramji Z, Vogel A. Lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed to Child-Pugh B liver function. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Aug 24;14:17588359221116608. doi: 10.1177/17588359221116608. eCollection 2022. Vogel A, Qin S, Kudo M, Su Y, Hudgens S, Yamashita T, Yoon JH, Fartoux L, Simon K, Lopez C, Sung M, Mody K, Ohtsuka T, Tamai T, Bennett L, Meier G, Breder V. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib for first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;6(8):649-658. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00110-2. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Okusaka T, Ikeda K, Kudo M, Finn R, Qin S, Han KH, Cheng AL, Piscaglia F, Kobayashi M, Sung M, Chen M, Wyrwicz L, Yoon JH, Ren Z, Mody K, Dutcus C, Tamai T, Ren M, Hayato S, Kumada H. Safety and efficacy of lenvatinib by starting dose based on body weight in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in REFLECT. J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun;56(6):570-580. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01785-0. Epub 2021 May 4. Briggs A, Daniele B, Dick K, Evans TRJ, Galle PR, Hubner RA, Lopez C, Siebert U, Tremblay G. Covariate-adjusted analysis of the Phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2020 Jun;122(12):1754-1759. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0817-7. Epub 2020 Apr 8. Yamashita T, Kudo M, Ikeda K, Izumi N, Tateishi R, Ikeda M, Aikata H, Kawaguchi Y, Wada Y, Numata K, Inaba Y, Kuromatsu R, Kobayashi M, Okusaka T, Tamai T, Kitamura C, Saito K, Haruna K, Okita K, Kumada H. REFLECT-a phase 3 trial comparing efficacy and safety of lenvatinib to sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of Japanese subset. J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;55(1):113-122. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01642-1. Epub 2019 Nov 12. Evans TRJ, Kudo M, Finn RS, Han KH, Cheng AL, Ikeda M, Kraljevic S, Ren M, Dutcus CE, Piscaglia F, Sung MW. Urine protein:creatinine ratio vs 24-hour urine protein for proteinuria management: analysis from the phase 3 REFLECT study of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul;121(3):218-221. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0506-6. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Erratum In: Br J Cancer. 2019 Oct;121(7):625. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0534-2. Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, Baron A, Park JW, Han G, Jassem J, Blanc JF, Vogel A, Komov D, Evans TRJ, Lopez C, Dutcus C, Guo M, Saito K, Kraljevic S, Tamai T, Ren M, Cheng AL. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1163-1173. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01761266
Download to PDF