Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12607000606482
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/11/2007
Date registered
26/11/2007
Date last updated
8/04/2008
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The Effect of Detailed Anchor Point Descriptors on Patient Self Report of Health-Related Quality of Life.
Query!
Scientific title
What is the effect of providing detailed upper and lower anchor point descriptors on patient self-report of health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D visual analogue scale amongst patients undergoing geriatric rehabilitation.
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
This is a trial investigating a methodogical issue of measuring health-related quality of life. It will be conducted amongst subacute elderly hospital patients in the rehabilitation unit of a tertiary hosiptal.
2573
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
2683
2683
0
0
Query!
Other public health
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This study involves two interventions:
Intervention A - providing detailed descriptors for the upper anchor point on a visual analogue scale of health-related quality of life (part of EQ-5D instrument). The duration of intervention A was the time taken to read the descriptors (less than 5 minutes).
Intervention B - providing detailed descriptors for the lower anchor point on a visual analogue scale of health-related quality of life (part of EQ-5D instrument). The duration of intervention B was the time taken to read the descriptors (less than 5 minutes).
The descriptors to be used in each intervention will be those descriptors used in another validated health-related quality of life measurement instrument, the AQoL (Assessment of Quality of Life).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
2308
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
A crossover design will compare the effect of giving the upper anchor point descriptor (intervention A) to the lower anchor point descriptor (intervention B). Comparisons will also be made to when no anchor points descriptors were given. There will essentially be no washout period between interventions (<5mins).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
3585
0
Patient self report of health-related quality of life using the visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D health-related quality of life instrument.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
3585
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
3585
0
The EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) of health state will be taken at three timepoints. After consent (1), immediately after the first intervention (2), then immediately after the second intervention (3). These will all be conducted within a 30 minute period.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
6007
0
Patients are asked whether the anchor desriptors, read to the patient as part of the intervention, described a more extreme health state than the anchor they had originally considerered (for the end of the visual analogue scale relating to the respective intervention) when completing the visual analogue scale at baseline, e.g. after Intervention A is given the participant is asked whether that description of best imaginable health was even better than they had considered to be the best imaginable health state at the top of the scale when they first rated their health on the VAS (at baseline). The patients response is recorded as binary data (y/n).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
6007
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
6007
0
Immediately after each intervention.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Older hospital patients undergoing rehabilitation.
2. Basic cognition intact as indicated by a mini-mental state examination > 23.
Query!
Minimum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Unable to communicate effectively in English.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The allocation sequence was generated by a blinded member of the research team and stored in a locked filing cabinet. Patients are approached by a research assistant who does not know the allocation sequence (or have access to the filing cabinet) who seeks informed consent. Consenting patients are assigned a participant number in order of recruitment. Consenting participants are then allocated to group (one or two) in order of their participant number to the next group in the random sequence by a separate research assistant who provides the intervention.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The sequence was generated via a computerised random number generator
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
22/02/2007
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
496
0
4102
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
2820
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
2820
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
2820
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road
Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country [1]
2820
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Steven McPhail
Query!
Address
Physiotherapy Department
Ground Floor
Bld 7
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road
Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
2545
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
2545
0
Dr. Terry Haines
Query!
Address [1]
2545
0
Physiotherapy Department
Ground Floor
Bld 7
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road
Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country [1]
2545
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
4747
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
4747
0
HREC Manager Princess Alexandra Hospital Ipswich Road Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
4747
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
4747
0
22/12/2005
Query!
Approval date [1]
4747
0
17/05/2006
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
4747
0
2005/231
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
4748
0
The University of Queensland Medical Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
4748
0
Chairperson Medical Research Ethics Committee The University of Queensland Brisbane QLD 4072
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
4748
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
4748
0
18/12/2006
Query!
Approval date [2]
4748
0
17/01/2007
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
4748
0
2007/037
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a trial investigating how providing detailed desciptors of a very good, and very bad health state affect the way people rate their own health-related quality of life. Health-related quality of life can be difficult to measure. Giving detailed description of extreme health states may help participants to "put into perspective" their current health states. This may result in reporting a different level of health than they would report if no detailed descriptors were given.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
28206
0
Query!
Address
28206
0
Query!
Country
28206
0
Query!
Phone
28206
0
Query!
Fax
28206
0
Query!
Email
28206
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11363
0
Steven McPhail
Query!
Address
11363
0
Physiotherapy Department
Ground Floor
Bld 7
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road
Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country
11363
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
11363
0
+61 7 32406701
Query!
Fax
11363
0
Query!
Email
11363
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2291
0
Steven McPhail
Query!
Address
2291
0
Physiotherapy Department
Ground Floor
Bld 7
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road
Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country
2291
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
2291
0
+61 7 32406701
Query!
Fax
2291
0
Query!
Email
2291
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF