Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00167531
Registration number
NCT00167531
Ethics application status
Date submitted
12/09/2005
Date registered
14/09/2005
Date last updated
2/10/2009
Titles & IDs
Public title
The Efficacy of Treadmill Training in Establishing Walking After Stroke
Query!
Scientific title
The Efficacy of Treadmill Training in Establishing Walking After Stroke
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
02/06/09
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Stroke
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Stroke
0
0
0
0
Query!
Haemorrhagic
Query!
Stroke
0
0
0
0
Query!
Ischaemic
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
BEHAVIORAL - assisted overground walking
Experimental: Treadmill walking - 30 minutes per day of treadmill walking with body weight support and assistance from one therapist
Active comparator: Overground walking - 30 minutes per day of overground walking with assistance from one therapist
BEHAVIORAL: assisted overground walking
30 minutes per day of overground walking with the assistance of one therapist
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
BEHAVIORAL
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Proportion of participants walking independently (defined for the purposes of this study as'being able to walk 15 m continuously across flat ground without any aids').
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Within 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Quality of walking: measured by quantifying parameters such as speed, affected and intact step length, step width, and cadence during 10 m walk test.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Within 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Walking capacity at six months measured by 10 m and 6 minute walk tests. Walking participation measured using the Adelaide Activity Profile.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
6 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* First stroke
* Within 28 days post stroke
* Aged between 50 and 85 years of age
* Unilateral hemiplegia/hemiparesis and
* Score for Item 5 of the Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke < 2
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
85
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Any barriers to taking part in a physical rehabilitation program
* Insufficient cognition/language
* Unstable cardiac status
* Neuro-surgery
* Any pre-morbid history of orthopaedic conditions or any other problems that would preclude patient from relearning to walk.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/08/2002
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/07/2009
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
126
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
The Prince Henry and Prince of Wales Hospitals - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Blacktown / Mt Druitt Hospital - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
St George Hospital - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Kingston Centre - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2031 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2112 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2148 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
2217 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
3192 - Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Being able to walk is a major determinant of whether a patient returns home after stroke or lives in residential care. For the family, the loss of the stroke sufferer from everyday life is a catastrophic event. For the community, the costs of being unable to walk after stroke are exorbitant, involving a lifetime of residential care. Therefore, an increase in the proportion of stroke patients who regain walking ability will be a significant advance. This trial will determine, in patients early after stroke who are unable to walk, whether training walking using a treadmill with partial weight support via an overhead harness will be more effective than current intervention in (i) establishing more independent walking, reducing the time taken to achieve independent walking, and improving the quality of independent walking, and (ii) improving walking capacity and participation 6 months later.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00167531
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Ada L, Dean CM, Hall JM, Bampton J, Crompton S. A treadmill and overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Oct;84(10):1486-91. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00349-6. Dean CM, Ada L, Bampton J, Morris ME, Katrak PH, Potts S. Treadmill walking with body weight support in subacute non-ambulatory stroke improves walking capacity more than overground walking: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2010;56(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/s1836-9553(10)70039-4. Ada L, Dean CM, Morris ME, Simpson JM, Katrak P. Randomized trial of treadmill walking with body weight support to establish walking in subacute stroke: the MOBILISE trial. Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1237-42. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.569483. Epub 2010 Apr 22. Ada L, Dean CM, Morris ME. Supported treadmill training to establish walking in non-ambulatory patients early after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2007 Sep 6;7:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-7-29.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Louise Ada, PhD
Query!
Address
0
0
University of Sydney
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00167531
Download to PDF