Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01724866
Registration number
NCT01724866
Ethics application status
Date submitted
24/10/2012
Date registered
12/11/2012
Titles & IDs
Public title
Phase 2 Study of SPI-2012 or Pegfilgrastim for the Management of Neutropenia in Participants With Breast Cancer
Query!
Scientific title
Phase 2, Open-Label, Dose-Ranging Study of SPI-2012 (HM10460A) or Pegfilgrastim Use for the Management of Neutropenia in Patients With Breast Cancer Who Are Candidates for Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With the Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) Regimen
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2013-003094-10
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
SPI-GCF-12-201
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Neutropenia
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other blood disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - SPI-2012
Treatment: Drugs - Pegfilgrastim
Treatment: Drugs - Docetaxel
Treatment: Drugs - Cyclophosphamide
Experimental: Arm 1: SPI-2012 45 µg/kg and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) - Participants received SPI-2012 45 microgram/kilogram (µg/kg), subcutaneously (SC) once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24 hours after the administration of TC chemotherapy. TC chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 of each cycle as follows:
Docetaxel 75 milligram/ square metre (mg/m\^2) intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 minutes and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion over 30-60 minutes.
Experimental: Arm 2: SPI-2012 135 µg/kg and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) - Participants received SPI-2012 135 µg/kg, SC once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24 hours after the administration of TC chemotherapy. TC chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 of each cycle as follows:
Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 minutes and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion over 30-60 minutes.
Experimental: Arm 3: SPI-2012 270 µg/kg and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) - Participants received SPI-2012 270 µg/kg, SC once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24 hours after the administration of TC chemotherapy. TC chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 of each cycle as follows:
Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 minutes and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion over 30-60 minutes.
Experimental: Arm 4: Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) - Participants received Pegfilgrastim 6 milligram (mg), SC once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24 hours after the administration of TC chemotherapy. TC chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 of each cycle as follows:
Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 60 minutes and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion over 30-60 minutes.
Treatment: Drugs: SPI-2012
SPI-2012 SC injection.
Treatment: Drugs: Pegfilgrastim
Pegfilgrastim SC injection, per manufacturer's Prescribing Information.
Treatment: Drugs: Docetaxel
Docetaxel given based on standard dose for chemotherapy.
Treatment: Drugs: Cyclophosphamide
Cyclophosphamide given based on standard dose for chemotherapy.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
DSN was defined as the interval from the day of first observation of severe neutropenia (ANC \<0.5\*10\^9/L, Grade 4 neutropenia per NCI CTCAE) to the first ANC recovery to =\> 2.0\*10\^9/L in Cycle 1.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Duration of DSN in Cycle 2
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
DSN was defined as the interval from the day of first observation of severe neutropenia (ANC \<0.5\*10\^9/L, Grade 4 neutropenia per NCI CTCAE) to the first ANC recovery to =\> 2.0\*10\^9/L in Cycle 2.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Cycle 2 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Duration of DSN in Cycle 3
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
DSN was defined as the interval from the day of first observation of severe neutropenia (ANC \<0.5\*10\^9/L, Grade 4 neutropenia per NCI CTCAE) to the first ANC recovery to =\> 2.0\*10\^9/L in Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Cycle 3 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Duration of DSN in Cycle 4
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
DSN was defined as the interval from the day of first observation of severe neutropenia (ANC \<0.5\*10\^9/L, Grade 4 neutropenia per NCI CTCAE) to the first ANC recovery to =\> 2.0\*10\^9/L in Cycle 4.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Time to ANC Recovery in Cycle 1
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Time to ANC recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until ANC increased to = 2×10\^9/L after the expected nadir within Cycle 1. Time to ANC recovery was not calculated for participants whose ANC value didn't drop below 2 x10\^9/L within Cycle 1.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Time to ANC Recovery in Cycle 2
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Time to ANC recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until ANC increased to =2×10\^9/L after the expected nadir within Cycle 2. Time to ANC recovery was not calculated for participants whose ANC value didn't drop below 2 x10\^9/L within Cycle 2.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Cycle 2 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Time to ANC Recovery in Cycle 3
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Time to ANC recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until ANC increased to =2×10\^9/L after the expected nadir within Cycle 3. Time to ANC recovery was not calculated for participants whose ANC value didn't drop below 2 x10\^9/L within Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Cycle 3 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Time to ANC Recovery in Cycle 4
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Time to ANC recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until ANC increased to =2×10\^9/L after the expected nadir within Cycle 4. Time to ANC recovery was not calculated for participants whose ANC value didn't drop below 2 x10\^9/L within Cycle 4.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Nadir Overtime in Cycle 1
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Mean ANC nadir was defined as the mean of the lowest ANC value (\*10\^9/L) after administration of the study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) on any day in Days 1-3 of Cycle 1.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Absolute ANC Nadir Overtime in Cycle 2
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Mean ANC nadir was defined as the mean of the lowest ANC value (\*10\^9/L) after administration of the study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) on any day in Days 1-3 of Cycle 2.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Cycle 2 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Absolute ANC Nadir Overtime in Cycle 3
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Mean ANC nadir was defined as the mean of the lowest ANC value (\*10\^9/L) after administration of the study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) on any day in Days 1-3 of Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Cycle 3 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Absolute ANC Nadir Overtime in Cycle 4
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Mean ANC nadir was defined as the mean of the lowest ANC value (\*10\^9/L) after administration of the study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) on any day in Days 1-3 of Cycle 4.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Depth of ANC Nadir in Cycle 1
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Depth of ANC nadir was defined as the lowest Median ANC value (\*10\^9/L) after administration of the study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) on any day in Days 1-3 of Cycle 1.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Depth of ANC Nadir in Cycle 2
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Depth of ANC nadir was defined as the lowest Median ANC value (\*10\^9/L) after administration of the study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) on any day in Days 1-3 of Cycle 2.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Cycle 2 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Depth of ANC Nadir in Cycle 3
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Depth of ANC nadir was defined as the lowest Median ANC value (\*10\^9/L) after administration of the study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) on any day in Days 1-3 of Cycle 3.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Cycle 3 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Depth of ANC Nadir in Cycle 4
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Depth of ANC nadir was defined as the lowest Median ANC value (\*10\^9/L) after administration of the study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim) on any day in Days 1-3 of Cycle 4.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Time to ANC Nadir in Cycle 1
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Time to ANC nadir was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until the occurrence of the ANC nadir.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Time to ANC Nadir in Cycle 2
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Time to ANC nadir was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until the occurrence of the ANC nadir.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Cycle 2 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Time to ANC Nadir in Cycle 3
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Time to ANC nadir was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until the occurrence of the ANC nadir.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Cycle 3 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Time to ANC Nadir in Cycle 4
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Time to ANC nadir was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until the occurrence of the ANC nadir.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) Across All Cycles From Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
FN was defined as a temperature of more than 38.2 degree Celsius (°C) concurrent with an ANC greater than 0.5×10\^9/L..
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Cycle 1 to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Number of Participants With Worst Grade Adverse Events (AEs), Deaths, Other Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Other AEs Leading to Discontinuation From Study Therapy, and Worst Grade Laboratory Abnormalities
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly. Participants with SAE other than death were reported.AE and Laboratory Abnormalities ("Hematology and Chemistry") were collected and graded as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 4.03, where Grade 3 refers to severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated and Grade 4 refers to life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
From the first dose up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (up to 4 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Hospitalization Across All Cycles From Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
All cycles from Cycle 1 to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Number of Participants With Positive Antibodies for SPI-2012
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Serum samples were to be tested in a screening assay for antibodies binding to SPI-2012 using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Any serum samples positive for the antibody were to be tested in a confirmatory competitive inhibition assay using two antigens, SPI-2012 or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), to confirm the presence of antibodies binding to SPI-2012 and to identify samples that were positive for antibodies binding to G-CSF.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Up to the end of the study (Approximately 3.5 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration of SPI-2012 (Tmax)
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Blood samples were collected at specific time points to determine the serum concentrations of SPI-2012 and to derive pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Pre-dose and at 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 24, 48, 72, 144, 192, and 312 hours post-dose in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Maximum Concentration of SPI-2012 (Cmax)
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Blood samples were collected at specific time points to determine the serum concentrations of SPI-2012 and to derive PK parameters.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Pre-dose and at 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 24, 48, 72, 144, 192, and 312 hours post-dose in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 312 Hours Post-Dose (AUC0-312)
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
AUC(0-312) is the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to 312 hour post dose calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule. Blood samples were collected at specific time points to determine the serum concentrations of SPI-2012 and to derive PK parameters.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Pre-dose and at 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 24, 48, 72, 144, 192, and 312 hours post-dose in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Half-life of SPI-2012 (t1/2)
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
t1/2 data were calculated and reported as harmonic mean and pseudo standard deviation (SD). Blood samples were collected at specific time points to determine the serum concentrations of SPI-2012 and to derive PK parameters.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Pre-dose and at 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 24, 48, 72, 144, 192, and 312 hours post-dose in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed breast cancer and candidate for adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy
* Candidate for docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy
* Female or male at least 18 years of age
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) = 2
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1.5×109/L
* Platelet count = 100 x 10^9/L
* Creatinine = 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Total bilirubin =1.5 mg/dL(= 25.65 µmol/L).
* Aspartate aminotransferase per serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) and/or alanine aminotransferase per serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) = 2.5 x ULN
* Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL
* Alkaline phosphatase = 1.5 x ULN
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Known sensitivity to E. coli-derived products or known sensitivity to any of the products to be administered
* Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection
* Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) diagnosis with detectable viral load or immunological evidence of chronic active disease
* Active infection or any serious underlying medical condition that would impair ability to receive protocol treatment
* Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplant
* Prolonged exposure to glucocorticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/03/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
12/08/2014
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
148
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Frankston Hospital - Frankston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Royal Hobart - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Ashford Cancer Center Research - Kurralta Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Breast Cancer Research Center, WA - Perth
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Ballarat Oncology & Haematology - Wendouree
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3199 - Frankston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
7000 - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
5037 - Kurralta Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
6000 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3355 - Wendouree
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Batumi
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Tbilisi
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Nyíregyháza
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Zefat
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Grudziadz
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Kraków
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Racibórz
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of test doses of SPI-2012 on the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) during Cycle 1 in participants with breast cancer who are candidates for adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01724866
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Vacirca JL, Chan A, Mezei K, Adoo CS, Papai Z, McGregor K, Okera M, Horvath Z, Landherr L, Hanslik J, Hager SJ, Ibrahim EN, Rostom M, Bhat G, Choi MR, Reddy G, Tedesco KL, Agajanian R, Lang I, Schwartzberg LS. An open-label, dose-ranging study of Rolontis, a novel long-acting myeloid growth factor, in breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2018 May;7(5):1660-1669. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1388. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01724866