Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01755143
Registration number
NCT01755143
Ethics application status
Date submitted
18/12/2012
Date registered
24/12/2012
Date last updated
20/07/2015
Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluation of Approved Pacing Lead (Model 5076) for Use in MRI Environment
Query!
Scientific title
CapSureFix® Novus Model 5076 Lead MRI Study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
5076 MRI
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
0
0
Query!
Cardiac Pacing
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: MRI Group - Subjects randomized to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging group will undergo a series of MRI scans at the 9-12 week visit post-implant.
Sham comparator: Control Group - Subjects randomized to the control group will not undergo a series of MRI scans but will come into the study office for a one hour waiting period at the 9-12 week post-implant visit.
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
MRI-related Complication Free Rate
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Number of patients free of MRI-related complications
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
MRI scan to one month later
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Proportion of Subjects Who Experience an Increase Less Than or Equal to 0.5V in Atrial Voltage Thresholds
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Subjects' atrial pacing capture threshold was measured at the 9-12 week visit (pre-MRI/waiting period) and the 4-month visit (i.e. one month post-MRI/waiting period). A success was when a subject experienced an increase less than or equal to 0.5V (volts) between the two visits.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Pre-MRI/waiting period (9-12 weeks post implant) to one month post-MRI/waiting period
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Proportion of Subjects Who Experience an Increase Less Than or Equal to 0.5V in Ventricular Voltage Thresholds
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Subjects' ventricular pacing capture threshold was measured at the 9-12 week visit (pre-MRI/waiting period) and the 4-month visit (i.e. one month post-MRI/waiting period). A success was when a subject experienced an increase less than or equal to 0.5V (volts) between the two visits.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Pre-MRI/waiting period (9-12 weeks post implant) to one month post-MRI/waiting period
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Proportion of Subjects Who Experience a Decrease Less Than or Equal to 50% in Atrial Sensing Amplitude
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Subjects' atrial sensed amplitude was measured at the 9-12 week visit (pre-MRI/waiting period) and the 4-month visit (i.e. one month post-MRI/waiting period). A success was defined as a 50% or less decrease in atrial sensed amplitude between the two visits.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Pre-MRI /waiting period (9-12 weeks post-implant) to 1-month post-MRI/waiting period
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Occurrence of Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias and Asystole During MRI Scans.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The endpoint was the occurrence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias and asystole during MRI scans and attributable to the MR scan. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias or asystole episodes that occurred during the MRI scan was considered attributable to the MR scan if so adjudicated by the Adverse Events Adjudication Committee
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
During MRI scans (9-12 weeks post-implant)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Proportion of Subjects Who Experience a Decrease Less Than or Equal to 50% in Ventricular Sensing Amplitude
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Subjects' ventricular sensed amplitude was measured at the 9-12 week visit (pre-MRI/waiting period) and the 4-month visit (i.e. one month post-MRI/waiting period). A success was defined as a 50% or less decrease in ventricular sensed amplitude between the two visits.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Pre-MRI/waiting period (9-12 weeks post implant) to one month post-MRI/waiting period
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subjects who have Class I and II indication for implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker according to the ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines
* Subjects who are able to undergo a pectoral implant
* Subjects who:
* are receiving an IPG for the first time, OR
* are receiving a replacement IPG connected to two previously- implanted (atrial and ventricular) Model 5076 leads
* Subjects who are able and willing to undergo elective MRI scanning without sedation
* Subjects who are geographically stable and available for follow-up at the study site for the length of the study
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Subjects with a mechanical tricuspid heart valve.
* Subjects with a history of significant tricuspid valvular disease.
* Subjects for whom a single dose of 1.0mg dexamethasone acetate may be contraindicated.
* Subjects who require a legally authorized representative to obtain consent.
* Subjects who have abandoned (inactive) pacemaker and/or defibrillator leads
* Subjects who are immediate candidates for an ICD.
* Subjects who require an indicated MRI scan, other than those specifically described in the study, before the one-month post MRI/waiting period follow-up.
* Subjects with previously implanted active medical devices (exception Model 5076 Lead and Advisa MRI IPG).
* Subjects with a non-MRI compatible device (such as ICDs or neurostimulators) or material implant (e.g., non-MRI compatible sternal wires, neurostimulators, biostimulators, metals or alloys).
* Subjects with medical conditions that preclude the testing required by the protocol or limit study participation.
* Subjects who are enrolled or intend to participate in another clinical trial (of an investigational drug or device, new indication for an approved drug or device, or requirement of additional testing beyond standard clinical practice) during this clinical study.
* Pregnant women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control.
* Subjects with exclusion criteria required by local law (e.g., age, breastfeeding).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
NA
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/12/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/10/2013
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
266
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Saint George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Flinders Medical Centre - Bedford Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
5042 - Bedford Park
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Sankt Pölten
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Arlon
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Gilly
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Chile
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Santiago
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Colombia
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Bogota
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Bremen
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Jena
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Ulm
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Haryana
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Bangalore
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Chandigarh
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Jaipur
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Mumbai
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
New Delhi
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Punjab
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Den Haag
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Nieuwegein
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Rotterdam
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Saudi Arabia
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Riyadh
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Belgrade
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Sremska Kamenica
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Pretoria
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Fribourg
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Lausanne
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of the Medtronic CapSureFix Novus Model 5076 lead when patients are implanted with the Medtronic Advisa MRI pacemaker and undergo an MRI scan.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01755143
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01755143
Download to PDF