Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02335944
Registration number
NCT02335944
Ethics application status
Date submitted
9/10/2014
Date registered
12/01/2015
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Safety and Efficacy of EGFR-TKI EGF816 in Combination With cMET Inhibitor INC280 in Adult Patients With EGFR Mutated Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase Ib/II, Multicenter, Open-label Study of EGF816 in Combination With INC280 in Adult Patients With EGFR Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2014-000726-37
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CINC280X2105C
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lung - Mesothelioma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lung - Non small cell
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lung - Small cell
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Capmatinib
Treatment: Drugs - Nazartinib
Experimental: Phase IB part- NSCLC with EGFR activating mutations - NSCLC participants who have previously documented EGFR mutation and progressed on EGFR TKI treatment. Participants were treated at a starting dose of 50 mg once a day for EGF816 and 200 mg twice a day for INC280 in fasted state
Experimental: Phase II- Group 1 (EGFRmut, any T790M, any MET, 2/4L antineoplastic, EGFR TKI resistant) - NSCLC participants with previously documented activating EGFR mutation, with any T790M and MET dysregulation status, who received one to three lines of systemic antineoplastic therapy prior to study entry including one line maximum of first or second generation EGFR TKI and who progressed on this EGFR TKI treatment line. Participants were treated at the RP2D of INC280 and EGF816 in fasted state
Experimental: Phase II- Group 2 (EGFRmut, de novo T790M, any MET, 1/3L antineoplastic, EGFR TKI naïve) - NSCLC participants harboring T790M mutation in de novo setting, irrespective of the activating mutation status who are treatment naïve or received maximum 2 lines of systemic antineoplastic therapy prior to study entry, but no therapy known to inhibit EGFR. Participants were treated at the RP2D of INC280 and EGF816 in fasted state
Experimental: Phase II- Group 3 (EGFRmut, T790M negative, any MET, 1L antineoplastic) - NSCLC participants with previously documented EGFR activating mutation, T790M negative, and any MET status who never received any prior line of systemic antineoplastic systemic therapy prior to study entry. Participants were treated at the RP2D of INC280 and EGF816 in fasted state
Experimental: Phase II- Group 4 (EGFRmut, any T790M, any MET, 1L (treatment naïve) 2-3L antineoplastic) - NSCLC participants with previously documented EGFR activating mutations and any T790M and MET status who were treatment naïve or failed maximum 2 prior lines of any systemic antineoplastic therapy for advanced disease. Participants were treated at the RP2D of INC280 and EGF816 in fed state
Experimental: Phase II- Group 5 (EGFRmut, T790M-, MET GCN=5, 2L, EGFR TKI resistant) - NSCLC participants with previously documented EGFR activating mutation, T790M negative, acquired MET amplification who have progressed on one prior line of therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC disease. Participants were to start with INC280 monotherapy (twice a day) and would have had the opportunity to continue to combination of EGF816 (once a day) and INC280 (twice a day) based on radiological disease progression evaluation by investigator's assessment per RECIST 1.1
Treatment: Drugs: Capmatinib
In the Phase 1, capmatinib was administered orally, twice per day, at a dose of 200 mg or 400 mg, in fasted state.
In the Phase II, participants received capmatinib at the RP2D (400 mg twice per day) in fasted state (Groups 1, 2 and 3) or fed state (Group 4).
Participants in Phase II Group 5 were to start with capmatinib monotherapy (fasted or fed state) and then would have had the opportunity to continue with the combination of nazartinib and capmatinib (fasted or fed state).
Treatment: Drugs: Nazartinib
In the Phase 1, nazartinib was administered orally, once a day, at a dose of 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg in fasted state.
In the Phase II, participants received nazartinib at the RP2D (100 mg once daily) in fasted state (Groups 1, 2 and 3) or fed state (Group 4). Participants in Phase II Group 5 were to start with capmatinib monotherapy (fasted or fed state) and then would have had the opportunity to continue with the combination of nazartinib and capmatinib (fasted or fed state).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Phase Ib: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Number of participants with DLTs in the Phase Ib part. A DLT is defined as an AE or abnormal laboratory value assessed as unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications that occurs within the first 28 days of treatment with EGF816 in combination with INC280 during the escalation part of the study (Phase Ib)
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Up to first 28 days of treatment
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Phase II Group 1, 2 and 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator's Assessment Per RECIST 1.1
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined by investigator's assessment in accordance to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). ORR was assessed in Group 1, 2 and 3 (Phase II part).
CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Phase II Group 4: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Number of participants in Group 4 (Phase II part) with AEs and SAEs. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From start of treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment, assessed up to 3.7 years
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Phase II Group 4: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of INC280 and EGF618
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of INC280, at least one dose interruption of INC280, at least one dose reduction of EGF816 and at least one dose interruption of EGF816 in the Group 4 (Phase II part).
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 3.6 years
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Phase II Group 4: Dose Intensity
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Dose intensity, defined as the ratio of total dose received and actual duration, for participants in Group 4 (Phase II part)
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 3.6 years
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Phase II Group 5: ORR Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment for INC280 Monotherapy
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) for participants in Group 5 (Phase II part) while on treatment with INC280 monotherapy.
CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Up to approximately 3 years (while on INC280 monotherapy)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Phase Ib: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of INC280 and EGF618
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Number of participants in Phase Ib with at least one dose reduction of INC280, at least one dose interruption of INC280, at least one dose reduction of EGF816 and at least one dose interruption of EGF816 .
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Phase II Group 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of INC280 and EGF618
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Number of participants in Groups 1, 2 and 3 (Phase II part) with at least one dose reduction of INC280, at least one dose interruption of INC280, at least one dose reduction of EGF816 and at least one dose interruption of EGF816 .
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Phase Ib: Dose Intensity
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Dose intensity, defined as the ratio of total dose received and actual duration, in Phase Ib participants
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Phase II Group 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Dose intensity, defined as the ratio of total dose received and actual duration, in Group 1, 2 and 3 (Phase II)
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Phase Ib: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
ORR is defined as percentage of participants with best overall response of PR+CR determined by Investigator's assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1. ORR was assessed in Phase Ib participants.
CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Up to approximately 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Phase II Group 4: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
ORR is defined as percentage of participants with best overall response of PR+CR determined by Investigator's assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1. ORR was assessed in Group 4 (Phase II) CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Phase Ib: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
PFS is defined as time from date of first dose of study treatment to date of first documented disease progression determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1.or death due to any cause. The PFS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. If a participant has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PFS was assessed in Phase Ib participants
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From date of first dose to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Phase II Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
PFS is defined as time from date of first dose of study treatment to date of first documented disease progression determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1.or death due to any cause. The PFS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. If a participant has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PFS was assessed in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Phase II)
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From date of first dose to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Phase Ib: Time to Response (TTR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
TTR is defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of first documented response (CR or PR) determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1. The TTR distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. If a participant has not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. TTR was assessed in Phase Ib participants.
CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From the date of the first dose to the date of first documented response, up to approximately 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Phase II Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4: Time to Response (TTR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
TTR is defined as the time from the date of the first dose to the date of first documented response (CR or PR) determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1. The TTR distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. If a participant has not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. TTR was assessed in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Phase II) CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
From the date of the first dose to the date of first documented response, up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Phase Ib: Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
DOR is defined as the time from first documented response (PR or CR) to the date of first documented disease progression determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1 or death due to underlying cancer. The DOR distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. If a participant has not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was assessed in Phase Ib participants CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
From date of first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Phase II Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4: Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
DOR is defined as the time from first documented response (PR or CR) to the date of first documented disease progression determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1 or death due to underlying cancer. The DOR distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. If a participant has not had an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was assessed in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Phase II) CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From date of first documented response to first documented disease progression or deaths, assessed up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Phase Ib: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1. DCR was assessed in Phase Ib participants CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD= Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progression.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Up to approximately 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Phase II Group 1, 2 3 and 4: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of CR, PR, or SD determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1. DCR was assessed in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Phase II) CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD= Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progression.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Phase Ib: Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
OS is defined as the time from first dose of the study treatment to the date of death due to any cause. The OS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact. OS was assessed in Phase Ib participants
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
From date of first dose to death, assessed up to approximately 5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Phase II Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4: Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
OS is defined as the time from first dose of the study treatment to the date of death due to any cause. The OS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated. If a participant was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact. OS was assessed in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
From date of first dose to death, assessed up to approximately 4 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Phase Ib: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12) of INC280
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on INC280 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Phase Ib: Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of INC280
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on INC280 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Phase Ib: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of INC280
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on INC280 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Actual time of sample collection was used (not the nominal time point as per scheduled assessment)
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Phase II Groups 3 and 4: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours (AUC0-12) of INC280
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on INC280 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Phase II Groups 3 and 4: Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of INC280
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on INC280 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Phase II Groups 3 and 4: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of INC280
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on INC280 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Actual time of sample collection was used (not the nominal time point as per scheduled assessment)
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Phase Ib: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of EGF816
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on EGF816 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr and 24 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Phase Ib: Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of EGF816
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on EGF816 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr and 24 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Phase Ib: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of EGF816
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on EGF816 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Actual time of sample collection was used (not the nominal time point as per scheduled assessment)
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr and 24 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Phase II Groups 3 and 4: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of EGF816
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on EGF816 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr and 24 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Phase II Groups 3 and 4: Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of EGF816
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on EGF816 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr and 24 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Phase II Groups 3 and 4: Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of EGF816
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on EGF816 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Actual time of sample collection was used (not the nominal time point as per scheduled assessment)
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
Pre-dose, 0.5 hours (hr) and 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr and 12 hr and 24 hr post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Cycle=28 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Phase II Group 5: Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment for INC280 Monotherapy
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
DOR is defined as the time from first documented response (PR or CR) to the date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1 for participants in Group 5 (Phase II) while on INC280 monotherapy treatment.
CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
From date of first documented response to the date of first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 3 years (while on INC280 monotherapy)
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Phase II Group 5: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment for INC280 Monotherapy
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of CR, PR, or SD determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1 for participants in Group 5 (Phase II) while on INC280 monotherapy treatment.
CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD= Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progression.
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
Up to approximately 3 years (while on INC280 monotherapy)
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Phase II Group 5: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST 1.1 Based on Investigator's Assessment for INC280 Monotherapy
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
PFS is defined as time from date of first dose of study treatment to date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause determined by Investigator assessment in accordance to RECIST 1.1 for participants in Group 5 (Phase II) while on INC280 monotherapy treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
Up to approximately 3 years (while on INC280 monotherapy)
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Phase II Group 5: Number of Participants With Dose Modifications for INC280 Monotherapy as Well as INC280 in Combination With EGF816 Therapy
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Number of participants with dose modifications for INC280 monotherapy as well as INC280 in combination with EGF816 therapy
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
From start of treatment until end of treatment, up to approximately 3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [33]
0
0
Phase II Group 5: Dose Intensity for INC280 Monotherapy as Well as INC280 in Combination With EGF816 Therapy
Query!
Assessment method [33]
0
0
Dose intensity is defined as the ratio of total dose received and actual duration for INC280 monotherapy as well as INC280 in combination with EGF816 therapy in Group 5 (Phase II)
Query!
Timepoint [33]
0
0
From start of treatment until end of treatment, up to approximately 3 years
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion criteria:
- Participants in Phase Ib and Phase II Groups 1 to 4: histologically documented, locally advanced or recurrent (stage IIIB who were not eligible for combined modality treatment) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC.
Participants in Phase II Group 5: stage IIIB/IIIC (not amenable to curative surgery, chemoradiation or radiation) or stage IV NSCLC
* Participants in Phase Ib and Phase II Groups 1 to 4: locally documented EGFR mutation L858R and/or ex19del, or a characterized de novo EGFR T790M mutation (or other rare activating mutations that confer sensitivity to 1st and 2nd generation EGFR inhibitors (e.g. L861Q, G719X, S768I), or a characterized de novo EGFRT790M mutation.
* Presence of at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST v.1.1
* ECOG performance status =1
* Participants had to be screened for HBV. Participants who were either HBsAg positive or HBV-DNA positive had to be willing and able to take antiviral therapy 1-2 weeks prior to 1st dose of EGF816 treatment and continue on antiviral therapy for at least 4 weeks after the last dose of EGF816.
* Participants had to be screened for HCV. Participants had to have negative hepatitis C antibody (HCV Ab) or were HCV Ab positive but with an undetectable level of HCV-RNA. Note: participants with detectable HCV-RNA were not eligible for the study.
* Phase Ib only: documented progression of disease according to RECIST v1.1 while on continuous treatment with EGFR TKI (e.g.: erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib).
* Phase II Group 1 (EGFRmut, any T790M, any c-MET, 2/4L antineoplastic, EGFR TKI resistant) only: Participants demonstrated a documented clinical benefit (CR (any duration), PR (any duration), or SD for at least 6 months) on prior EGFR TKI (e.g. erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib, and subsequently demonstrated progression according to RECIST v1.1.
* Phase II Group 2 (EGFRmut, de novo T790M, any c-MET, 1/3L antineoplastic, EGFR TKI naïve) only: Advanced NSCLC participants who were not previously treated with any therapy known to inhibit EGFR and harbor de novo T790M mutation .
* Phase II Group 3 (EGFRmut, T790M negative, any c-MET, 1L antineoplastic) only: participants had to harbor an EGFR activating mutation and had to be naïve from any line of systemic antineoplastic therapy in the advanced setting.
* Phase II Group 4 (EGFRmut, any T790M, any c-MET, 1L (treatment-naïve), 2//3L antineoplastic): All participants had to harbor an EGFR activating mutation and 2/3L participants had to have failed (defined as intolerance to treatment or documented disease progression) a maximum of 2 prior lines of antineoplastic therapy in the advanced setting
* Phase II Group 5 only: Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC (excluding squamous cell carcinoma) with all the following:
1. EGFR mutations known to be associated with EGFR TKI sensitivity. This had to be assessed as part of the participant standard of care by a validated test for EGFR mutations, as per local regulations. Exon 19 del, L858R, either alone or in combination with other EGFR sensitivity mutation assessed by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certified USA laboratory or an accredited local laboratory outside the USA had to be documented in the participant source documents before the participant consented for pre-screening for MET amplification status.
2. EGFR T790M negative status for participants who had progressed on first or second generation EGFR TKI, or third generation EGFR TKI other than osimertinib, as per tissue-based result from a CLIA-certified USA laboratory or an accredited local laboratory outside of the USA, by a validated test according to local regulations.
3. MET gene amplification defined as: Gene copy number (GCN) = 5 per tissue-based result from a CLIA-certified USA laboratory or an accredited local laboratory outside of the USA by a test that is validated according to local regulations with results documented in the participant source documents.
4. Histological transformation from NSCLC into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following previous EGFR TKI treatment were excluded.
* Participants had to have progressed on one prior line of therapy either to first/second generation EGFR TKIs, osimertinib or other third generation EGFR TKIs for advanced/metastatic disease (stage IIIB/IIIC [not amenable to curative surgery, chemoradiation or radiation or stage IV NSCLC).
* Participants had to have a life expectancy of at least 3 months.
Key exclusion Criteria:
* Phase Ib:
* More than one previous treatment line with erlotinib, gefitinib or afatinib
* Previous treatment with any investigational agent known to inhibit EGFR (mutant or wild-type)
* Participants who had received more than three prior lines of antineoplastic therapies (including EGFR TKI) in advanced setting.
* Phase II Group 1 (EGFRmut, any T790M, any c-MET, 2/4L antineoplastic, EGFR TKI resistant):
* More than 3 prior lines of systemic antineoplastic therapies (including EGFR TKI) in the advanced setting
* More than 1 previous treatment line with 1st or 2nd generation EGFR TKI (e.g. erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib) in the advanced setting
* Previous treatment with an investigational or marketed 3rd generation EGFR TKI (e.g. AZD9291, CO-1686, ASP8273, EGF816)
* Previous treatment with an investigational or marketed agent known to inhibit EGFR (e.g. EGF monoclonal antibody therapy, dual TKI inhibitor).
* Phase II Group 2 (EGFRmut, de novo T790M, any c-MET, 1/3L antineoplastic, EGFR TKI naïve):
* More than two previous treatment lines of systemic antineoplastic therapies in the advanced setting
* Previous treatment with an investigational or marketed agent that inhibits EGFR. EGFR inhibitors include (but not limited to) all generations of EGFR TKI (e.g.erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, AZD9291, CO-1686, ASP8273, EGF816) or other anti-EGFR or EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy or dual TKI inhibitors.
* Phase II Group 3 (EGFRmut, T790M negative, any c-MET, 1L antineoplastic):
* De novo EGFR T790M mutation identified by central assessment
* Previous treatment with any systemic antineoplastic therapy in the advanced setting (NSCLC stage IIIB or IV. Participants who received only one cycle of antineoplastic therapy in the advanced setting were allowed).
* Phase II Group 4 (EGFRmut, any T790M, any c-MET, 1/3L antineoplastic):
* More than 2 prior lines of systemic antineoplastic therapies in the advanced setting
* Previous treatment with an investigational or marketed 3rd generation EGFR TKI (e.g. AZD9291, CO-1686, ASP8273, EGF816)
* Previous treatment with an investigational or marketed agent known to inhibit EGFR (e.g. EGF monoclonal antibody therapy, dual TKI inhibitor).
* Previous treatment with a c-MET inhibitor or HGF-targeting therapy.
* Participants with symptomatic brain metastases.
* Phase II Group 5: Participants with symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases who were neurologically unstable or had required increasing doses of steroids within the 2 weeks prior to study entry to manage CNS symptoms.
* Presence or history of another malignancy. Exception: Participants who had been disease-free for 3 years, or participants with a history of adequately treated in-situ carcinoma of the uterine cervix, completely resected basal or squamous cell carcinoma, non-melanomatous cancer of skin, history of stage IA melanoma that had been cured, were eligible.
For Phase II Group 5: Presence or history of a malignant disease other than NSCLC that had been diagnosed and/or required therapy within the past 3 years. Exceptions to this exclusion include completely resected basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers, and completely resected carcinoma in situ of any type.
* Undergone a bone marrow or solid organ transplant.
* Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity (HIV testing is not mandatory).
For Group 5: Participants with known history of testing positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, and with a history of Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) defining opportunistic infections in the last 12 months prior to the first dose of study treatment had to be excluded
* Participants receiving concomitant immunosuppressive agents or chronic corticosteroids used at the time of study entry except for control of brain metastases, topical applications, inhaled sprays, eye drops or local injections
* Participants with clinically significant, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
* Presence or history of interstitial lung disease or interstitial pneumonitis
* Participants who had not recovered from all toxicities related to prior anticancer therapies to grade =1 (CTCAE v 4.03)
* Participants who had out of range laboratory values
* Participants who received live vaccines
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 1
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
13/01/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
10/11/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
177
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Marseille Cedex 05
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Baden-Württemberg
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
BO
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
MO
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
PG
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Korea
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Oslo
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Catalunya
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Galicia
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Las Palmas De Gran Canaria
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Taiwan ROC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) / recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of nazartinib (EGF816) in combination with capmatinib (INC280) and to estimate the preliminary anti-tumor activity of nazartinib in combination with capmatinib in participants with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with documented EGFR mutation.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02335944
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Jia Y, Juarez J, Li J, Manuia M, Niederst MJ, Tompkins C, Timple N, Vaillancourt MT, Pferdekamper AC, Lockerman EL, Li C, Anderson J, Costa C, Liao D, Murphy E, DiDonato M, Bursulaya B, Lelais G, Barretina J, McNeill M, Epple R, Marsilje TH, Pathan N, Engelman JA, Michellys PY, McNamara P, Harris J, Bender S, Kasibhatla S. EGF816 Exerts Anticancer Effects in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Irreversibly and Selectively Targeting Primary and Acquired Activating Mutations in the EGF Receptor. Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 15;76(6):1591-602. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2581. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
0
0
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/44/NCT02335944/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/44/NCT02335944/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02335944